Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 3/2007

01.03.2007 | Original Article

Perioperative complications in abdominal sacrocolpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures

verfasst von: Fuat Demirci, Ismail Ozdemir, Asli Somunkiran, Samet Topuz, Cem Iyibozkurt, Gonul Duras Doyran, Ozlem Kemik Gul, Barıs Gul

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 3/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study assessed perioperative complications in abdominal sacrocolpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures. Perioperative complications were defined as any complication occurring during surgery or the first 6 weeks postoperatively. Forty-five patients underwent abdominal procedures (20 sacrohysteropexy and 25 sacrocolpopexy) and 60 patients underwent vaginal sacrospinous fixation. Of the 105 patients, 13 had vaginal vault prolapse. In the abdominal group, one bladder injury, four hemorrhages, and three wound dehiscences occurred. In the vaginal group, one rectal injury and one postoperative vaginal vault infection occurred. Major and minor complications were more frequent in the abdominal group than in the vaginal group. Blood loss was not significantly different. The operating time and hospital stay in the abdominal group were significantly longer than in the vaginal group. In conclusion, abdominal sacrocolpopexy had a higher rate of perioperative complications and longer hospital stay and operating time.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nichols DH (1982) Sacrospinous fixation for massive eversion of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:901–904PubMed Nichols DH (1982) Sacrospinous fixation for massive eversion of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:901–904PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shull BL, Capen CV, Riggs MW, Kuehl TJ (1992) Preoperative and postoperative analysis of site-specific pelvic support defects in 81 women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1764–1771PubMed Shull BL, Capen CV, Riggs MW, Kuehl TJ (1992) Preoperative and postoperative analysis of site-specific pelvic support defects in 81 women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1764–1771PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Randall CL, Nichols DH (1971) Surgical treatment of vaginal inversion. Obstet Gynecol 38:327–332PubMed Randall CL, Nichols DH (1971) Surgical treatment of vaginal inversion. Obstet Gynecol 38:327–332PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cruikshank SH (1991) Sacrospinous fixation-should this be performed at the time of vaginal hysterectomy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:1072–1076PubMed Cruikshank SH (1991) Sacrospinous fixation-should this be performed at the time of vaginal hysterectomy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:1072–1076PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Porges RF, Smilen SW (1994) Long-term analysis of the surgical management of pelvic support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1518–1528PubMed Porges RF, Smilen SW (1994) Long-term analysis of the surgical management of pelvic support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1518–1528PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Yucel O, Alhan A (2003) A new, simple, safe, effective and cost effective procedure for genuine stress incontinence: midurethral polypropylene sling. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 43:58–60PubMedCrossRef Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Yucel O, Alhan A (2003) A new, simple, safe, effective and cost effective procedure for genuine stress incontinence: midurethral polypropylene sling. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 43:58–60PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Alhan A (2005) The midurethral polypropylene sling for stress incontinence: 22-month results of 81 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 272:145–150PubMedCrossRef Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Alhan A (2005) The midurethral polypropylene sling for stress incontinence: 22-month results of 81 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 272:145–150PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823PubMed Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat David-Montefiore E, Garbin O, Hummel M, Nisand I (2004) Sacro-spinous ligament fixation peri-operative complications in 195 cases: visual approach versus digital approach of the sacro-spinous ligament. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 116:71–78PubMedCrossRef David-Montefiore E, Garbin O, Hummel M, Nisand I (2004) Sacro-spinous ligament fixation peri-operative complications in 195 cases: visual approach versus digital approach of the sacro-spinous ligament. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 116:71–78PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1418–1422PubMedCrossRef Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1418–1422PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo TS, Wang AC (1998) Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison. J Gynecol Surg 14:59–64 Lo TS, Wang AC (1998) Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison. J Gynecol Surg 14:59–64
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schuleter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26PubMedCrossRef Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schuleter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S (2004) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S (2004) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Perioperative complications in abdominal sacrocolpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures
verfasst von
Fuat Demirci
Ismail Ozdemir
Asli Somunkiran
Samet Topuz
Cem Iyibozkurt
Gonul Duras Doyran
Ozlem Kemik Gul
Barıs Gul
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0134-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2007

International Urogynecology Journal 3/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.