Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 10/2018

27.09.2018 | Review

Conflicts of interest disclosure forms and management in critical care clinical practice guidelines

verfasst von: Waleed Alhazzani, Kimberley Lewis, Roman Jaeschke, Bram Rochwerg, Morten Hylander Møller, Laura Evans, Kevin C. Wilson, Sheena Patel, Craig M. Coopersmith, Maurizio Cecconi, Gordon Guyatt, Elie A. Akl

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Trustworthy clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) require identification and careful management of conflicts of interest (COIs) among all participants in the guideline development. Furthermore, COIs are more common than anticipated. However, there are no universally accepted methods to identify and manage COIs.

Objective

To describe and summarize the current COI disclosure forms and management policies in selected critical care professional societies that develop high-impact CPGs. In addition, we aim to provide suggestions to guideline developers on how to identify and manage different types of COIs.

Methods

We searched PubMed and MEDLINE for CPGs published between 2013 and 2018 in English language and addressed general critical care topics. We then ranked the CPGs according to the numbers of citations and selected the first five critical care professional societies that sponsored the guidelines. We obtained the most recent COI declaration forms and management policies. Two reviewers abstracted data on different types of COI in each of the disclosure forms and management policies.

Results

All selected professional critical care societies require that members declare direct financial COIs; four societies inquire specifically about intellectual COIs (involvement in primary research). Three out of five societies require members to disclose indirect institutional financial COIs; however, none inquire about other forms of institutional COI. We developed, by consensus, a streamlined framework to classify and manage different types of COIs.

Conclusion

The current COI disclosure forms of selected professional societies provide more attention to financial disclosures and COIs and less attention to detecting and managing intellectual COIs, while rarely addressing institutional COIs. We provide some suggestions for guideline developers on the classification and management of different COIs in the context of CPGs.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926CrossRef Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Schunemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I et al (2014) Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ 186(3):E123–E142CrossRef Schunemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I et al (2014) Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ 186(3):E123–E142CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E (eds) (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. National Academies Press, Washington (DC) Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E (eds) (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. National Academies Press, Washington (DC)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schunemann HJ, Osborne M, Moss J et al (2009) An official American Thoracic Society Policy statement: managing conflict of interest in professional societies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180(6):564–580CrossRef Schunemann HJ, Osborne M, Moss J et al (2009) An official American Thoracic Society Policy statement: managing conflict of interest in professional societies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180(6):564–580CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schunemann HJ, Al-Ansary LA, Forland F et al (2015) Guidelines international network: principles for disclosure of interests and management of conflicts in guidelines. Ann Intern Med 163(7):548–553CrossRef Schunemann HJ, Al-Ansary LA, Forland F et al (2015) Guidelines international network: principles for disclosure of interests and management of conflicts in guidelines. Ann Intern Med 163(7):548–553CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Norris SL, Burda BU, Holmer HK et al (2012) Author’s specialty and conflicts of interest contribute to conflicting guidelines for screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol 65(7):725–733CrossRef Norris SL, Burda BU, Holmer HK et al (2012) Author’s specialty and conflicts of interest contribute to conflicting guidelines for screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol 65(7):725–733CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lenzer J (2002) Alteplase for stroke: money and optimistic claims buttress the “brain attack” campaign. BMJ 324(7339):723–729CrossRef Lenzer J (2002) Alteplase for stroke: money and optimistic claims buttress the “brain attack” campaign. BMJ 324(7339):723–729CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Eichacker PQ, Natanson C, Danner RL (2006) Surviving sepsis–practice guidelines, marketing campaigns, and Eli Lilly. New Engl J Med 355(16):1640–1642CrossRef Eichacker PQ, Natanson C, Danner RL (2006) Surviving sepsis–practice guidelines, marketing campaigns, and Eli Lilly. New Engl J Med 355(16):1640–1642CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43(3):304–377CrossRef Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43(3):304–377CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39(2):165–228CrossRef Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39(2):165–228CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM et al (2008) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med 34(1):17–60CrossRef Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM et al (2008) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med 34(1):17–60CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Akl EA, Hirsh J et al (2010) The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution. Ann Intern Med 152(11):738–741CrossRef Guyatt G, Akl EA, Hirsh J et al (2010) The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution. Ann Intern Med 152(11):738–741CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Akl EA, El-Hachem P, Abou-Haidar H, Neumann I, Schunemann HJ, Guyatt GH (2014) Considering intellectual, in addition to financial, conflicts of interest proved important in a clinical practice guideline: a descriptive study. J Clin Epidemiol 67(11):1222–1228CrossRef Akl EA, El-Hachem P, Abou-Haidar H, Neumann I, Schunemann HJ, Guyatt GH (2014) Considering intellectual, in addition to financial, conflicts of interest proved important in a clinical practice guideline: a descriptive study. J Clin Epidemiol 67(11):1222–1228CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Akl EA, Karl R, Guyatt GH (2012) Methodologists and context experts disagreed regarding managing conflicts of interest of clinical practice guidelines panels. J Clin Epidemiol 65(7):734–739CrossRef Akl EA, Karl R, Guyatt GH (2012) Methodologists and context experts disagreed regarding managing conflicts of interest of clinical practice guidelines panels. J Clin Epidemiol 65(7):734–739CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Okike K, Kocher MS, Wei EX, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M (2009) Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians. New Engl J Med 361(15):1466–1474CrossRef Okike K, Kocher MS, Wei EX, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M (2009) Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians. New Engl J Med 361(15):1466–1474CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuman J, Korenstein D, Ross JS, Keyhani S (2011) Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional study. BMJ 343:d5621CrossRef Neuman J, Korenstein D, Ross JS, Keyhani S (2011) Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional study. BMJ 343:d5621CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Norris SL, Holmer HK, Ogden LA, Selph SS, Fu R (2012) Conflict of interest disclosures for clinical practice guidelines in the national guideline clearinghouse. PLoS One 7(11):e47343CrossRef Norris SL, Holmer HK, Ogden LA, Selph SS, Fu R (2012) Conflict of interest disclosures for clinical practice guidelines in the national guideline clearinghouse. PLoS One 7(11):e47343CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Norris SL, Holmer HK, Burda BU, Ogden LA, Fu R (2012) Conflict of interest policies for organizations producing a large number of clinical practice guidelines. PLoS One 7(5):e37413CrossRef Norris SL, Holmer HK, Burda BU, Ogden LA, Fu R (2012) Conflict of interest policies for organizations producing a large number of clinical practice guidelines. PLoS One 7(5):e37413CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Neumann I, Akl EA, Valdes M et al (2013) Low anonymous voting compliance with the novel policy for managing conflicts of interest implemented in the 9th version of the American College of Chest Physicians antithrombotic guidelines. Chest 144(4):1111–1116CrossRef Neumann I, Akl EA, Valdes M et al (2013) Low anonymous voting compliance with the novel policy for managing conflicts of interest implemented in the 9th version of the American College of Chest Physicians antithrombotic guidelines. Chest 144(4):1111–1116CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakoum MB, Anouti S, Al-Gibbawi M et al (2016) Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey. BMJ Open 6(8):e011997CrossRef Hakoum MB, Anouti S, Al-Gibbawi M et al (2016) Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey. BMJ Open 6(8):e011997CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakoum MB, Jouni N, Abou-Jaoude EA et al (2017) Authors of clinical trials reported individual and financial conflicts of interest more frequently than institutional and nonfinancial ones: a methodological survey. J Clin Epidemiol 87:78–86CrossRef Hakoum MB, Jouni N, Abou-Jaoude EA et al (2017) Authors of clinical trials reported individual and financial conflicts of interest more frequently than institutional and nonfinancial ones: a methodological survey. J Clin Epidemiol 87:78–86CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirsh J, Guyatt G, Albers GW, Harrington R, Schunemann HJ (2008) Executive summary: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133(6 Suppl):71S–109SCrossRef Hirsh J, Guyatt G, Albers GW, Harrington R, Schunemann HJ (2008) Executive summary: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133(6 Suppl):71S–109SCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Schunemann HJ, Gutterman DD, Lewis SZ (2012) Introduction to the ninth edition: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 141(2 Suppl):48S–52SCrossRef Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Schunemann HJ, Gutterman DD, Lewis SZ (2012) Introduction to the ninth edition: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 141(2 Suppl):48S–52SCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Agoritsas T, Neumann I, Mendoza C, Guyatt GH (2017) Guideline conflict of interest management and methodology heavily impacts on the strength of recommendations: comparison between two iterations of the American College of Chest Physicians antithrombotic guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 81:141–143CrossRef Agoritsas T, Neumann I, Mendoza C, Guyatt GH (2017) Guideline conflict of interest management and methodology heavily impacts on the strength of recommendations: comparison between two iterations of the American College of Chest Physicians antithrombotic guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 81:141–143CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Conflicts of interest disclosure forms and management in critical care clinical practice guidelines
verfasst von
Waleed Alhazzani
Kimberley Lewis
Roman Jaeschke
Bram Rochwerg
Morten Hylander Møller
Laura Evans
Kevin C. Wilson
Sheena Patel
Craig M. Coopersmith
Maurizio Cecconi
Gordon Guyatt
Elie A. Akl
Publikationsdatum
27.09.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5367-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Intensive Care Medicine 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.