Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2017

05.10.2016 | Knee

Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the component size as used peroperative

verfasst von: Martijn G. M. Schotanus, Daphne A. L. Schoenmakers, Rob Sollie, Nanne P. Kort

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Patients-specific instruments (PSI) for implantation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be used to predict the implant size for both the femur and the tibia component. This study aims to determine the impact of approval of the PSI planning for TKA on the frequency of, and reason for intraoperative changes of implant sizes.

Methods

The clinical records of 293 patients operated with MRI- (90.4 %) and CT-based (9.6 %) PSI were reviewed for actual used implant size. Preoperative default planning from the technician and approved planning by the operating surgeon were compared with the intraoperative implanted component size for both the femur and tibia. Intraoperative reason for not following the default sizes was outdated. Furthermore, MRI- and CT-based PSI were compared for these outcomes.

Results

In 93.9 and 91.1 % for, respectively, the femur and tibia (n.s.), the surgeon planned size was implanted during surgery. The predicted size of the femur (p < 0.00) and the tibia (p < 0.00) component planned by a technician differed from the implanted component sizes in 62 (21.2 %) and 51 (17.4 %) patients, respectively. In 17 cases, the femoral component size was adapted intraoperative based on the expert opinion of the operating surgeon. In 26 cases, the tibia component was changed during the surgery because of a mediolateral overhang, sclerotic bone, medial or lateral release, limited extension and/or fixed varus deformity. The results between the MRI- and CT-based PSI did not differ (n.s.).

Conclusions

PSI is a tool to help the surgeon to achieve the best possible results during TKA. The planning made by a technician should always be validated and approved by the operating surgeon who has the ultimate responsibility regarding the operation. With PSI, the operating surgeon is able to minimize intraoperative implant size errors in advance to improve operating room efficiency with possible lowering hospital costs per procedure.

Levels of evidence

III.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Williams BM et al (2012) Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg 94(Suppl A):95–99CrossRef Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Williams BM et al (2012) Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg 94(Suppl A):95–99CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kort NP (2012) Preliminary experience with the patient-specific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83(4):387–393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kort NP (2012) Preliminary experience with the patient-specific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83(4):387–393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B et al (2013) Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2206–2212CrossRefPubMed Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B et al (2013) Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2206–2212CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Boonen B, Schrander DE, Schotanus MGM et al (2015) Patient Specific Guides in total Knee Arthroplasty: A two year Follow up of the first two hundred consecutive cases performed By a single Surgeon. JCRMM (1):1–10 Boonen B, Schrander DE, Schotanus MGM et al (2015) Patient Specific Guides in total Knee Arthroplasty: A two year Follow up of the first two hundred consecutive cases performed By a single Surgeon. JCRMM (1):1–10
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Del Gaizo D, Soileau ES, Lachiewicz PF (2009) Value of preoperative templating for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 22(4):284–293CrossRefPubMed Del Gaizo D, Soileau ES, Lachiewicz PF (2009) Value of preoperative templating for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 22(4):284–293CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Saxena A (2013) Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 28(8 Suppl):96–100CrossRefPubMed Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Saxena A (2013) Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 28(8 Suppl):96–100CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu AR, Kim JD, Bhatia S, Levine BR (2012) Effect of training level on accuracy of digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 35(2):e179–e183PubMed Hsu AR, Kim JD, Bhatia S, Levine BR (2012) Effect of training level on accuracy of digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 35(2):e179–e183PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Issa K, Rifai A, McGrath MS et al (2013) Reliability of templating with patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 26:429–434CrossRefPubMed Issa K, Rifai A, McGrath MS et al (2013) Reliability of templating with patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 26:429–434CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kniesel B, Konstantinidis L, Hirschmüller A et al (2014) Digital templating in total knee and hip replacement: an analysis of planning accuracy. Int Orthop 38(4):733–739CrossRefPubMed Kniesel B, Konstantinidis L, Hirschmüller A et al (2014) Digital templating in total knee and hip replacement: an analysis of planning accuracy. Int Orthop 38(4):733–739CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine B, Fabi D, Deirmengian C (2010) Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 33(11):797PubMed Levine B, Fabi D, Deirmengian C (2010) Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 33(11):797PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorio R, Siegel J, Specht LM et al (2009) A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe? J Arthroplasty 24(2):175–179CrossRef Lorio R, Siegel J, Specht LM et al (2009) A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe? J Arthroplasty 24(2):175–179CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller AG, Purtill JJ (2012) Accuracy of digital templating in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 41(11):510–512 Miller AG, Purtill JJ (2012) Accuracy of digital templating in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 41(11):510–512
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL et al (2012) Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Orthop Relat Res 470(3):889–894CrossRef Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL et al (2012) Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Orthop Relat Res 470(3):889–894CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietsch M, Djahani O, Hochegger M et al (2013) Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty: the importance of planning by the surgeon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2220–2226CrossRefPubMed Pietsch M, Djahani O, Hochegger M et al (2013) Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty: the importance of planning by the surgeon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(10):2220–2226CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin LE, Murgo KT (2013) Brief report: total knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific, pre-operative CT-guided navigation. R I Med J 96(3):34–37 Rubin LE, Murgo KT (2013) Brief report: total knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific, pre-operative CT-guided navigation. R I Med J 96(3):34–37
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sassoon A, Nam D, Nunley R, Barrack R (2015) Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:151–158CrossRefPubMed Sassoon A, Nam D, Nunley R, Barrack R (2015) Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:151–158CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schotanus MGM, Sollie R, van Haaren EH et al (2016) Radiological discrepancy between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides for total knee arthroplasty from the same manufacturer: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 98-B(6):786–792CrossRefPubMed Schotanus MGM, Sollie R, van Haaren EH et al (2016) Radiological discrepancy between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides for total knee arthroplasty from the same manufacturer: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 98-B(6):786–792CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Specht LM, Levitz S, Iorio R et al (2007) A comparison of acetate and digital templating for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:179–183PubMed Specht LM, Levitz S, Iorio R et al (2007) A comparison of acetate and digital templating for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:179–183PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson J, Peters CL (2013) Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(1):169–174CrossRefPubMed Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson J, Peters CL (2013) Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(1):169–174CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Fennema P (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-specific instrumentation for improving alignment of the components in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 96-B(8):1052–1061CrossRefPubMed Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Fennema P (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-specific instrumentation for improving alignment of the components in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 96-B(8):1052–1061CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat White D, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB (2008) Accuracy of MRI vs CT imaging with particular reference to patient specific templates for total knee replacement surgery. Int J Med Robot 4(3):224–231CrossRefPubMed White D, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB (2008) Accuracy of MRI vs CT imaging with particular reference to patient specific templates for total knee replacement surgery. Int J Med Robot 4(3):224–231CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Winder J, Bibb R (2005) Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1006–1015CrossRefPubMed Winder J, Bibb R (2005) Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1006–1015CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the component size as used peroperative
verfasst von
Martijn G. M. Schotanus
Daphne A. L. Schoenmakers
Rob Sollie
Nanne P. Kort
Publikationsdatum
05.10.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4345-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.