Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2013

01.01.2013 | Original Article

A cross-sectional survey of the relationship between fecal incontinence and constipation

verfasst von: Eddie H. M. Sze, C. Debra Barker, Gerry Hobbs

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We compared the prevalence of fecal incontinence between constipated and nonconstipated women and correlated its prevalence with the number of Rome III constipation symptoms.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the prevalence of fecal incontinence and constipation among women who presented to two gynecologic clinics for routine care over a 24-month period. Fecal incontinence was defined as loss of well-formed and/or loose stool beyond the patient’s control that occurred at least once in the last 4 weeks, was bothersome, had been present for the past 3 or more months, and had affected the person’s activities, relationships, or feelings. Constipation was diagnosed using the Rome III criteria. Our study was exempt from institutional review board approval because it was a survey and did not ask for information that could be used to identify the participant.

Results

Mean age of the 2,319 participants was 50.1 ± 15 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 ± 7. Seven hundred and twenty-five (31 %) women had constipation, and 233 (10 %) had fecal incontinence. One hundred and one (43 %) incontinent women had coexisting constipation. Logistic regression analysis identified white race (p = .013), menopause (p = .010), and constipation (p = .004) as risk factors for fecal incontinence. After controlling for these risk factors, constipated women were more likely to have fecal incontinence than nonconstipated women [relative risk (RR) 1.60, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.26–2.05]. In addition, the prevalence of fecal incontinence was strongly associated with the number of Rome III constipation symptoms (p < .001).

Conclusion

Constipation is an important risk factor for fecal incontinence.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitehead WE, Norton NJ, Wald A (2004) Advancing the treatment of fecal and urinary incontinence through research. Gastroenterology 126(Suppl 1):S1–S2PubMedCrossRef Whitehead WE, Norton NJ, Wald A (2004) Advancing the treatment of fecal and urinary incontinence through research. Gastroenterology 126(Suppl 1):S1–S2PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Karoui S, Leroi AM, Koning E, Menard JF, Michot F, Denis P (2000) Results of sphincteroplasty in 86 patients with anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:813–20PubMedCrossRef Karoui S, Leroi AM, Koning E, Menard JF, Michot F, Denis P (2000) Results of sphincteroplasty in 86 patients with anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:813–20PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Trowbridge ER, Morgan D, Trowbridge MJ, DeLancey JOL, Fenner DE (2006) Sexual function, quality of life, and severity of anal incontinence after anal sphincteroplasty. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1753–7PubMedCrossRef Trowbridge ER, Morgan D, Trowbridge MJ, DeLancey JOL, Fenner DE (2006) Sexual function, quality of life, and severity of anal incontinence after anal sphincteroplasty. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1753–7PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Malouf AJ, Chambers MG, Kamm MA (2001) Clinic and economic evaluation of surgical treatments for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 88:1029–36PubMedCrossRef Malouf AJ, Chambers MG, Kamm MA (2001) Clinic and economic evaluation of surgical treatments for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 88:1029–36PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Halverson AL, Hull TL (2002) Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 45:3451–8CrossRef Halverson AL, Hull TL (2002) Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 45:3451–8CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Norton C, Chelvanayagam S, Wilson-Barnett J, Redfern S, Kamm MA (2003) Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 125:1320–9PubMedCrossRef Norton C, Chelvanayagam S, Wilson-Barnett J, Redfern S, Kamm MA (2003) Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 125:1320–9PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson R, Furner S, Jesudason V (1998) Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1226–9PubMedCrossRef Nelson R, Furner S, Jesudason V (1998) Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1226–9PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chassagne P, Landrin I, Neveu C, Czernichow P, Bouaniche M, Doucet J et al (1999) Fecal incontinence in the institutionalized elderly: Incidence, risk factors, and prognosis. Am J Med 196:185–90CrossRef Chassagne P, Landrin I, Neveu C, Czernichow P, Bouaniche M, Doucet J et al (1999) Fecal incontinence in the institutionalized elderly: Incidence, risk factors, and prognosis. Am J Med 196:185–90CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Boreham MK, Richter HE, Kenton KS, Nager CW, Gregory WT, Aronson MP et al (2005) Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: Prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1637–42PubMedCrossRef Boreham MK, Richter HE, Kenton KS, Nager CW, Gregory WT, Aronson MP et al (2005) Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: Prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1637–42PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC (2006) Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1480–91PubMedCrossRef Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC (2006) Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1480–91PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of fecal incontinence. Gut 44:77–80PubMedCrossRef Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of fecal incontinence. Gut 44:77–80PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103–13PubMedCrossRef Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103–13PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bharucha A, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S (2006) Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1510–8PubMedCrossRef Bharucha A, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S (2006) Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1510–8PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A cross-sectional survey of the relationship between fecal incontinence and constipation
verfasst von
Eddie H. M. Sze
C. Debra Barker
Gerry Hobbs
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1851-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.