Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Diabetologia 5/2008

01.05.2008 | Article

Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program: evaluation of assays for autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and islet antigen-2

verfasst von: C. Törn, P. W. Mueller, M. Schlosser, E. Bonifacio, P. J. Bingley, Participating Laboratories

Erschienen in: Diabetologia | Ausgabe 5/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Islet autoantibodies are important in diabetes classification and risk assessment, and as endpoints in observational studies. The Diabetes Autoantibody Standardization Program (DASP) aims to improve and standardise measurement of autoantibodies associated with type 1 diabetes. We report results for glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA) and islet antigen-2 autoantibodies (IA-2A) from three DASP workshops (2002–2005).

Methods

Up to 60 laboratories in 18 countries participated in each workshop. Participants received coded serum aliquots from 50 patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (median age 18 years, range 9–35 years) and 100 blood donor controls. Results were analysed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves with sensitivity adjusted to 95% specificity in workshop controls.

Results

GADA assays performed well in all three workshops (median area under the ROC curve [AUC] 0.94; interquartile range 0.91–0.95) and performance was similar to DASP 2000. Performance of IA-2A assays improved over the workshop programme. Median AUC was 0.81 (interquartile range 0.79–0.83) in DASP 2002, 0.82 (interquartile range 0.78–0.84) in 2003, and 0.85 (interquartile range 0.82–0.87) in 2005 (p < 0.0001). Performance of GADA ELISA improved between 2002 and 2005, and, in DASP 2005, achieved higher median AUC and adjusted sensitivity than RIA. IA-2A ELISA improved and, in DASP 2005, achieved AUCs equivalent to in-house RIA. Assays using IA-2ic or full length IA-2 clones were more sensitive than those using IA-2bdc, with higher AUC (p = 0.004).

Conclusions/interpretation

GADA and IA-2A assays perform well in discriminating health and disease. The workshop format highlights systematic differences related to assay method and allows full evaluation of novel methods. The programme of autoantibody workshops in type 1 diabetes provides a model for other autoimmune diseases.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (1997) Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 20:1183–1197 The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (1997) Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 20:1183–1197
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner R, Stratton I, Horton V et al (1997) Autoantibodies to islet cell cytoplasm and glutamic acid decarboxylase for prediction of insulin requirement in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 350:1288–1293PubMedCrossRef Turner R, Stratton I, Horton V et al (1997) Autoantibodies to islet cell cytoplasm and glutamic acid decarboxylase for prediction of insulin requirement in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 350:1288–1293PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat The European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial group (2004) European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial (ENDIT): a randomised controlled trial of intervention before the onset of type 1 diabetes. Lancet 363:925–931CrossRef The European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial group (2004) European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial (ENDIT): a randomised controlled trial of intervention before the onset of type 1 diabetes. Lancet 363:925–931CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagopian WA, Lernmark AKE, Rewers MJ et al (2006) TEDDY—The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young: an observational clinical trial. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1079:320–326PubMedCrossRef Hagopian WA, Lernmark AKE, Rewers MJ et al (2006) TEDDY—The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young: an observational clinical trial. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1079:320–326PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bottazzo GF, Gleichmann H (1986) Immunology and Diabetes Workshops: report of the first international workshop on standardisation of cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies. Diabetologia 29:125–126CrossRef Bottazzo GF, Gleichmann H (1986) Immunology and Diabetes Workshops: report of the first international workshop on standardisation of cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies. Diabetologia 29:125–126CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonifacio E, Boitard C, Gleichmann H et al (1990) Assessment of precision, concordance, specificity, and sensitivity of islet cell antibody measurements in 41 assays. Diabetologia 33:731–736PubMedCrossRef Bonifacio E, Boitard C, Gleichmann H et al (1990) Assessment of precision, concordance, specificity, and sensitivity of islet cell antibody measurements in 41 assays. Diabetologia 33:731–736PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Verge CF, Stenger D, Bonifacio E et al (1998) Combined use of autoantibodies (IA-2 autoantibody, GAD autoantibody, insulin autoantibody, cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies) in type 1 diabetes: Combinatorial Islet Autoantibody Workshop. Diabetes 47:1857–1866PubMedCrossRef Verge CF, Stenger D, Bonifacio E et al (1998) Combined use of autoantibodies (IA-2 autoantibody, GAD autoantibody, insulin autoantibody, cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies) in type 1 diabetes: Combinatorial Islet Autoantibody Workshop. Diabetes 47:1857–1866PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mire-Sluis AR, Gaines Das R, Lernmark A, Participants of the study (2000) The World Health Organization International Collaborative Study for islet cell antibodies. Diabetologia 43:1282–1292PubMedCrossRef Mire-Sluis AR, Gaines Das R, Lernmark A, Participants of the study (2000) The World Health Organization International Collaborative Study for islet cell antibodies. Diabetologia 43:1282–1292PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bingley PJ, Bonifacio E, Mueller PW, Participating Laboratories (2003) Diabetes antibody standardization program: first assay proficiency evaluation. Diabetes 52:1128–1136PubMedCrossRef Bingley PJ, Bonifacio E, Mueller PW, Participating Laboratories (2003) Diabetes antibody standardization program: first assay proficiency evaluation. Diabetes 52:1128–1136PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonifacio E, Cobain TJ, Dawkins RL et al (1988) Comparison and standardization of measurement of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody between laboratories. Autoimmunity 1:59–66PubMedCrossRef Bonifacio E, Cobain TJ, Dawkins RL et al (1988) Comparison and standardization of measurement of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody between laboratories. Autoimmunity 1:59–66PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stern M, Working Group on Serologic Screening for Celiac Disease (2000) Comparative evaluation of serologic tests for celiac disease: a European initiative toward standardization. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 31:513–519PubMedCrossRef Stern M, Working Group on Serologic Screening for Celiac Disease (2000) Comparative evaluation of serologic tests for celiac disease: a European initiative toward standardization. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 31:513–519PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagen EC, Andrassy K, Chernok E et al (1993) The value of indirect immunofluorescence and solid phase techniques for ANCA detection. A report on the first phase of an international cooperative study on the standardization of ANCA assays. EEC/BCR Group for ANCA Assay Standardization. J Immunol Methods 159:1–16PubMedCrossRef Hagen EC, Andrassy K, Chernok E et al (1993) The value of indirect immunofluorescence and solid phase techniques for ANCA detection. A report on the first phase of an international cooperative study on the standardization of ANCA assays. EEC/BCR Group for ANCA Assay Standardization. J Immunol Methods 159:1–16PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan EK, Fritzler MJ, Wiik A et al (2007) IUIS/WHO/AF/CDC Committee for the Standardization of Autoantibodies in Rheumatic and Related Diseases. AutoAbSC.Org—Autoantibody Standardization Committee in 2006. Autoimmun Rev 6:577–580PubMedCrossRef Chan EK, Fritzler MJ, Wiik A et al (2007) IUIS/WHO/AF/CDC Committee for the Standardization of Autoantibodies in Rheumatic and Related Diseases. AutoAbSC.Org—Autoantibody Standardization Committee in 2006. Autoimmun Rev 6:577–580PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenbaum CJ, Palmer JP, Kuglin B, Kolb H, Participating laboratories (1992) Insulin autoantibodies measured by radioimmunoassay methodology are more related to insulin dependent diabetes mellitus than those measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: results of the fourth international workshop on the standardization of insulin autoantibody measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:1040–1044PubMedCrossRef Greenbaum CJ, Palmer JP, Kuglin B, Kolb H, Participating laboratories (1992) Insulin autoantibodies measured by radioimmunoassay methodology are more related to insulin dependent diabetes mellitus than those measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: results of the fourth international workshop on the standardization of insulin autoantibody measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:1040–1044PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dittler J, Seidel D, Schenker M, Ziegler AG (1998) GADIA2-combi determination as first line screening for improved prediction of type 1 diabetes in relatives. Diabetes 47:592–597PubMedCrossRef Dittler J, Seidel D, Schenker M, Ziegler AG (1998) GADIA2-combi determination as first line screening for improved prediction of type 1 diabetes in relatives. Diabetes 47:592–597PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Seissler J, Morgenthaler NG, Achenbach P et al (1996) Combined screening for autoantibodies to IA-2 and antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in first degree relatives of patients with IDDM. Diabetologia 39:1351–1356PubMedCrossRef Seissler J, Morgenthaler NG, Achenbach P et al (1996) Combined screening for autoantibodies to IA-2 and antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in first degree relatives of patients with IDDM. Diabetologia 39:1351–1356PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonifacio E, Genovese S, Braghi S et al (1995) Islet autoantibody markers in IDDM: risk assessment strategies yielding high sensitivity. Diabetologia 38:816–822PubMedCrossRef Bonifacio E, Genovese S, Braghi S et al (1995) Islet autoantibody markers in IDDM: risk assessment strategies yielding high sensitivity. Diabetologia 38:816–822PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach P, Schlosser M, Williams AJK et al (2007) Combined testing of antibody titer and affinity improves insulin autoantibody measurement: Diabetes antibody standardization program. Clin Immunol 122:85–90PubMedCrossRef Achenbach P, Schlosser M, Williams AJK et al (2007) Combined testing of antibody titer and affinity improves insulin autoantibody measurement: Diabetes antibody standardization program. Clin Immunol 122:85–90PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program: evaluation of assays for autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and islet antigen-2
verfasst von
C. Törn
P. W. Mueller
M. Schlosser
E. Bonifacio
P. J. Bingley
Participating Laboratories
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Diabetologia / Ausgabe 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-0967-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2008

Diabetologia 5/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.