Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 11/2006

01.11.2006 | Original

Validation of the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer in need of intensive care

verfasst von: Márcio Soares, Jorge I. F. Salluh

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 11/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To validate the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Design

Cohort study.

Setting

Ten-bed medical–surgical oncologic ICU.

Patients and participants

Nine hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients admitted over a 3-year period.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and results

Data were prospectively collected at admission of ICU. SAPS II and SAPS 3 scores with respective estimated mortality rates were calculated. Discrimination was assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves and calibration by Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The mean age was 58.3 ± 23.1 years; there were 471 (49%) scheduled surgical, 348 (37%) medical and 133 (14%) emergency surgical patients. ICU and hospital mortality rates were 24.6% and 33.5%, respectively. The mean SAPS 3 and SAPS II scores were 52.3 ± 18.5 points and 35.3 ± 20.7 points, respectively. All prognostic models showed excellent discrimination (AUROC ≥ 0.8). The calibration of SAPS II was poor (p < 0.001). However, the calibration of standard SAPS 3 and its customized equation for Central and South American (CSA) countries were appropriate (p > 0.05). SAPS II and standard SAPS 3 prognostic models tended somewhat to underestimate the observed mortality (SMR > 1). However, when the customized equation was used, the estimated mortality was closer to the observed mortality [SMR = 0.95 (95% CI = 0.84–1.07)]. Similar results were observed when scheduled surgical patients were excluded.

Conclusions

The SAPS 3 admission prognostic model at ICU admission, in particular its customized equation for CSA, was accurate in our cohort of critically ill patients with cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Gall J-R, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963PubMedCrossRef Le Gall J-R, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829PubMed Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin JS, Gehlbach SH, Rapoport J (1993) Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270:2478–2486PubMedCrossRef Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin JS, Gehlbach SH, Rapoport J (1993) Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 270:2478–2486PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A, Harrel FE (1991) The APACHE III Prognostic System. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636PubMed Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A, Harrel FE (1991) The APACHE III Prognostic System. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Soares M, Fontes F, Dantas J, Gadelha D, Cariello P, Nardes F, Amorim C, Toscano L, Rocco JR (2004) Performance of six severity-of-illness scores in cancer patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit: A prospective observational study. Crit Care 8:R194–R203PubMedCrossRef Soares M, Fontes F, Dantas J, Gadelha D, Cariello P, Nardes F, Amorim C, Toscano L, Rocco JR (2004) Performance of six severity-of-illness scores in cancer patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit: A prospective observational study. Crit Care 8:R194–R203PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Groeger JS, Lemeshow S, Price K, Nierman DM, White P, Klar J, Granovsky S, Horak D, Kish SK (1998) Multicenter outcome study of cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a probability of mortality model. J Clin Oncol 16:761–770PubMed Groeger JS, Lemeshow S, Price K, Nierman DM, White P, Klar J, Granovsky S, Horak D, Kish SK (1998) Multicenter outcome study of cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a probability of mortality model. J Clin Oncol 16:761–770PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sculier J-P, Paesmans M, Markiewicz E, Berghmans T (2000) Scoring systems in cancer patients admitted for an acute complication in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 28:2786–2792PubMedCrossRef Sculier J-P, Paesmans M, Markiewicz E, Berghmans T (2000) Scoring systems in cancer patients admitted for an acute complication in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 28:2786–2792PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schellongowski P, Benesch M, Lang T, Traunmüller F, Zauner C, Laczika K, Locker GJ, Frass M, Staudinger T (2004) Comparison of three severity scores for critically ill cancer patients. Intensive Care Med 30:430–436PubMedCrossRef Schellongowski P, Benesch M, Lang T, Traunmüller F, Zauner C, Laczika K, Locker GJ, Frass M, Staudinger T (2004) Comparison of three severity scores for critically ill cancer patients. Intensive Care Med 30:430–436PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat den Boer S, de Keizer NF, de Jonge E (2005) Performance of prognostic models in critically ill cancer patients—a review. Crit Care 9:R458–R463 den Boer S, de Keizer NF, de Jonge E (2005) Performance of prognostic models in critically ill cancer patients—a review. Crit Care 9:R458–R463
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Berghmans T, Paesmans M, Sculier JP (2004) Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores? Support Care Cancer 12:234–239PubMedCrossRef Berghmans T, Paesmans M, Sculier JP (2004) Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores? Support Care Cancer 12:234–239PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Metnitz PGH, Moreno RP, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, Iapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall JR, SAPS 3 Investigators (2005) SAPS 3 – From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description. Intensive Care Med 31:1336–1344PubMedCrossRef Metnitz PGH, Moreno RP, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, Iapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall JR, SAPS 3 Investigators (2005) SAPS 3 – From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description. Intensive Care Med 31:1336–1344PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno RP, Metnitz PGH, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, Iapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall JR, SAPS 3 Investigators (2005) SAPS 3 – From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 31:1345–1355PubMedCrossRef Moreno RP, Metnitz PGH, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, Iapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall JR, SAPS 3 Investigators (2005) SAPS 3 – From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 31:1345–1355PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710PubMed Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW (1982) A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression model. Am J Epidemiol 115:92–106PubMed Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW (1982) A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression model. Am J Epidemiol 115:92–106PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Thiery G, Azoulay E, Darmon M, Ciroldi M, De Miranda S, Levy V, Fieux F, Moreau D, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B (2005) Outcome of cancer patients considered for intensive care unit admission: a hospital-wide prospective study. J Clin Oncol 23:4406–4413PubMedCrossRef Thiery G, Azoulay E, Darmon M, Ciroldi M, De Miranda S, Levy V, Fieux F, Moreau D, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B (2005) Outcome of cancer patients considered for intensive care unit admission: a hospital-wide prospective study. J Clin Oncol 23:4406–4413PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Validation of the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer in need of intensive care
verfasst von
Márcio Soares
Jorge I. F. Salluh
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2006
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 11/2006
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0374-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2006

Intensive Care Medicine 11/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.