Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2003

01.12.2003 | Editorial

The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: does the evidence support our surgical practice?

verfasst von: Mark D. Walters

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2003

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The last 50 years of female urology and reconstructive pelvic surgery have seen many great ideas but few real innovations that have survived the test of time. The Marshall–Marchetti–Krantz procedure, fascial slings, bulking agents and tension-free slings are some examples of surgical innovations that have improved the care of affected patients. Other ideas – bone anchors come to mind – will probably not provide the results their inventors had hoped. Many surgeons like to try new techniques, and under certain circumstances they should be encouraged to do so. However, we need to step back occasionally and examine the evidence of what we do; without periodic reassessment, we risk losing our way by using techniques that really may not be beneficial to our patients. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1418–1422PubMed Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1418–1422PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ward K, Hilton P (2002) Prospective multicentre randomized trail of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. Br Med J 325:1–7 Ward K, Hilton P (2002) Prospective multicentre randomized trail of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. Br Med J 325:1–7
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Paraiso MFR, Ballard LA, Walters MD, Lee JC, Mitchinson AR (1996) Pelvic support defects and visceral and sexual function in women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1423–1431PubMed Paraiso MFR, Ballard LA, Walters MD, Lee JC, Mitchinson AR (1996) Pelvic support defects and visceral and sexual function in women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1423–1431PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC (1998) An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1451–1457PubMed Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC (1998) An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1451–1457PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: does the evidence support our surgical practice?
verfasst von
Mark D. Walters
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2003
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2003
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1113-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2003

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2003 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.