Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2013

01.03.2013 | Knee

Revision total knee arthroplasty with varus–valgus constrained prosthesis versus posterior stabilized prosthesis

verfasst von: Joon Kyu Lee, Sahnghoon Lee, Dongwook Kim, Sang Min Lee, Jak Jang, Sang Cheol Seong, Myung Chul Lee

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aims of this retrospective study were to provide the basis for the choice of prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to evaluate the outcome with varus–valgus constrained prosthesis compared with posterior stabilized (PS) prosthesis.

Methods

One hundred and five patients (121 knees) received revision TKA; of which thirty-seven patients (42 knees) received PS prosthesis and sixty-eight patients (79 knees) received varus–valgus constrained prosthesis. The mean follow-up duration was 64.8 ± 31.5 months and 63.2 ± 28.1 months in the PS and varus–valgus constrained groups, respectively. The criterion of prosthesis choice was a subjective laxity assessed by the surgeon intraoperatively. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the preoperative factors in the choice of the prosthesis.

Results

The grade of femoral bone defect was the only factor that affected the choice of prosthesis. Clinical results improved significantly in both groups after surgery. There were no significant differences in clinical results between the two groups. Complication rates were 9.5 % in the PS group and 10.1 % in the varus–valgus constrained group, and the Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis revealed 8-year component survival rates of 83.1 and 93.0 % in the PS and varus–valgus constrained groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Femoral bone defect is an important factor to be considered in the choice of prosthesis for revision TKA. The varus–valgus constrained prosthesis showed an outcome similar to that of the PS prosthesis. For clinical relevance, varus–valgus constrained prosthesis is recommended in revision TKA when the PS prosthesis seems unsuitable for the management of instability.

Level of evidence

III.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooks PJ, Walker PS, Scott RD (1984) Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:302–308PubMed Brooks PJ, Walker PS, Scott RD (1984) Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:302–308PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson WF 3rd, Sculco TP, Insall JN, Ranawat CS (1988) Total condylar III knee prosthesis. Long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:21–28PubMed Donaldson WF 3rd, Sculco TP, Insall JN, Ranawat CS (1988) Total condylar III knee prosthesis. Long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:21–28PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48:167–175PubMed Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48:167–175PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh GA, Parks NL (1997) The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 46:227–236PubMed Engh GA, Parks NL (1997) The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 46:227–236PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Figgie HE 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS 3rd, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 68:1035–1040 Figgie HE 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS 3rd, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 68:1035–1040
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gofton WT, Tsigaras H, Butler RA, Patterson JJ, Barrack RL, Rorabeck CH (2002) Revision total knee arthroplasty: fixation with modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:158–168PubMedCrossRef Gofton WT, Tsigaras H, Butler RA, Patterson JJ, Barrack RL, Rorabeck CH (2002) Revision total knee arthroplasty: fixation with modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:158–168PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Figgie HE 3rd, Sobel M (1988) The results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:86–92PubMed Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Figgie HE 3rd, Sobel M (1988) The results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:86–92PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg VM, Kraay M (2004) The outcome of the cementless tibial component: a minimum 14-year clinical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:214–220PubMedCrossRef Goldberg VM, Kraay M (2004) The outcome of the cementless tibial component: a minimum 14-year clinical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:214–220PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas BD, Dennis, D.A. (2003) Implant selection in revision total knee arthroplasty. In: John J, Callaghan AGR, Harry E, Rubash (eds) The adult knee, vol 2. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1447–1453 Haas BD, Dennis, D.A. (2003) Implant selection in revision total knee arthroplasty. In: John J, Callaghan AGR, Harry E, Rubash (eds) The adult knee, vol 2. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1447–1453
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery W 3rd, Windsor RE (1995) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1700–1707 Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery W 3rd, Windsor RE (1995) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1700–1707
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartford JM, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Knoblick G (1998) Complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: an average 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplast 13:380–387CrossRef Hartford JM, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Knoblick G (1998) Complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: an average 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplast 13:380–387CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Insall JN, Dethmers DA (1982) Revision of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:123–130PubMed Insall JN, Dethmers DA (1982) Revision of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:123–130PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones EC, Insall JN, Inglis AE, Ranawat CS (1979) GUEPAR knee arthroplasty results and late complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 140:145–152PubMed Jones EC, Insall JN, Inglis AE, Ranawat CS (1979) GUEPAR knee arthroplasty results and late complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 140:145–152PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Karpinski MR, Grimer RJ (1987) Hinged knee replacement in revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 220:185–191PubMed Karpinski MR, Grimer RJ (1987) Hinged knee replacement in revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 220:185–191PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kavolus CH, Faris PM, Ritter MA, Keating EM (1991) The total condylar III knee prosthesis in elderly patients. J Arthroplast 6:39–43CrossRef Kavolus CH, Faris PM, Ritter MA, Keating EM (1991) The total condylar III knee prosthesis in elderly patients. J Arthroplast 6:39–43CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YH, Kim JS (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:1440–1447CrossRef Kim YH, Kim JS (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:1440–1447CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2006) Ten-year survival and clinical results of constrained components in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21:803–808CrossRef Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2006) Ten-year survival and clinical results of constrained components in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21:803–808CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters CL, Hennessey R, Barden RM, Galante JO, Rosenberg AG (1997) Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 12:896–903CrossRef Peters CL, Hennessey R, Barden RM, Galante JO, Rosenberg AG (1997) Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 12:896–903CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rand JA (1999) Planning for revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 48:161–166PubMed Rand JA (1999) Planning for revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 48:161–166PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg AG, Verner JJ, Galante JO (1991) Clinical results of total knee revision using the total condylar III prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:83–90PubMed Rosenberg AG, Verner JJ, Galante JO (1991) Clinical results of total knee revision using the total condylar III prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:83–90PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeda M, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Matsuda Y, Sato J (2011) Changes in varus-valgus laxity after total knee arthroplasty over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1783-7 Takeda M, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Matsuda Y, Sato J (2011) Changes in varus-valgus laxity after total knee arthroplasty over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-011-1783-7
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Thornhill TS, Dalziel RW, Sledge CB (1982) Alternatives to arthrodesis for the failed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:131–140PubMed Thornhill TS, Dalziel RW, Sledge CB (1982) Alternatives to arthrodesis for the failed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:131–140PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tigani D, Sabbioni G, Ben Ayad R, Filanti M, Rani N, Del Piccolo N (2010) Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1304–1310PubMedCrossRef Tigani D, Sabbioni G, Ben Ayad R, Filanti M, Rani N, Del Piccolo N (2010) Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1304–1310PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Boom LG, Brouwer RW, van den Akker-Scheek I, Bulstra SK, van Raaij JJ (2009) Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:119PubMedCrossRef van den Boom LG, Brouwer RW, van den Akker-Scheek I, Bulstra SK, van Raaij JJ (2009) Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:119PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363PubMed Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Vince KG, Long W (1995) Revision knee arthroplasty. The limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317:172–177PubMed Vince KG, Long W (1995) Revision knee arthroplasty. The limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317:172–177PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Revision total knee arthroplasty with varus–valgus constrained prosthesis versus posterior stabilized prosthesis
verfasst von
Joon Kyu Lee
Sahnghoon Lee
Dongwook Kim
Sang Min Lee
Jak Jang
Sang Cheol Seong
Myung Chul Lee
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1998-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.