Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2009

Open Access 01.10.2009 | Original Article

Symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction are poorly correlated with findings on clinical examination and dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor

verfasst von: Suzan R. Broekhuis, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Jan C. M. Hendriks, Jelle O. Barentsz, Mark E. Vierhout, Kirsten B. Kluivers

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 10/2009

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of the study was to determine whether patients’ symptoms agree with findings on clinical examination and dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor.

Methods

Symptoms of pelvic organ dysfunction were measured with the use of three validated questionnaires. The domain scores were compared with POP-Q and dynamic MR imaging measurements. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r s) was used to assess agreement.

Results

Only the domain score genital prolapse was significantly correlated in the positive direction with the degree of pelvic organ prolapse as assessed by POP-Q and dynamic MR imaging (r s = 0.64 and 0.27, respectively), whereas the domain score urinary incontinence was inversely correlated (r s = −0.32 and −0.35, respectively).

Conclusions

The sensation or visualization of a bulge in the vagina was the only symptom which correlated positively with the degree of pelvic organ prolapse, and clinical examination and dynamic MR imaging showed similar correlation in this respect.

Introduction

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and symptoms of pelvic organ dysfunction are both common in the general population and may occur concurrently, but independently. Therefore, a good understanding of the interrelation is of utmost importance and aids in the (preoperative) counseling of patients. The correlation between patients’ symptoms and clinical staging of POP is known to be poor. Previous studies have, for example, shown little or no agreement between POP severity and symptoms of bladder and bowel dysfunction [17]. The only symptom which has previously shown to be well correlated with the severity of prolapse was “to see or to feel a bulge in the vagina” [1, 5, 812]. Furthermore, in a study on the comparison of POP-Q and ultrasound staging of prolapse, the two methods performed similar with regards to the identification of women with the sensation or visualization of a lump in the vagina [13]. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor is another potentially useful diagnostic tool in the preoperative assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction [14]. Until now, however, there are no studies available, which have assessed the agreement between measurements on dynamic MR imaging and patients’ symptoms. The aim of the present study was to determine whether patients’ symptoms assessed with validated questionnaires agree with staging of POP on POP-Q and dynamic MR imaging.

Materials and methods

This observational study was performed at the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, the Netherlands, from September 2005 through January 2008. The center is a national tertiary referral center for women with pelvic organ dysfunctions. Inclusion criteria were consecutive women with pelvic organ dysfunction, i.e., pelvic organ prolapse, urinary or defecatory disorders, who underwent dynamic MR imaging in the inclusion period. MR imaging was performed as part of routine clinical practice in patients with recurrent prolapse, especially in the posterior compartment, and in case the patient’s complaints did not correspond with clinical findings.
The study was submitted to and deemed exempt by the local institutional review board.

Symptom assessment

Patients’ symptoms were measured with the use of the disease specific quality of life questionnaires urogenital distress inventory (UDI), defecatory distress inventory (DDI), and the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ). The questionnaires have previously been validated for the Dutch language [15, 16]. The UDI consist of 11 items and five domains on bothersome urinary complaints. The DDI measures bothersome defecatory complaints and consists of 11 items and five domains. The IIQ consists of 13 items and measures the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life in five domains. The score on each domain of these questionnaires ranges from 0 till 100, where 0 indicates the best quality of life and 100 indicates the poorest quality of life.

Clinical examination

Clinical assessment of POP was performed with the use of POP-Q by one out of three gynecologists experienced in the assessment of POP. In the POP-Q, nine measurement points are assessed during maximal Valsalva maneuver and in the supine lithotomy position (except the transvaginal length, which is measured at rest). Only the measurements of POP-Q points Ba, C, and Bp were used in this study. Ba is the most descended edge of the anterior vaginal wall in centimeters relative to the hymenal remnants, and C represents either the most distal edge of the cervix or the leading edge of the vaginal vault after total hysterectomy, whereas Bp is the most descended edge of the posterior vagina wall.

Dynamic MR imaging protocol

The dynamic MR imaging examination was performed with the patient in the supine position with parallel and slightly flexed legs. Patients were requested not to void for 1–2 h prior to the examination. The rectum was opacified using 100–150 ml ultrasound gel. The urethra, bladder, and vagina were not opacified. No premedication was given. MR images were acquired using a 3T MR scanner (TIM TRIO, Siemens Medical, Germany) and an eight-channel body-phased array coil. MR images were obtained in the sagittal plane using a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence (2,000 ms/90 ms repetition time/echo time; 150° flip angle), with a temporal resolution of 1 s during 2 min. During the MR examination, the patient was asked to relax the pelvic floor muscles, to contract the muscles slowly, relax again, and then to increase the intraabdominal pressure and strain in order to defecate. To assure that the patient followed the instruction given, all images were viewed online on the MR console. A whirl of urine in the bladder and/or a dent into the cranial portion of the bladder, seen on the sagittal images, indicated adequate straining.
The images were analyzed at a later stage on a console with zoom facilities and electronic calipers. The observer was blinded to the patients’ symptoms and the clinical findings. The midsagittal images on maximal strain were used to assess the prolapse. The pubococcygeal line was defined as a straight line between the inferior rim of the pubic bone and the last visible coccygeal joint, the H-line as a straight line between the inferior rim of the pubic bone and the posterior wall of the anal canal on the level of the impression of the puborectal sling, and the mid-pubic line as a line drawn through the longitudinal axis of the pubic bone, passing through its midequatorial point [17].
On maximum strain, the leading edge of the bladder (anterior compartment), the cervix or vaginal vault (central compartment), and the most anteriocaudal point of the anterior rectal wall or the most distal portion of the peritoneal sack containing peritoneal fat or small bowel loops (posterior compartment) was determined in centimeters perpendicular to the three reference lines.

Statistical methods

The most descended POP-Q point and the most descended measurement on dynamic MR imaging (irrespective of the compartment) were used in the analysis. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between the different measurements, i.e., the domain scores on the questionnaires, the most descended POP-Q point, and the most descended MR imaging measurement. A Spearman’s correlation coefficient of more than 0.80 denotes excellent correlation, between 0.80 and 0.60 good correlation, between 0.60 and 0.40 moderate correlation, and below 0.40 poor correlation, respectively. SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc.,Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform the statistical analysis. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

One hundred and twenty women underwent dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor during the study period. Sixty-nine of these women had completed the questionnaires and were included in the analysis. Sixty-six of these sixty-nine women underwent POP-Q examination. Women’s baseline characteristics and clinical measurements are shown in Table 1. Ninety percent of the women had a previous history of one or more gynecological operations, i.e., a hysterectomy, POP surgery, or urinary incontinence surgery.
Table 1
Characteristics of the women included in the study (n = 69)
 
Values
Baseline characteristics
Age (years)
54 (31; 75)
BMI (kg/m2)
26 (20; 36)
Paritya
2 (1; 6)
Number of previous gynecological operationsa
 
 None
7 (10%)
 1 or 2 operations
22 (32%)
 ≥3 operations
40 (58%)
Types of gynecological surgerya
 
 POP surgery
34 (49%)
 Urinary incontinence surgery
16 (23%)
 Hysterectomy
39 (57%)
Clinical measurements
POP-Q (cm)
 
 Ba
−2 (−3; +4)
 C
−6 (−9; +3)
 Bp
0 (−3; +4)
 Most descended point
0 (−3; +4)
MRI, most descended (cm)
 
 PCL
0.4 (−1.2; 2.5)
 H-line
0.5 (−1.2; 2.6)
 MPL
0.6 (−1.6; 2.9)
UDI
 
 Overactive bladder
33.3 (0; 100.0)
 Urinary incontinence
16.7 (0; 100.0)
 Obstructive micturition
16.7 (0; 100.0)
 Discomfort/pain
33.3 (0; 100.0)
 Genital prolapse
33.3 (0; 100.0)
DDI
 
 Constipation
16.7 (0; 100.0)
 Obstructed defecation
16.7 (0; 83.3)
 Pain
0.0 (0; 100.0)
 Incontinence
16.7 (0; 100.0)
 Flatulence
33.3 (0; 100.0)
IIQ
 
 Physical functioning
33.3 (0; 100.0)
 Mobility
38.9 (0; 100.0)
 Social function
22.2 (0; 88.9)
 Embarrassment
16.7 (0; 100.0)
 Emotional health
33.3 (0; 100.0)
n number of patients, BMI body mass index, POP-Q pelvic organ prolapse (quantification), cm centimeters relative to the hymen, Ba most descended edge of the anterior vaginal wall on strain, C most descended edge of the cervix or vaginal vault on strain, Bp most descended edge of the posterior vagina wall on strain, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, PCL pubococcygeal line, MPL mid-pubic line, UDI urogenital distress inventory, DDI defecatory distress inventory, IIQ incontinence impact questionnaire
aData presented as median (range) or number of patients
Tables 2, 3, and 4 show the mutual correlations between domain scores (e.g., the UDI domain scores vs. the UDI domain scores, the DDI domain scores vs. the DDI domain scores, and the IIQ domain scores vs. the IIQ domain scores). The statistical significant results of these mutual correlations had a positive direction (r s range = 0.26; 0.59), with the exception of the correlation between the domain score “genital prolapse” with the domain score “urinary incontinence” (r s = −0.42). This negative correlation can be explained by the fact that more severe POP may result in a decrease of urinary incontinence symptoms due to more obstruction.
Table 2
The mutual correlation of the urogenital distress inventory domain scores
 
Overactive bladder
Urinary incontinence
Obstructive micturition
Discomfort/pain
Genital prolapse
n
r s
n
r s
n
r s
n
r s
n
r s
Overactive bladder
60
1.00
60
0.41a
60
0.45a
58
0.47a
57
0.06
Urinary incontinence
  
63
1.00
63
−0.06
61
0.28b
60
−0.42a
Obstructive micturition
    
65
1.00
63
0.26b
62
0.39a
Discomfort/pain
      
67
1.00
63
0.28b
Genital prolapse
        
65
1.00
n number of patients, r s Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
aCorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)
bCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed)
Table 3
The mutual correlation of the defecatory distress inventory domain scores
 
Constipation
Obstructed defecation
Pain
Incontinence
Flatulence
n
r s
n
r s
n
r s
n
r s
n
r s
Constipation
65
1.00
64
0.56a
64
0.55a
63
−0.15
63
−0.14
Obstructed defecation
  
65
1.00
63
0.51a
64
0.02
64
0.05
Pain
    
65
1.00
63
0.00
63
0.08
Incontinence
      
66
1.00
65
0.49a
Flatulence
        
66
1.00
n number of patients, r s Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
aCorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)
bCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed)
Table 4
The mutual correlation of the incontinence impact questionnaire domain scores
 
Physical functioning
Mobility
Social function
Embarrassment
Emotional health
n
r s
n
r s
n
r s
n
r s
n
r s
Physical functioning
65
1.00
64
0.35a
60
0.43a
62
0.00
65
0.24
Mobility
  
66
1.00
62
0.51a
63
0.46a
66
0.48a
Social function
    
62
1.00
59
0.39a
62
0.58a
Embarrassment
      
64
1.00
64
0.59a
Emotional health
        
67
1.00
n number of patients, r s Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
aCorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)
bCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed)
The statistical significant correlation between the most descended POP-Q point with the most descended measurement on dynamic MR imaging was r s = 0.39. The statistical significant correlations between the three reference lines, e.g., the most descended measurement in relation to the pubococcygeal line vs. the H-line, the pubococcygeal line vs. the mid-pubic line, and the H-line vs. the mid-pubic line were r s = 0.94, r s = 0.79, and r s = 0.83, respectively. For the ease of presentation, the results in Table 5 are shown in relation to the pubococcygeal line only. In view of the high correlations, however, the results apply to the two other reference lines as well.
Table 5
Spearman’s correlation between questionnaire domain scores and the most descended POP-Q point and the most descended measurement on dynamic MR imaging
POP-Q
MR imaginga
n
r s
n
r s
UDI
Overactive bladder
58
−0.06
60
−0.17
Urinary incontinence
61
−0.32b
63
−0.35c
Obstructive micturition
62
0.35c
67
0.07
Discomfort/pain
64
0.24
65
−0.01
Genital prolapse
62
0.64c
65
0.27b
DDI
Constipation
62
0.00
65
−0.03
Obstructed defecation
62
0.05
65
−0.05
Pain
62
−0.04
65
−0.08
Incontinence
63
−0.11
66
−0.25b
Flatulence
63
−0.02
66
−0.41c
IIQ
Physical functioning
62
0.36c
65
0.06
Mobility
63
−0.16
66
−0.27b
Social function
59
0.00
62
−0.15
Embarrassment
61
−0.25b
64
−0.47c
Emotional health
64
−0.18
67
−0.33c
POP-Q pelvic organ prolapse-quantification, MR magnetic resonance, n number of patients, r s Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, UDI urogenital distress inventory, DDI defecatory distress inventory, IIQ incontinence impact questionnaire
aMeasurements in relation to the pubococcygeal line
bStatistically significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed)
cStatistically significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed)
Table 5 shows the Spearman’s correlation between the domain scores of the questionnaire with the most descended POP-Q point and with the most descended measurement on dynamic MR imaging in relation to the pubococcygeal line, respectively. The correlations were mostly negative and only moderate to poor. The domain scores “obstructive micturition”, genital prolapse, and “physical functioning” correlated statistically significant with the most descended POP-Q point in the positive direction (r s = 0.35, 0.64, and 0.36, respectively), as did the domain score genital prolapse with the most descended MR imaging measurement (r s = 0.27). The strongest correlations were between the UDI domain score genital prolapse and the most descended POP-Q point (r s = 0.64) and between the DDI domain score “flatulence” and IIQ domain score “embarrassment” and the most descended MR imaging measurement (r s = −0.41 and −0.47).

Discussion

This observational study is, to our knowledge, the first report on the agreement between patients’ symptoms as assessed with validated questionnaires and findings on dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor. These results were offset against the agreement between patients’ symptoms and POP-Q findings. In view of the low correlations, dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor is not likely to have an additional value in the prediction of symptoms, and clinical examination can thus be regarded as the golden standard. As confirmed by previous studies, to see or to feel a bulge in the vagina was the only symptom that correlated well with the degree of POP [1, 5, 812].
Our findings are of utmost importance in the counseling of POP patients and the discussion on patient’s expectations. Patients with symptoms other than the sensation or visualization of a bulge in the vagina need to be informed that their symptoms might not be a direct result of the POP. Consequently, it is unclear to what degree these symptoms improve following surgical treatment.
More severe POP may result in a decrease of urinary incontinence symptoms due to more obstruction. Although there are some previous studies that support this theory [2, 5], others have reported that urinary incontinence symptoms were not associated with the degree of POP [1, 6, 9, 10]. In the present study, however, the relationship between more severe prolapse and urinary incontinence was reflected in the inversed correlations between more bother on the domain score urinary incontinence and genital prolapse, as well as the domain score urinary incontinence and more severe POP on MR imaging and clinical examination. Less incontinence at higher prolapse stages was also demonstrated in the inversed correlation between several domain scores of the IIQ with the degree of POP. As expected, these impact scores had a statistically significant positive correlation with the domain score urinary incontinence of the UDI.
The main question remains why the degree of POP correlates so poorly with various patients’ complaints, with the exception of the question on to see or to feel a bulge in the vagina. It might be partly due to the fact that POP and pelvic floor dysfunctions are both very common disorders. Our results suggest that bladder and bowel dysfunctions coexist without a causal relation to the degree of prolapse.
In the present, study we report on the agreement of symptoms with the most descended edge of prolapse. We did, however, analyze the data on the agreement between symptoms and the descent in each compartment separately. Overall, this resulted in even poorer correlations between pelvic floor dysfunctions and cystocele, uterine descent/vaginal vault prolapse, or rectocele separately. In other words, there are no specific symptoms related to the descent in the different compartments.
In dynamic MR imaging, various reference lines may be used to stage POP [17]. The preferable reference line is, however, a subject of ongoing debate [17, 18]. In the present study, there was a good to excellent mutual correlation between the MR imaging measurements in relation to the three different reference lines. This shows that the differences between the reference lines are only minor and either choice for a reference line seems correct. We choose to present the results for the pubococcygeal line since this is the most widely used reference line, and the measurements previously showed good reproducibility [18]. The results hold true, however, for the other reference lines as well.
The results of our study may have been influenced by the tertiary referral patient population, which consisted of 62 women (90%) who had at least one previous operation for POP or urinary incontinence. In this specific patient population, the evaluation of symptoms in relation to POP stages may be more complex, regardless of the modality used. Until now, it is unclear to what extent our results apply to other populations as well, such as to women without previous surgery.
In conclusion, to see or to feel a bulge in the vagina was the only symptom that correlated with the degree of POP. In comparison with clinical examination, dynamic MR imaging had no additional value in the prediction of symptoms with increasing degree of POP. However, the fast majority of the included women had previous one or more pelvic surgical procedure(s). The conclusions may therefore not be the same to naive patients.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Financial support

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​2.​0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Gynäkologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Gynäkologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der beiden Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten gynäkologischen oder urologischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

e.Med Urologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Urologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu den urologischen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der urologischen Fachzeitschriften.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley CS, Nygaard IE (2005) Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet Gynecol 106:759–766PubMed Bradley CS, Nygaard IE (2005) Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet Gynecol 106:759–766PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Walters MD, Weber AM (2004) Pelvic symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 104:982–988PubMed Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Walters MD, Weber AM (2004) Pelvic symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 104:982–988PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chou Q, Weber AM, Piedmonte MR (2000) Clinical presentation of enterocele. Obstet Gynecol 96:599–603PubMedCrossRef Chou Q, Weber AM, Piedmonte MR (2000) Clinical presentation of enterocele. Obstet Gynecol 96:599–603PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat da Silva GM, Gurland B, Sleemi A, Levy G (2006) Posterior vaginal wall prolapse does not correlate with fecal symptoms or objective measures of anorectal function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1742–1747PubMedCrossRef da Silva GM, Gurland B, Sleemi A, Levy G (2006) Posterior vaginal wall prolapse does not correlate with fecal symptoms or objective measures of anorectal function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1742–1747PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE (2001) Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1332–1337PubMedCrossRef Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE (2001) Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1332–1337PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mouritsen L, Larsen JP (2003) Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:122–127PubMedCrossRef Mouritsen L, Larsen JP (2003) Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:122–127PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber AM, Walters MD, Ballard LA, Booher DL, Piedmonte MR (1998) Posterior vaginal prolapse and bowel function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1446–1449PubMedCrossRef Weber AM, Walters MD, Ballard LA, Booher DL, Piedmonte MR (1998) Posterior vaginal prolapse and bowel function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1446–1449PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Neubauer NL, Klein-Olarte V (2006) Can we screen for pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in epidemiologic studies? Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:942–948PubMedCrossRef Barber MD, Neubauer NL, Klein-Olarte V (2006) Can we screen for pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in epidemiologic studies? Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:942–948PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V (2005) The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 112:971–976PubMedCrossRef Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V (2005) The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 112:971–976PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghetti C, Gregory WT, Edwards SR, Otto LN, Clark AL (2005) Pelvic organ descent and symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:53–57PubMedCrossRef Ghetti C, Gregory WT, Edwards SR, Otto LN, Clark AL (2005) Pelvic organ descent and symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:53–57PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J (2003) Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:372–377PubMedCrossRef Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J (2003) Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:372–377PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan JS, Lukacz ES, Menefee SA, Powell CR, Nager CW (2005) Predictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:203–209PubMedCrossRef Tan JS, Lukacz ES, Menefee SA, Powell CR, Nager CW (2005) Predictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:203–209PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Shek C, Dietz HP (2008) Pelvic organ prolapse symptoms in relation to POPQ, ordinal stages and ultrasound prolapse assessment. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1299–1302PubMedCrossRef Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Shek C, Dietz HP (2008) Pelvic organ prolapse symptoms in relation to POPQ, ordinal stages and ultrasound prolapse assessment. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1299–1302PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Law YM, Fielding JR (2008) MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:S45–S53PubMedCrossRef Law YM, Fielding JR (2008) MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:S45–S53PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de PG, Heintz AP, van d V (2006) Defecatory symptoms during and after the first pregnancy: prevalences and associated factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:224–230PubMedCrossRef van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de PG, Heintz AP, van d V (2006) Defecatory symptoms during and after the first pregnancy: prevalences and associated factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:224–230PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP (2003) Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn 22:97–104PubMedCrossRef van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP (2003) Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn 22:97–104PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Broekhuis SR, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB (2009) A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:721–729PubMedCrossRef Broekhuis SR, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB (2009) A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:721–729PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Broekhuis SR, Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Vierhout ME, Barentsz JO, Futterer JJ (2009) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:141–148PubMedCrossRef Broekhuis SR, Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Vierhout ME, Barentsz JO, Futterer JJ (2009) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: reliability of anatomical landmarks and reference lines used to assess pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:141–148PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction are poorly correlated with findings on clinical examination and dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor
verfasst von
Suzan R. Broekhuis
Jurgen J. Fütterer
Jan C. M. Hendriks
Jelle O. Barentsz
Mark E. Vierhout
Kirsten B. Kluivers
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0938-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2009

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.