Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2015

01.08.2015 | Ankle

Validation of the Dutch language version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score

verfasst von: I. N. Sierevelt, L. Beimers, C. J. A. van Bergen, D. Haverkamp, C. B. Terwee, G. M. M. J. Kerkhoffs

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 8/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to develop a Dutch language version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS-DLV) and evaluate its measurement properties according to the definitions of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN).

Methods

After a standard forward–backward translation procedure, the Dutch version of the FAOS was evaluated for reliability and validity in 110 patients with various hind foot and ankle complaints. Reliability was evaluated by calculation of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency, and the smallest detectable change (SDC). Construct validity of the FAOS was assessed by calculation of Spearman’s correlation coefficients with similar and dissimilar domains of the SF-36 health survey, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle and Hindfoot Scale, and visual analogue scales for pain and disability. Dimensionality was tested with confirmatory factor analysis.

Results

Reliability of the FAOS-DLV was good. The ICC of the subscales ranged from 0.83 to 0.88. The minimal value of Cronbach’s alpha was 0.76. The SDC at individual level ranged from 18 to 21 and at group level between 2.1 and 2.5. Construct validity was supported by confirmation of 85 % of the hypothesized correlations. Unidimensionality of the FAOS-DLV domains was moderate.

Conclusion

The Dutch version of the FAOS seems to have acceptable measurement properties. The questionnaire can be used for functional assessment of patients with varying hindfoot and ankle symptoms. It is, however, more suitable for clinical evaluation at group level than for monitoring a specific patient.

Level of evidence

Diagnostic study, Level I.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R, Sprangers MA, Te Velde A, Verrips E (1998) Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1055–1068PubMedCrossRef Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R, Sprangers MA, Te Velde A, Verrips E (1998) Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1055–1068PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Button G, Pinney S (2004) A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int 25:521–525PubMed Button G, Pinney S (2004) A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int 25:521–525PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L, Lyman S, Do H, Karlsson J, Adam SP, Young E, Deland JT, Ellis SJ (2012) Validation of Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 33:1145–1155PubMedCrossRef Chen L, Lyman S, Do H, Karlsson J, Adam SP, Young E, Deland JT, Ellis SJ (2012) Validation of Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 33:1145–1155PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRef Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat De Boer MR, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Moll AC, Völker-Dieben HJM, van Rens GHMB (2005) Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:1260–1268PubMedCrossRef De Boer MR, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Moll AC, Völker-Dieben HJM, van Rens GHMB (2005) Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:1260–1268PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat De Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, Verhaar JA, Terwee CB (2008) The Dutch version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score: a validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:16PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef De Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, Verhaar JA, Terwee CB (2008) The Dutch version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score: a validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:16PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat De Groot IB, Reijman M, Terwee CB, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Favejee M, Roos EM, Verhaar JAN (2007) Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Osteoarthr Cartil 15:104–109PubMedCrossRef De Groot IB, Reijman M, Terwee CB, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Favejee M, Roos EM, Verhaar JAN (2007) Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Osteoarthr Cartil 15:104–109PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006) When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 59:1033–1039PubMedCrossRef De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006) When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 59:1033–1039PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006) Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:54PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006) Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:54PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Eechaute C, Vaes P, Van Aerschot L, Asman S, Duquet W (2007) The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:6PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Eechaute C, Vaes P, Van Aerschot L, Asman S, Duquet W (2007) The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:6PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432PubMedCrossRef Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu L, Bentler P (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55CrossRef Hu L, Bentler P (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Karatepe AG, Günaydin R, Kaya T, Karlibaş U, Özbek G (2009) Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Rheumatol Int 30:169–173PubMedCrossRef Karatepe AG, Günaydin R, Kaya T, Karlibaş U, Özbek G (2009) Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Rheumatol Int 30:169–173PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353PubMedCrossRef Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mani SB, Brown HC, Nair P, Chen L, Do HT, Lyman S, Deland JT, Ellis SJ (2013) Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity. Foot Ankle Int 34:1140–1146PubMedCrossRef Mani SB, Brown HC, Nair P, Chen L, Do HT, Lyman S, Deland JT, Ellis SJ (2013) Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity. Foot Ankle Int 34:1140–1146PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RL, Irrgang JJ (2007) A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37:72–84PubMedCrossRef Martin RL, Irrgang JJ (2007) A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37:72–84PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Lalonde KA, Conti S (2006) Current concepts review: foot and ankle outcome instruments. Foot Ankle Int 27:383–390PubMed Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Lalonde KA, Conti S (2006) Current concepts review: foot and ankle outcome instruments. Foot Ankle Int 27:383–390PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19:539–549PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19:539–549PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2010) The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 63:737–745PubMedCrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2010) The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 63:737–745PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Negahban H, Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Sohani SM, Askari M, Fanian H, Parnianpour M (2010) Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran. Clin Rheumatol 29:479–486PubMedCrossRef Negahban H, Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Sohani SM, Askari M, Fanian H, Parnianpour M (2010) Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran. Clin Rheumatol 29:479–486PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J (2001) Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 22:788–794PubMed Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J (2001) Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 22:788–794PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS (1998) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:439–448PubMedCrossRef Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS (1998) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:439–448PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J (2006) Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a Review. J Educ Res 99:323–337CrossRef Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J (2006) Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a Review. J Educ Res 99:323–337CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Streiner DL, Norman GR (2008) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. In: 2nd (ed) Oxford University Press, New York Streiner DL, Norman GR (2008) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. In: 2nd (ed) Oxford University Press, New York
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42PubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2012) Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 21:651–657PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2012) Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 21:651–657PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Knol DL, De Boer MR, De Vet HCW (2009) Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1062–1067PubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Knol DL, De Boer MR, De Vet HCW (2009) Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1062–1067PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240PubMed Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Validation of the Dutch language version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score
verfasst von
I. N. Sierevelt
L. Beimers
C. J. A. van Bergen
D. Haverkamp
C. B. Terwee
G. M. M. J. Kerkhoffs
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3017-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2015

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.