Erschienen in:
01.10.2011 | Knee
Classification of trochlear dysplasia as predictor of clinical outcome after trochleoplasty
verfasst von:
Sandro F. Fucentese, Patrick O. Zingg, Jürgen Schmitt, Christian W. A. Pfirrmann, Dominik C. Meyer, Peter P. Koch
Erschienen in:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
|
Ausgabe 10/2011
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
Sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty restores the trochlear groove in patients with patellofemoral instability and underlying trochlear dysplasia. There are types of dysplasia both with (B and D) and without (A and C) a supratrochlear spur. The aim of this study was to identify influencing factors for the clinical outcome following trochleoplasty.
Methods
Forty-four knees in 38 patients who underwent trochleoplasty for instability (type A in 9, B in 15, C in 9 and D in 11 knees) were assessed clinically with the Kujala score and radiologically with radiographs and MRI. The median follow-up was 4 (2–7.8) years.
Results
At follow-up, the median Kujala score had improved from 68 (29–84) to 90 (42–100) points (P < 0.001). Instability (P < 0.001) and pain (P = 0.027) decreased significantly, but in 3 knees, pain was worse postoperatively. Twenty-seven knees were ranked as excellent, 10 as good, 2 as fair and 5 as poor. Overall, dysplasia types B and D benefited more from surgery than types A and C. The postoperative MRI revealed no chondrolysis or subchondral necrosis, but deterioration of cartilage on the lateral trochlear facet was identified.
Conclusion
Trochleoplasty is a useful and reliable surgical technique to improve patellofemoral instability in patients with a dysplastic trochlea. While improved stability is predictable, pain is less predictable and may even increase following surgery. The overall results were directly dependent on the type of the dysplasia, with a significantly better clinical outcome in type B and D. The clinical relevance of this study is that severe dysplasia can successfully be treated with trochleoplasty.