nach oben

Intensive Care Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.12.2004 | Original

Performance of two measures of general health-related quality of life, the EQ-5D and the RAND-36 among critically ill patients

verfasst von: Anne Kaarlola, Ville Pettilä, Pertti Kekki

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 12/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To compare two health-related quality of life measures, the preference-based EQ-5D with five questions and the profile-based RAND-36 with 36 questions, in previous critically ill patients.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting

A ten-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a tertiary care university hospital.

Patients

Of the 2,709 critically ill patients, treated during the years 1995–2000, the 1,099 patients of the 1,443 still alive who returned both mailed measures were included in the study.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and main results

The EQ-5D and the RAND-36 correlated well (P <.001). Ceiling effect was more obvious with the EQ-5D; the values of the RAND-36 varied usually from 0 to 100 in all the three levels of the corresponding EQ-5D question, and the weakest statistically significant differences were between the EQ levels 2 and 3. In particular, the RAND-36 proved to differentiate better the levels of mobility, self-care, and poor outcome.

Conclusions

The EQ-5D and the RAND-36 correlated well, but when more precisely stated information is needed, especially regarding mobility, self-care, or low quality of life levels of previous critically ill patients, the profile-based RAND-36 may discriminate better.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Angus DC, Carlet J (2003) Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable. Intensive Care Med 29:368–377PubMed

Black NA, Jenkinson C, Hayes JA, Young D, Vella K, Rowan KW, Daly K, Ridley S (2001) Review of outcome measures used in adult critical care. Crit Care Med 29:2119–2124CrossRefPubMed

Bowling A (1997) Evaluating health services: multidisciplinary collaboration. In: Research methods in health care. Open University, Buckingham Philadelphia, pp 6–15

Garrett A, Schmidt L, Macintosh A, Fitzpatric R (2002) Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patients assessed health outcome measure. BMJ 324:1417CrossRefPubMed

Jones I (1997) Costing health services: health economics. In: Bowling A (ed) Research methods in health care. Open University, Buckingham Philadelphia, pp 79–97

Kutsogiannis DJ, Noseworthy T (2001) Health-related quality of life; during and following critical care. In: Sibbald JW, Bion JF (eds) Evaluating critical care. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 86–103

Kerridge RK, Glasziou PP, Hillman KM (1995) The use of “quality-adjusted life years” (QALYs) to evaluate treatment in intensive care. Anaesth Intens Care 23:322–331

Heyland DK, Guyatt G, Cook DJ, Meade M, Juniper E, Cronin L, Gafni A (1998) Frequency and methodological rigor of quality of life assessments in the critical care literature. Crit Care Med 26:591–598PubMed

Patrick DL, Danis M, Southerland LI, Hong G (1988) Quality of life following intensive care. J Gen Intern Med 3:218–223PubMed

10.

Bergner M, Robbitt RA, Kressel S, Pollard WE, Gibson BS, Morris JR (1981) The sickness impact profile. Development and final version of health status measure. Med Care 19:787–805PubMed

11.

Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E (1981) The Nottingham health profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med 15:221–229

12.

Ware MK, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 Health survey: manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, Boston

13.

Kind P, Rosser RM, Williams A (1982) Valuation of quality of life; some psychometric evidence. In: Jones-Lee MW (ed) The value of life and safety. Elsevier, Amsterdam

14.

Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, Chesterman E, Levi J, Shepherd R, Battista RN, Catchlove BR (1981) Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise Quality of Life Index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis 34:585–597CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel R (1993) The RAND 36-item HEALTH survey 1.0. Health Econ 2:217–277PubMed

16.

Brooks R (1996) EuroQol; the current state of Play. Health Policy 37:53–72CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bowling A (1997) The principles of research. In: Research methods in health care. Open University, Buckingham Philadelphia, pp 130–138

18.

Johnson JA, Ohinmaa A, Murti B, Sintonen H, Coons SJ (2000) Comparison of Finnish and U.S-based Visual Analog Scale Valuations of the EQ-5D measure. Med Decis Making 20:281–289PubMed

19.

Ohinmaa A, Sintonen H (1996) Quality of life of Finnish population measures by EuroQol. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Segura A (eds) EuroQol, Plenary Meeting. Barcelona 1995, 3–5 October. Discussion papers, Catalan Institute of Public Health, Barcelona, pp 161–172

20.

Aalto A, Aro S, Aro AR, Mähönen M (1999) RAND 36-item Survey 1.0. Finnish version. STAKES (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health), Helsinki

21.

Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD (2000) A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 17:13–35PubMed

22.

Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales. A user’s manual. Health Assessment Lab, Boston MA

23.

Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829PubMed

24.

Myers C, Wilks D (1999) Comparison of Euroqol EQ-5D and SF-36 in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Qual Life Res 8:9–16CrossRefPubMed

25.

Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P (1993) Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2:169–180PubMed

26.

Bosch JL, Hunink MG (2000) Comparison of the Health Utilities index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication. Qual Life Res 9:591–601CrossRefPubMed

27.

McHorney CA, Taylor AR (1995) Individual patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307PubMed

28.

Badia X, Diaz-Prieto A, Gorriz MT, Herdman R, Torrado H, Farrero E, Cavanilles JM (2001) Using EuroQol-5D to measure changes in quality of life 12 months after discharge from an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 27:1901–1907CrossRefPubMed

29.

Jenkinson C, Stradling J, Petersen S (1998) How should we evaluate health status? A comparison of three methods in patients presenting with obstructive sleep apnea. Qual Life Res 7:95–100CrossRefPubMed

30.

Johnson JA, Coons SJ (1998) Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in adult US sample. Qual Life Res 7:155–166CrossRefPubMed

31.

Granja C, Teixeira-Pinto A, Costa-Pereira A (2002) Quality of life after intensive care - evaluation with EQ-5D questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 28:898–907CrossRefPubMed

32.

Kaarlola A, Pettilä V, Kekki P (2003) Quality of life six years after intensive care. Intensive Care Med 29:1294–1299CrossRefPubMed

33.

Bosch JL, van der Graaf J, Hunink MGM (1999) Health-related quality of life after angioplasty and stent placement in patients with iliac artery disease; results of the randomised controlled clinical trial. Circulation 99:3155–3160PubMed

34.

Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Barr A, Cook D, Slutsky AS (2003) One-year outcome in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:683–693CrossRefPubMed

35.

Schelling G, Richter M, Roozendaal B, Rothenhäusler HB, Krauseneck T, Stoll C, Nollert G, Schmidt M, Kapfhammer HP (2003) Exposure to high stress in the intensive care unit may have negative effects on health-related quality-of-life outcome after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med 31:1971–1980CrossRefPubMed

36.

Cornock MA (1998) Stress and the intensive care patient: perceptions of patients and nurses. J Adv Nurs 27:518–527CrossRefPubMed

37.

Scragg P, Jones A, Fauvel N (2001) Psychological problems following ICU treatment. Anaesthesia 56:9–14CrossRefPubMed

38.

Schelling G, Stoll C, Haller M, Briegel J, Manert W, Hummel T, Lenhart A, Heyduck M, Polasek J, Meier M, Preuss U, Bullinger M, Schuffel W, Peter K (1998) Health-related quality of life and posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 26:651–659CrossRefPubMed

39.

Skogstad W (2000) Working in the world of bodies. A medical ward. In: Hinshelwood RD, Skogstad W (eds) Observing organisations. Anxiety, defence and culture in health care. Routledge, London, pp 101–121

40.

Bion WR (1961) Experiences in groups. Routledge, Bristol, pp 59–75

Titel: Performance of two measures of general health-related quality of life, the EQ-5D and the RAND-36 among critically ill patients
verfasst von: Anne Kaarlola
Ville Pettilä
Pertti Kekki
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2004
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 12/2004
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2471-6

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Performance of two measures of general health-related quality of life, the EQ-5D and the RAND-36 among critically ill patients

Abstract

Objective

Design

Setting

Patients

Interventions

Measurements and main results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Diclofenac-Gel versus Ibuprofen bei akuten Rückenschmerzen

Update AINS

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objective

Design

Setting

Patients

Interventions

Measurements and main results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2004

Central venous catheters and cardiac tamponade in preterm infants

Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients

December 2004

Changes in lung volume with three systems of endotracheal suctioning with and without pre-oxygenation in patients with mild-to-moderate lung failure

Matching total body oxygen consumption and delivery: a crucial objective?

Dying at the end of your life

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Diclofenac-Gel versus Ibuprofen bei akuten Rückenschmerzen

Update AINS