Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2011

01.09.2011 | Clinical Opinion

Twenty years of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: where are we now?

verfasst von: Boris Gabriel, Joseph Nassif, Sonia Barata, Arnaud Wattiez

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 9/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) was first described almost 20 years ago. This technique aims to provide the outcomes of the gold standard abdominal approach while offering the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. However, the widespread diffusion of LSC in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is hampered by its presumed length and technical difficulties due to the inherent need for laparoscopic suturing skills.

Methods

In this article, we highlight the current status of LSC based on a historical overview and in the paradigm of an interrelationship between the three different approaches to POP correction.

Results

The enormous changes over the past 15 years have contributed to a better understanding of the pathologies and their treatment, which has enabled us to refine LSC, to simplify it, and to make it much more reproducible.

Conclusions

In the future, we will need more prospective studies to compare LSC with vaginal reconstructive surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Huguier J, Scali P (1958) Posterior suspension of the genital axis on the lumbosacral disc in the treatment of uterine prolapse. Presse Med 66:781–784PubMed Huguier J, Scali P (1958) Posterior suspension of the genital axis on the lumbosacral disc in the treatment of uterine prolapse. Presse Med 66:781–784PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S (20010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 14(4):CD004014 Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S (20010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 14(4):CD004014
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Burch JC (1961) Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 81:281–290PubMed Burch JC (1961) Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 81:281–290PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wattiez A, Boughizane S, Alexandre F, Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA (1995) Laparoscopic procedures for stress incontinence and prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 7:317–321PubMed Wattiez A, Boughizane S, Alexandre F, Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA (1995) Laparoscopic procedures for stress incontinence and prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 7:317–321PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pantazis K, Freeman R, Thomson A et al. (2008) Results from the LAS trial, an RCT comparing open abdominal to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Suppl 1, Abstract 120, p101 Pantazis K, Freeman R, Thomson A et al. (2008) Results from the LAS trial, an RCT comparing open abdominal to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Suppl 1, Abstract 120, p101
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G (2009) The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol 55:1089–1103PubMedCrossRef Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G (2009) The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol 55:1089–1103PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CF, Feiner B, de Cuyper E et al. (2009) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy vs. total vaginal mesh for the management of vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 20 Suppl 2, Abstract 089, p151 Maher CF, Feiner B, de Cuyper E et al. (2009) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy vs. total vaginal mesh for the management of vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 20 Suppl 2, Abstract 089, p151
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian D, Szwarcensztein K, Mauskopf JA, Slack MC (2009) Rate, type, and cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Germany, France, and England. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144(2):177–181PubMedCrossRef Subramanian D, Szwarcensztein K, Mauskopf JA, Slack MC (2009) Rate, type, and cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Germany, France, and England. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144(2):177–181PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Claerhout F, Roovers JP, Lewi P, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2009) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy—a single centre’s experience. Int Urogynecol J 20:1119–1125CrossRef Claerhout F, Roovers JP, Lewi P, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2009) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy—a single centre’s experience. Int Urogynecol J 20:1119–1125CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zacharin RF (1980) Pulsion enterocele: review of functional anatomy of the pelvic floor. Obstet Gynecol 55(2):135–140PubMed Zacharin RF (1980) Pulsion enterocele: review of functional anatomy of the pelvic floor. Obstet Gynecol 55(2):135–140PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J ObstetGynecol 166:1717–1724 DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J ObstetGynecol 166:1717–1724
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Petros PE, Ulmsten UI (1990) An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 153:7–31PubMed Petros PE, Ulmsten UI (1990) An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 153:7–31PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter K (1968) Die chirurgische Anatomie der Vaginaefixation sacrospinalis vaginalis. Ein Beitrag zur operativen Behandlung des Scheidenblindsackprolapses. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 28:321–327PubMed Richter K (1968) Die chirurgische Anatomie der Vaginaefixation sacrospinalis vaginalis. Ein Beitrag zur operativen Behandlung des Scheidenblindsackprolapses. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 28:321–327PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers RM Jr (2003) Anatomy of pelvic support. In: Bent AE, Ostergard DR, Cundiff GW, Swift SE (eds) Ostergard’s urogynecology and pelvic floor dysfunction. Lippincott, Philadephia, pp 19–33 Rogers RM Jr (2003) Anatomy of pelvic support. In: Bent AE, Ostergard DR, Cundiff GW, Swift SE (eds) Ostergard’s urogynecology and pelvic floor dysfunction. Lippincott, Philadephia, pp 19–33
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, Nygaard I et al (2006) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 354(15):1557–1566PubMedCrossRef Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, Nygaard I et al (2006) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 354(15):1557–1566PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter H, Visco A et al (2008) Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without Burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 112:49–55PubMedCrossRef Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter H, Visco A et al (2008) Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without Burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 112:49–55PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Del Zingaro M et al (2008) Burch colposuspension does not provide any additional benefit to pelvic organ prolapse repair in patients with urinary incontinence: a randomized surgical trial. J Urol 180(3):1007–1012PubMedCrossRef Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Del Zingaro M et al (2008) Burch colposuspension does not provide any additional benefit to pelvic organ prolapse repair in patients with urinary incontinence: a randomized surgical trial. J Urol 180(3):1007–1012PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat deTayrac R, Gervaise A, Chaubeaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H (2004) Combined genital prolapse repair with a polypropylene mesh and tension free vaginal tape in women with genital prolapse and stress-urinary incontinence: a retrospective case–control study with short-term follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(10):950–954CrossRef deTayrac R, Gervaise A, Chaubeaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H (2004) Combined genital prolapse repair with a polypropylene mesh and tension free vaginal tape in women with genital prolapse and stress-urinary incontinence: a retrospective case–control study with short-term follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(10):950–954CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Aungst MJ, Mamienski TD, Albright TS, Zahn CM et al (2009) Prophylactic Burch colposuspension at the time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a survey of current practive patterns. Int Urogynecol J 20(8):897–904CrossRef Aungst MJ, Mamienski TD, Albright TS, Zahn CM et al (2009) Prophylactic Burch colposuspension at the time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a survey of current practive patterns. Int Urogynecol J 20(8):897–904CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Steen A, van der Ploeg M, Dijkgraaf MG, van der Vaart H et al (2010) Protocol for the CUPIDO trials; multicenter randomized controlled trials to assess the value of combining prolapse surgery and incontinence surgery in patients with genital prolapse and evident stress incontinence (CUPIDO I) and patients with genital prolapse and occult stress incontinence (CUPIDO II). BMC Womens Health 10:16PubMedCrossRef van der Steen A, van der Ploeg M, Dijkgraaf MG, van der Vaart H et al (2010) Protocol for the CUPIDO trials; multicenter randomized controlled trials to assess the value of combining prolapse surgery and incontinence surgery in patients with genital prolapse and evident stress incontinence (CUPIDO I) and patients with genital prolapse and occult stress incontinence (CUPIDO II). BMC Womens Health 10:16PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Twenty years of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: where are we now?
verfasst von
Boris Gabriel
Joseph Nassif
Sonia Barata
Arnaud Wattiez
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 9/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1361-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2011

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.