Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Der Internist 8/2018

06.07.2018 | Pankreaskarzinom | CME

Duktales Adenokarzinom des Pankreas

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. E. Gallmeier, T. M. Gress

Erschienen in: Die Innere Medizin | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Das duktale Adenokarzinom ist die häufigste maligne Raumforderung des Pankreas. Trotz großer Forschungsanstrengungen und gradueller Verbesserungen der Diagnostik und Therapie weist es immer noch eine sehr ungünstige Prognose auf. Dieser CME-Fortbildungsbeitrag liefert unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen deutschen, europäischen und US-amerikanischen Leitlinien einen allgemeinen Überblick zu dieser Erkrankung. Zudem werden ausgewählte aktuelle Aspekte der Epidemiologie, Pathogenese und Genetik sowie Grundprinzipien der Diagnostik und Therapie einschließlich potenzieller zukünftiger Therapieoptionen erörtert.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzgerald TL, Hickner ZJ, Schmitz M et al (2008) Changing incidence of pancreatic neoplasms: a 16-year review of statewide tumor registry. Pancreas 37:134–138CrossRefPubMed Fitzgerald TL, Hickner ZJ, Schmitz M et al (2008) Changing incidence of pancreatic neoplasms: a 16-year review of statewide tumor registry. Pancreas 37:134–138CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH et al (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, 4. Aufl. World Health Organization (WHO), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH et al (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, 4. Aufl. World Health Organization (WHO), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R et al (2014) Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 74:2913–2921CrossRefPubMed Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R et al (2014) Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 74:2913–2921CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P et al (2017) Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389:1011–1024CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P et al (2017) Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389:1011–1024CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP et al (2013) Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med 369:1691–1703CrossRef Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP et al (2013) Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med 369:1691–1703CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M et al (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M et al (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A et al (2013) Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA 310:1473–1481CrossRefPubMed Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A et al (2013) Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA 310:1473–1481CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey P, Chang DK, Nones K et al (2016) Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nature 531:47–52CrossRefPubMed Bailey P, Chang DK, Nones K et al (2016) Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nature 531:47–52CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Electronic address aadhe, cancer genome atlas research N (2017) integrated genomic characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 32:185–203.e13CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Electronic address aadhe, cancer genome atlas research N (2017) integrated genomic characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 32:185–203.e13CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones S, Zhang X, Parsons DW et al (2008) Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by global genomic analyses. Science 321:1801–1806CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jones S, Zhang X, Parsons DW et al (2008) Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by global genomic analyses. Science 321:1801–1806CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Witkiewicz AK, McMillan EA, Balaji U et al (2015) Whole-exome sequencing of pancreatic cancer defines genetic diversity and therapeutic targets. Nat Commun 6:6744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Witkiewicz AK, McMillan EA, Balaji U et al (2015) Whole-exome sequencing of pancreatic cancer defines genetic diversity and therapeutic targets. Nat Commun 6:6744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts NJ, Norris AL, Petersen GM et al (2016) Whole genome sequencing defines the genetic heterogeneity of familial pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov 6:166–175CrossRefPubMed Roberts NJ, Norris AL, Petersen GM et al (2016) Whole genome sequencing defines the genetic heterogeneity of familial pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov 6:166–175CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartsch DK, Slater EP, Carrato A et al (2016) Refinement of screening for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut 65:1314–1321CrossRefPubMed Bartsch DK, Slater EP, Carrato A et al (2016) Refinement of screening for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut 65:1314–1321CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Korc M, Jeon CY, Edderkaoui M et al (2017) Tobacco and alcohol as risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 31:529–536CrossRefPubMed Korc M, Jeon CY, Edderkaoui M et al (2017) Tobacco and alcohol as risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 31:529–536CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C et al (2015) Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 26(Suppl 5):v56–v68CrossRefPubMed Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C et al (2015) Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 26(Suppl 5):v56–v68CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB (2015) Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a summary review of meta-analytical studies. Int J Epidemiol 44:186–198CrossRefPubMed Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB (2015) Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a summary review of meta-analytical studies. Int J Epidemiol 44:186–198CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hruban RH, Goggins M, Parsons J et al (2000) Progression model for pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6:2969–2972PubMed Hruban RH, Goggins M, Parsons J et al (2000) Progression model for pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6:2969–2972PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR et al (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319:525–532CrossRefPubMed Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR et al (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319:525–532CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yachida S, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA (2013) Evolution and dynamics of pancreatic cancer progression. Oncogene 32:5253–5260CrossRefPubMed Yachida S, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA (2013) Evolution and dynamics of pancreatic cancer progression. Oncogene 32:5253–5260CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Basturk O, Hong SM, Wood LD et al (2015) A revised classification system and recommendations from the baltimore consensus meeting for neoplastic precursor lesions in the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol 39:1730–1741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Basturk O, Hong SM, Wood LD et al (2015) A revised classification system and recommendations from the baltimore consensus meeting for neoplastic precursor lesions in the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol 39:1730–1741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Brierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, Hoboken Brierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, Hoboken
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Porta M, Fabregat X, Malats N et al (2005) Exocrine pancreatic cancer: symptoms at presentation and their relation to tumour site and stage. Clin Transl Oncol 7:189–197CrossRefPubMed Porta M, Fabregat X, Malats N et al (2005) Exocrine pancreatic cancer: symptoms at presentation and their relation to tumour site and stage. Clin Transl Oncol 7:189–197CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mujica VR, Barkin JS, Go VL (2000) Acute pancreatitis secondary to pancreatic carcinoma. Study Group Participants. Pancreas 21:329–332CrossRefPubMed Mujica VR, Barkin JS, Go VL (2000) Acute pancreatitis secondary to pancreatic carcinoma. Study Group Participants. Pancreas 21:329–332CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Chari ST, Leibson CL, Rabe KG et al (2005) Probability of pancreatic cancer following diabetes: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 129:504–511CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chari ST, Leibson CL, Rabe KG et al (2005) Probability of pancreatic cancer following diabetes: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 129:504–511CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Seufferlein T, Porzner M, Becker T et al (2013) S3-guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer. Z Gastroenterol 51:1395–1440CrossRefPubMed Seufferlein T, Porzner M, Becker T et al (2013) S3-guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer. Z Gastroenterol 51:1395–1440CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Duffy MJ, Sturgeon C, Lamerz R et al (2010) Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM) status report. Ann Oncol 21:441–447CrossRefPubMed Duffy MJ, Sturgeon C, Lamerz R et al (2010) Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM) status report. Ann Oncol 21:441–447CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballehaninna UK, Chamberlain RS (2012) The clinical utility of serum CA 19-9 in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: An evidence based appraisal. J Gastrointest Oncol 3:105–119PubMedPubMedCentral Ballehaninna UK, Chamberlain RS (2012) The clinical utility of serum CA 19-9 in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: An evidence based appraisal. J Gastrointest Oncol 3:105–119PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JE, Lee KT, Lee JK et al (2004) Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:182–186CrossRefPubMed Kim JE, Lee KT, Lee JK et al (2004) Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:182–186CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST et al (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic association. Gastroenterology 146:291–304.e1CrossRefPubMed Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST et al (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic association. Gastroenterology 146:291–304.e1CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Bipat S, Phoa SS, van Delden OM et al (2005) Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:438–445CrossRefPubMed Bipat S, Phoa SS, van Delden OM et al (2005) Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:438–445CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Nawaz H, Fan CY, Kloke J et al (2013) Performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. JOP 14:484–497PubMedPubMedCentral Nawaz H, Fan CY, Kloke J et al (2013) Performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. JOP 14:484–497PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Okasha HH, Naga MI, Esmat S et al (2013) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration versus percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses. Endosc Ultrasound 2:190–193CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Okasha HH, Naga MI, Esmat S et al (2013) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration versus percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses. Endosc Ultrasound 2:190–193CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Micames C, Jowell PS, White R et al (2003) Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 58:690–695CrossRefPubMed Micames C, Jowell PS, White R et al (2003) Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 58:690–695CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M et al (2017) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15:1028–1061CrossRefPubMed Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M et al (2017) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15:1028–1061CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Barreto SG, Windsor JA (2016) Justifying vein resection with pancreatoduodenectomy. Lancet Oncol 17:e118–e124CrossRefPubMed Barreto SG, Windsor JA (2016) Justifying vein resection with pancreatoduodenectomy. Lancet Oncol 17:e118–e124CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans DB, George B, Tsai S (2015) Non-metastatic pancreatic cancer: resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced-definitions of increasing importance for the optimal delivery of Multimodality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3409–3413CrossRefPubMed Evans DB, George B, Tsai S (2015) Non-metastatic pancreatic cancer: resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced-definitions of increasing importance for the optimal delivery of Multimodality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3409–3413CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lutz MP, Zalcberg JR, Ducreux M et al (2017) 3rd St. Gallen EORTC Gastrointestinal Cancer Conference: consensus recommendations on controversial issues in the primary treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer 79:41–49CrossRefPubMed Lutz MP, Zalcberg JR, Ducreux M et al (2017) 3rd St. Gallen EORTC Gastrointestinal Cancer Conference: consensus recommendations on controversial issues in the primary treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer 79:41–49CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD (2011) Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364:2128–2137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD (2011) Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364:2128–2137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD et al (2001) Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 358:1576–1585CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD et al (2001) Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 358:1576–1585CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C et al (2010) Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 304:1073–1081CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C et al (2010) Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 304:1073–1081CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297:267–277CrossRefPubMed Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297:267–277CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagrial AM, Chang DK, Nguyen NQ et al (2014) Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 110:313–319CrossRefPubMed Nagrial AM, Chang DK, Nguyen NQ et al (2014) Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 110:313–319CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Valle JW, Palmer D, Jackson R et al (2014) Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study. J Clin Oncol 32:504–512CrossRefPubMed Valle JW, Palmer D, Jackson R et al (2014) Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study. J Clin Oncol 32:504–512CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C et al (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156:591–600CrossRefPubMed Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C et al (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156:591–600CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U et al (2011) Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium: better prediction of outcome. Ann Surg 254:311–319CrossRefPubMed Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U et al (2011) Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium: better prediction of outcome. Ann Surg 254:311–319CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KS, Kwon J, Kim K et al (2017) Impact of resection margin distance on survival of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Res Treat 49:824–833CrossRefPubMed Kim KS, Kwon J, Kim K et al (2017) Impact of resection margin distance on survival of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Res Treat 49:824–833CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362:129–137CrossRefPubMed van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362:129–137CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Tol JA, van Hooft JE, Timmer R et al (2016) Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer. Gut 65:1981–1987CrossRefPubMed Tol JA, van Hooft JE, Timmer R et al (2016) Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer. Gut 65:1981–1987CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Ettrich TJ, Schulte LA, Eitel N et al (2017) Surveillance after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with curative intent—a multicenter survey in Germany and review of the literature. Z Gastroenterol 55:657–666CrossRefPubMed Ettrich TJ, Schulte LA, Eitel N et al (2017) Surveillance after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with curative intent—a multicenter survey in Germany and review of the literature. Z Gastroenterol 55:657–666CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde C et al (2010) Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. Plos Med 7:e1000267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde C et al (2010) Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. Plos Med 7:e1000267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Balaban EP, Mangu PB, Khorana AA et al (2016) Locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:2654–2668CrossRefPubMed Balaban EP, Mangu PB, Khorana AA et al (2016) Locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:2654–2668CrossRefPubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Rombouts SJ, Walma MS, Vogel JA et al (2016) Systematic review of resection rates and clinical outcomes after FOLFIRINOX-based treatment in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:4352–4360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rombouts SJ, Walma MS, Vogel JA et al (2016) Systematic review of resection rates and clinical outcomes after FOLFIRINOX-based treatment in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:4352–4360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner M, Antunes C, Pietrasz D et al (2017) CT evaluation after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 27:3104–3116CrossRefPubMed Wagner M, Antunes C, Pietrasz D et al (2017) CT evaluation after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 27:3104–3116CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurt CN, Mukherjee S, Bridgewater J et al (2015) Health-related quality of life in SCALOP, a randomized phase 2 trial comparing chemoradiation therapy regimens in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 93:810–818CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hurt CN, Mukherjee S, Bridgewater J et al (2015) Health-related quality of life in SCALOP, a randomized phase 2 trial comparing chemoradiation therapy regimens in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 93:810–818CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukherjee S, Hurt CN, Bridgewater J et al (2013) Gemcitabine-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SCALOP): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:317–326CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mukherjee S, Hurt CN, Bridgewater J et al (2013) Gemcitabine-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SCALOP): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:317–326CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammel P, Huguet F, van Laethem JL et al (2016) Effect of cemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: the LAP07 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315:1844–1853CrossRefPubMed Hammel P, Huguet F, van Laethem JL et al (2016) Effect of cemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: the LAP07 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315:1844–1853CrossRefPubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413CrossRefPubMed Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413CrossRefPubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Li D, Capanu M, Yu KH et al (2015) Treatment, Outcomes, and Clinical Trial Participation in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Pancreas Adenocarcinoma. Clin Colorectal Cancer 14:269–276e1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li D, Capanu M, Yu KH et al (2015) Treatment, Outcomes, and Clinical Trial Participation in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Pancreas Adenocarcinoma. Clin Colorectal Cancer 14:269–276e1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Hackert T, Niesen W, Hinz U et al (2017) Radical surgery of oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:358–363CrossRefPubMed Hackert T, Niesen W, Hinz U et al (2017) Radical surgery of oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:358–363CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966CrossRefPubMed Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966CrossRefPubMed
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang-Gillam A, Li CP, Bodoky G et al (2016) Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 387:545–557CrossRefPubMed Wang-Gillam A, Li CP, Bodoky G et al (2016) Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 387:545–557CrossRefPubMed
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas M, Siveke JT, Schenk M et al (2018) Efficacy of gemcitabine plus erlotinib in rash-positive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer selected according to eligibility for FOLFIRINOX: a prospective phase II study of the ‚Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie‘. Eur J Cancer 94:95–103CrossRefPubMed Haas M, Siveke JT, Schenk M et al (2018) Efficacy of gemcitabine plus erlotinib in rash-positive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer selected according to eligibility for FOLFIRINOX: a prospective phase II study of the ‚Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie‘. Eur J Cancer 94:95–103CrossRefPubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinn M, Bahra M, Liersch T et al (2017) CONKO-005: Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus erlotinib versus gemcitabine alone in patients after R0 resection of pancreatic cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 35:3330–3337CrossRefPubMed Sinn M, Bahra M, Liersch T et al (2017) CONKO-005: Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus erlotinib versus gemcitabine alone in patients after R0 resection of pancreatic cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 35:3330–3337CrossRefPubMed
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogel A, Kullmann F, Kunzmann V et al (2015) Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and Hyperbilirubinaemia: review and German expert opinion on treatment with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine. Oncol Res Treat 38:596–603CrossRefPubMed Vogel A, Kullmann F, Kunzmann V et al (2015) Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and Hyperbilirubinaemia: review and German expert opinion on treatment with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine. Oncol Res Treat 38:596–603CrossRefPubMed
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahma OE, Duffy A, Liewehr DJ et al (2013) Second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive analysis of published clinical trials. Ann Oncol 24:1972–1979CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rahma OE, Duffy A, Liewehr DJ et al (2013) Second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive analysis of published clinical trials. Ann Oncol 24:1972–1979CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Portal A, Pernot S, Tougeron D et al (2015) Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after Folfirinox failure: an AGEO prospective multicentre cohort. Br J Cancer 113:989–995CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Portal A, Pernot S, Tougeron D et al (2015) Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after Folfirinox failure: an AGEO prospective multicentre cohort. Br J Cancer 113:989–995CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Oettle H, Riess H, Stieler JM et al (2014) Second-line oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil versus folinic acid and fluorouracil alone for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: outcomes from the CONKO-003 trial. J Clin Oncol 32:2423–2429CrossRefPubMed Oettle H, Riess H, Stieler JM et al (2014) Second-line oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil versus folinic acid and fluorouracil alone for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: outcomes from the CONKO-003 trial. J Clin Oncol 32:2423–2429CrossRefPubMed
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelzer U, Schwaner I, Stieler J et al (2011) Best supportive care (BSC) versus oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5‑fluorouracil (OFF) plus BSC in patients for second-line advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III-study from the German CONKO-study group. Eur J Cancer 47:1676–1681CrossRefPubMed Pelzer U, Schwaner I, Stieler J et al (2011) Best supportive care (BSC) versus oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5‑fluorouracil (OFF) plus BSC in patients for second-line advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III-study from the German CONKO-study group. Eur J Cancer 47:1676–1681CrossRefPubMed
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill S, Ko YJ, Cripps C et al (2016) PANCREOX: a randomized phase III study of fluorouracil/Leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin for second-line advanced pancreatic cancer in patients who have received Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 34:3914–3920CrossRefPubMed Gill S, Ko YJ, Cripps C et al (2016) PANCREOX: a randomized phase III study of fluorouracil/Leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin for second-line advanced pancreatic cancer in patients who have received Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 34:3914–3920CrossRefPubMed
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartung TJ, Brahler E, Faller H et al (2017) The risk of being depressed is significantly higher in cancer patients than in the general population: Prevalence and severity of depressive symptoms across major cancer types. Eur J Cancer 72:46–53CrossRefPubMed Hartung TJ, Brahler E, Faller H et al (2017) The risk of being depressed is significantly higher in cancer patients than in the general population: Prevalence and severity of depressive symptoms across major cancer types. Eur J Cancer 72:46–53CrossRefPubMed
77.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Donnell E (2013) The distress thermometer: a rapid and effective tool for the oncology social worker. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 26:353–359CrossRefPubMed O’Donnell E (2013) The distress thermometer: a rapid and effective tool for the oncology social worker. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 26:353–359CrossRefPubMed
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Gotze H, Brahler E, Gansera L et al (2018) Anxiety, depression and quality of life in family caregivers of palliative cancer patients during home care and after the patient’s death. Eur J Cancer Care (engl) 27:e12606CrossRef Gotze H, Brahler E, Gansera L et al (2018) Anxiety, depression and quality of life in family caregivers of palliative cancer patients during home care and after the patient’s death. Eur J Cancer Care (engl) 27:e12606CrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Ter Veer E, van Rijssen LB, Besselink MG et al (2018) Consensus statement on mandatory measurements in pancreatic cancer trials (COMM-PACT) for systemic treatment of unresectable disease. Lancet Oncol 19:e151–e160CrossRefPubMed Ter Veer E, van Rijssen LB, Besselink MG et al (2018) Consensus statement on mandatory measurements in pancreatic cancer trials (COMM-PACT) for systemic treatment of unresectable disease. Lancet Oncol 19:e151–e160CrossRefPubMed
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff RA (2018) Adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment in pancreatic malignancies: where are we? Surg Clin North Am 98:95–111CrossRefPubMed Wolff RA (2018) Adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment in pancreatic malignancies: where are we? Surg Clin North Am 98:95–111CrossRefPubMed
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Mokdad AA, Minter RM, Zhu H et al (2017) Neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection versus upfront resection for resectable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. J Clin Oncol 35:515–522CrossRefPubMed Mokdad AA, Minter RM, Zhu H et al (2017) Neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection versus upfront resection for resectable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. J Clin Oncol 35:515–522CrossRefPubMed
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Jameson GS, Borazanci EH, Babiker HM et al (2017) A phase Ib/II pilot trial with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients (pts) with stage IV pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:341–341CrossRef Jameson GS, Borazanci EH, Babiker HM et al (2017) A phase Ib/II pilot trial with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients (pts) with stage IV pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:341–341CrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Jameson GS, Borazanci EH, Poplin E et al (2015) Abstract LB-003: High complete and partial response rate in a phase Ib pilot trial with cisplatin plus albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 75:LB-3–LB-3CrossRef Jameson GS, Borazanci EH, Poplin E et al (2015) Abstract LB-003: High complete and partial response rate in a phase Ib pilot trial with cisplatin plus albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 75:LB-3–LB-3CrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Teo MY, O’Reilly EM (2016) Is it time to split strategies to treat homologous recombinant deficiency in pancreas cancer? J Gastrointest Oncol 7:738–749CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Teo MY, O’Reilly EM (2016) Is it time to split strategies to treat homologous recombinant deficiency in pancreas cancer? J Gastrointest Oncol 7:738–749CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemery S, Keegan P, Pazdur R (2017) First FDA approval agnostic of cancer site—when a biomarker defines the indication. N Engl J Med 377:1409–1412CrossRefPubMed Lemery S, Keegan P, Pazdur R (2017) First FDA approval agnostic of cancer site—when a biomarker defines the indication. N Engl J Med 377:1409–1412CrossRefPubMed
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu ZI, Shia J, Stadler ZK et al (2018) Evaluating mismatch repair deficiency in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: challenges and recommendations. Clin Cancer Res 24:1326–1336CrossRefPubMed Hu ZI, Shia J, Stadler ZK et al (2018) Evaluating mismatch repair deficiency in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: challenges and recommendations. Clin Cancer Res 24:1326–1336CrossRefPubMed
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Hingorani SR, Zheng L, Bullock AJ et al (2018) HALO 202: randomized phase II study of PEGPH20 plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in patients with untreated, metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 36:359–366CrossRefPubMed Hingorani SR, Zheng L, Bullock AJ et al (2018) HALO 202: randomized phase II study of PEGPH20 plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in patients with untreated, metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 36:359–366CrossRefPubMed
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramanathan RK, McDonough S, Philip PA et al (2018) A phase IB/II randomized study of mFOLFIRINOX (mFFOX) + pegylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) versus mFFOX alone in patients with good performance status metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC): SWOG S1313 (NCT #01959139). J Clin Oncol 36(suppl 4S):abstr 208 Ramanathan RK, McDonough S, Philip PA et al (2018) A phase IB/II randomized study of mFOLFIRINOX (mFFOX) + pegylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) versus mFFOX alone in patients with good performance status metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC): SWOG S1313 (NCT #01959139). J Clin Oncol 36(suppl 4S):abstr 208
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowery MA, Jordan EJ, Basturk O et al (2017) Real-time genomic profiling of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: potential actionability and correlation with clinical phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 23:6094–6100CrossRefPubMed Lowery MA, Jordan EJ, Basturk O et al (2017) Real-time genomic profiling of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: potential actionability and correlation with clinical phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 23:6094–6100CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Duktales Adenokarzinom des Pankreas
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. E. Gallmeier
T. M. Gress
Publikationsdatum
06.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Die Innere Medizin / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 2731-7080
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7099
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-018-0460-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

Der Internist 8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen des BDI

Mitteilungen des BDI

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.