Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2017

06.01.2016 | Knee

A cadaveric assessment of the risk of nerve injury during open subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a bicortical guidewire

verfasst von: Adnan Saithna, Alison Longo, R. W. Jordan, Jeff Leiter, Peter MacDonald, Jason Old

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the risk of neurological injury from the placement of a bicortical guidewire during subpectoral biceps tenodesis.

Methods

Ten forequarter cadaver specimens were evaluated. A bicortical guidewire was placed, and measurements to important local neurological structures were made with digital calipers at open dissection.

Results

The mean (range, SD) distances from the guidewire to the respective nerves was as follows: axillary nerve posteriorly, 15.7 mm (10–22 mm, 3.4); axillary nerve laterally, 18.7 mm (12–27 mm, 4.3); radial nerve posteriorly, 26.2 mm (16–35 mm, 7.0); radial nerve medially, 25 mm (16–33 mm, 4.4); and musculocutaneous nerve, 20.1 mm (12–26 mm, 5.2).

Conclusions

There has been some disagreement in the literature regarding the proximity of a bicortical guidewire to the axillary nerve posteriorly. The results of this study concur with reports from several other authors and demonstrate that this nerve is at risk of iatrogenic injury when using this technique. The clinical relevance of this work is to allow surgeons to better understand the proximity of the nerve to a bicortical guidewire and to highlight that this risk is avoided with a unicortical technique.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Arora AS, Singh A, Koonce RC (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of a unicortical button versus interference screw for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 29:638–644CrossRefPubMed Arora AS, Singh A, Koonce RC (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of a unicortical button versus interference screw for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 29:638–644CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchholz A, Martetschläger F, Siebenlist S, Sandmann GH, Hapfelmeier A, Lenich A, Millett PJ, Stöckle U, Elser F (2013) Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 29:845–853CrossRefPubMed Buchholz A, Martetschläger F, Siebenlist S, Sandmann GH, Hapfelmeier A, Lenich A, Millett PJ, Stöckle U, Elser F (2013) Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 29:845–853CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat DeAngelis JP, Chen A, Wexler M, Hertz B, Grimaldi Bournissaint L, Nazarian A, Ramappa AJ (2015) Biomechanical characterization of unicortical button fixation: a novel technique for proximal subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1434–1441CrossRefPubMed DeAngelis JP, Chen A, Wexler M, Hertz B, Grimaldi Bournissaint L, Nazarian A, Ramappa AJ (2015) Biomechanical characterization of unicortical button fixation: a novel technique for proximal subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1434–1441CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickens JF, Kilcoyne KG, Tintle SM, Giuliani J, Schaefer RA, Rue J-P (2012) Subpectoral biceps tenodesis: an anatomic study and evaluation of at-risk structures. Am J Sports Med 40:2337–2341CrossRefPubMed Dickens JF, Kilcoyne KG, Tintle SM, Giuliani J, Schaefer RA, Rue J-P (2012) Subpectoral biceps tenodesis: an anatomic study and evaluation of at-risk structures. Am J Sports Med 40:2337–2341CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ding DY, Gupta A, Snir N, Wolfson T, Meislin RJ (2014) Nerve proximity during bicortical drilling for subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 30:942–946CrossRefPubMed Ding DY, Gupta A, Snir N, Wolfson T, Meislin RJ (2014) Nerve proximity during bicortical drilling for subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 30:942–946CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Golish SR, Caldwell PE III, Miller MD, Singanamala N, Ranawat AS, Treme G, Pearson SE, Costic R, Sekiya JK (2008) Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 24:1103–1108CrossRefPubMed Golish SR, Caldwell PE III, Miller MD, Singanamala N, Ranawat AS, Treme G, Pearson SE, Costic R, Sekiya JK (2008) Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 24:1103–1108CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lancaster S, Smith G, Ogunleye O, Packham I (2014) Proximity of the axillary nerve during bicortical drilling for biceps tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3214-z PubMed Lancaster S, Smith G, Ogunleye O, Packham I (2014) Proximity of the axillary nerve during bicortical drilling for biceps tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-014-3214-z PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Millett PJ, Sanders B, Gobezie R, Braun S, Warner JJP (2008) Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Millett PJ, Sanders B, Gobezie R, Braun S, Warner JJP (2008) Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon SC, Cho NS, Rhee YG (2014) Analysis of “Hidden Lesions” of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: the subpectoral portion as the optimal tenodesis site. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546514554193 Moon SC, Cho NS, Rhee YG (2014) Analysis of “Hidden Lesions” of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: the subpectoral portion as the optimal tenodesis site. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.​1177/​0363546514554193​
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhee PC, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2013) Iatrogenic brachial plexus injuries associated with open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a report of 4 cases. Am J Sports Med 41:2048–2053CrossRefPubMed Rhee PC, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2013) Iatrogenic brachial plexus injuries associated with open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a report of 4 cases. Am J Sports Med 41:2048–2053CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanders B, Lavery KP, Pennington S, Warner JJP (2012) Clinical success of biceps tenodesis with and without release of the transverse humeral ligament. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:66–71CrossRefPubMed Sanders B, Lavery KP, Pennington S, Warner JJP (2012) Clinical success of biceps tenodesis with and without release of the transverse humeral ligament. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:66–71CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sethi PM, Rajaram A, Beitzel K, Hackett TR, Chowaniec DM, Mazzocca AD (2013) Biomechanical performance of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of interference screw fixation, cortical button fixation, and interference screw diameter. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:451–457CrossRefPubMed Sethi PM, Rajaram A, Beitzel K, Hackett TR, Chowaniec DM, Mazzocca AD (2013) Biomechanical performance of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of interference screw fixation, cortical button fixation, and interference screw diameter. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:451–457CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sethi PM, Vadasdi K, Greene RT, Vitale MA, Duong M, Miller SR (2015) Safety of open suprapectoral and subpectoral biceps tenodesis: an anatomic assessment of risk for neurologic injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:138–142CrossRefPubMed Sethi PM, Vadasdi K, Greene RT, Vitale MA, Duong M, Miller SR (2015) Safety of open suprapectoral and subpectoral biceps tenodesis: an anatomic assessment of risk for neurologic injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:138–142CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A cadaveric assessment of the risk of nerve injury during open subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a bicortical guidewire
verfasst von
Adnan Saithna
Alison Longo
R. W. Jordan
Jeff Leiter
Peter MacDonald
Jason Old
Publikationsdatum
06.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3972-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.