nach oben

Die Radiologie

Erschienen in:

01.07.2014 | CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung

CT und MRT der Hüftprothese

verfasst von: Dr. C.A. Agten, R. Sutter, C.W.A. Pfirrmann

Erschienen in: Die Radiologie | Ausgabe 7/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Metallartefakte erschweren die Beurteilung von Computer- (CT) und Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) bei Patienten mit Hüftprothesen. Neuere technische Entwicklungen erlauben heute, beide Methoden bei Patienten mit schmerzhaften Hüftprothesen mit Erfolg einzusetzen. Neuere Technologien zur Metallartefaktreduktion in der CT sind unter anderem iterative Rekonstruktionsalgorithmen und Dual-Energy-CT, in der MRT neuere Sequenzen wie SEMAC („slice-encoding for metal artifact correction“) oder MAVRIC („multi-acquisition variable-resonance image combination“). Lockerung der Hüftprothese, Osteolysen durch Abriebpartikel und Pseudotumoren bei Metall-Metall-Prothesen sind wichtige Krankheitsbilder bei Hüftprothesen. Infektionen, Frakturen, Tendinopathien, Sehnenrupturen, Muskel- und Nervenschäden sowie heterotope Ossifikationen sind weitere Ursachen einer schmerzhaften Hüftprothese.

Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 24:1679–1691PubMedCrossRef

Boas FE, Fleischmann D (2012) CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imaging Med 4:229–240CrossRef

Mori I, Machida Y, Osanai M et al (2013) Photon starvation artifacts of X-ray CT: their true cause and a solution. Radiol Phys Technol 6:130–141PubMedCrossRef

Joseph PM, Spital RD (1982) The effects of scatter in x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 9:464–472PubMedCrossRef

Haramati N, Staron RB, Mazel-Sperling K et al (1994) CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition. Comput Med Imaging Graph 18:429–434PubMedCrossRef

Lee M-J, Kim S, Lee SA et al (2007) Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. Radiographics 27:791–803PubMedCrossRef

Moon SG, Hong SH, Choi JY et al (2008) Metal artifact reduction by the alteration of technical factors in multidetector computed tomography: a 3-dimensional quantitative assessment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:630–633PubMedCrossRef

Link TM, Berning W, Scherf S et al (2000) CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:165–172PubMedCrossRef

Boas FE, Fleischmann D (2011) Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. Radiology 259:894–902PubMedCrossRef

10.

Morsbach F, Bickelhaupt S, Wanner GA et al (2013) Reduction of metal artifacts from hip prostheses on CT images of the pelvis: value of iterative reconstructions. Radiology 268:237–244PubMedCrossRef

11.

Malan DF, Botha CP, Kraaij G et al (2012) Measuring femoral lesions despite CT metal artefacts: a cadaveric study. Skeletal Radiol 41:547–555PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

12.

Liu P, Pavlicek W, Peter M et al (2009) Metal artifact reduction image reconstruction algorithm for CT of implanted metal orthopedic devices: a work in progress. Skeletal Radiol 38:797–802PubMedCrossRef

13.

Lee YH, Park KK, Song HT et al (2012) Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software. Eur Radiol 22:1331–1340PubMedCrossRef

14.

Lewis M, Reid K, Toms AP (2013) Reducing the effects of metal artefact using high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT (DECT) in hip replacements. Skeletal Radiol 42:275–282PubMedCrossRef

15.

Pessis E, Campagna R, Sverzut JM et al (2013) Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: reduction of metal artifacts at CT. Radiographics 33:573–583PubMedCrossRef

16.

Schenck JF (1996) The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23:815–850PubMedCrossRef

17.

Hargreaves BA, Worters PW, Pauly KB et al (2011) Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:547–555PubMedCrossRef

18.

Graf H, Lauer UA, Berger A et al (2005) RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study. Magn Reson Imaging 23:493–499PubMedCrossRef

19.

Cho ZH, Kim DJ, Kim YK (1988) Total inhomogeneity correction including chemical shifts and susceptibility by view angle tilting. Med Phys 15:7–11PubMedCrossRef

20.

Butts K, Pauly JM, Gold GE (2005) Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI. Magn Reson Med 53:418–424PubMedCrossRef

21.

Koch KM, Lorbiecki JE, Hinks RS et al (2009) A multispectral three-dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants. Magn Reson Med 61:381–390PubMedCrossRef

22.

Lu W, Pauly KB, Gold GE et al (2009) SEMAC: slice encoding for metal artifact correction in MRI. Magn Reson Med 62:66–76PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

23.

Sutter R, Hodek R, Fucentese SF et al (2013) Total knee arthroplasty MRI featuring slice-encoding for metal artifact correction: reduction of artifacts for STIR and proton density-weighted sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:1315–1324PubMedCrossRef

24.

Sutter R, Ulbrich EJ, Jellus V et al (2012) Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting MR imaging. Radiology 265:204–214PubMedCrossRef

25.

Gold GE, Thedens DR, Pauly JM et al (1998) MR imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: new methods using ultrashort TEs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1223–1226PubMedCrossRef

26.

Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Park JY et al (2006) Fast and quiet MRI using a swept radiofrequency. J Magn Reson 181:342–349PubMedCrossRef

27.

Melvin JS, Karthikeyan T, Cope R, Fehring TK (2013) Early failures in total hip arthroplasty – a changing paradigm. J Arthroplasty 29:1285–1288PubMedCrossRef

28.

Manaster BJ (1996) From the RSNA refresher courses. Total hip arthroplasty: radiographic evaluation. Radiographics 16:645–660PubMedCrossRef

29.

Cooper HJ, Ranawat AS, Potter HG et al (2010) Early reactive synovitis and osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3278–3285PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

30.

Gallo J, Goodman SB, Konttinen YT et al (2013) Particle disease: biologic mechanisms of periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. Innate Immun 19:213–224PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

31.

Leung S, Naudie D, Kitamura N et al (2005) Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:592–597PubMedCrossRef

32.

Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH et al (2002) Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:609–614

33.

Cahir JG, Toms AP, Marshall TJ et al (2007) CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol 62:1163–1171PubMedCrossRef

34.

White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M et al (2000) Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging – initial experience. Radiology 215:254–262PubMedCrossRef

35.

Walde TA, Weiland DE, Leung SB et al (2005) Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:138–144PubMedCrossRef

36.

Chang JD, Lee SS, Hur M et al (2005) Revision total hip arthroplasty in hip joints with metallosis: a single-center experience with 31 cases. J Arthroplasty 20:568–573PubMedCrossRef

37.

Heffernan EJ, Alkubaidan FO, Nielsen TO et al (2008) The imaging appearances of metallosis. Skeletal Radiol 37:59–62PubMedCrossRef

38.

Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME et al (2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:171–177

39.

Fisher J, Jin Z, Tipper J et al (2006) Tribology of alternative bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:25–34PubMedCrossRef

40.

Lhotka C, Szekeres T, Steffan I et al (2003) Four-year study of cobalt and chromium blood levels in patients managed with two different metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 21:189–195PubMedCrossRef

41.

Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A et al (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:28–36PubMedCrossRef

42.

Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, Mclardy-Smith P et al (2008) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:847–851PubMedCrossRef

43.

Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Nelson S et al (2010) Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2321–2327PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

44.

Chang EY, Mcanally JL, Van Horne JR et al (2012) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: do symptoms correlate with MR imaging findings? Radiology 265:848–857PubMedCrossRef

45.

Van Der Weegen W, Brakel K, Horn RJ et al (2014) Comparison of different pseudotumor grading systems in a single cohort of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients. Skeletal Radiol 43:149–155CrossRef

46.

Anderson H, Toms AP, Cahir JG et al (2011) Grading the severity of soft tissue changes associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements: reliability of an MR grading system. Skeletal Radiol 40:303–307PubMedCrossRef

47.

Clohisy JC, Calvert G, Tull F et al (2004) Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:188–192CrossRef

48.

Cyteval C, Hamm V, Sarrabere MP et al (2002) Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis: CT imaging. Radiology 224:477–483PubMedCrossRef

49.

Potter H, Foo L, Nestor B (2005) What is the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty? HSS J 1:89–93PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

50.

Potter HG, Foo LF (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 37:361–373, vi–viiPubMedCrossRef

51.

Singh JA, Jensen MR, Harmsen SW et al (2013) Are gender, comorbidity, and obesity risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 28:126–131.e1–e2PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

52.

Hoffmann A, Pfirrmann CWA (2012) The hip abductors at MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 81:3755–3762PubMedCrossRef

53.

Pfirrmann CW, Notzli HP, Dora C et al (2005) Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Radiology 235:969–976PubMedCrossRef

54.

Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Berry DJ (1995) Anterior iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:546–549PubMedCrossRef

55.

Neal B, Gray H, Macmahon S et al (2002) Incidence of heterotopic bone formation after major hip surgery. ANZ J Surg 72:808–821PubMedCrossRef

56.

Bedi A, Zbeda RM, Bueno VF et al (2012) The incidence of heterotopic ossification after hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 40:854–863PubMedCrossRef

57.

Seegenschmiedt MH, Goldmann AR, Martus P et al (1993) Prophylactic radiation therapy for prevention of heterotopic ossification after hip arthroplasty: results in 141 high-risk hips. Radiology 188:257–264PubMedCrossRef

58.

Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA et al (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632PubMed

59.

Ledermann HP, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB (2002) Pelvic heterotopic ossification: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 222:189–195PubMedCrossRef

Titel: CT und MRT der Hüftprothese
verfasst von: Dr. C.A. Agten
R. Sutter
C.W.A. Pfirrmann
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Die Radiologie / Ausgabe 7/2014
Print ISSN: 2731-7048
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7056
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-014-2693-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

23.04.2024 | Pankreaskarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

CT und MRT der Hüftprothese

Zusammenfassung

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2014

Operative Therapie des hepatozellulären Karzinoms

Nationale S3-Leitlinie hepatozelluläres Karzinom

Bildgebungsmodalitäten und Therapieoptionen bei Patienten mit akutem Flankenschmerz

Epidemiologie und Risikofaktoren des hepatozellulären Karzinoms

Rationale Schnittbildgebung des hepatozellulären Karzinoms

Ein ungewöhnlicher Sondierungsweg zur Anlage eines Gastrotubes

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie