Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2014

01.04.2014 | Original Article

Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh

verfasst von: Laura C. Skoczylas, Lindsay C. Turner, Li Wang, Daniel G. Winger, Jonathan P. Shepherd

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

In 2008 and 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released notifications regarding vaginal mesh. In describing prolapse surgery trends over time, we predicted vaginal mesh use would decrease and native tissue repairs would increase.

Methods

Operative reports were reviewed for all prolapse repairs performed from 2008 to 2011 at our large regional hospital system. The number of each type of prolapse repair was determined per quarter year and expressed as a percentage of all repairs. Surgical trends were examined focusing on changes with respect to the release of two FDA notifications. We used linear regression to analyze surgical trends and chi-square for demographic comparisons.

Results

One thousand two hundred and eleven women underwent 1,385 prolapse procedures. Mean age was 64 ± 12, and 70 % had stage III prolapse. Vaginal mesh procedures declined over time (p = 0.001), comprising 27 % of repairs in early 2008, 15 % at the first FDA notification, 5 % by the second FDA notification, and 2 % at the end of 2011. The percentage of native tissue anterior/posterior repairs (p < 0.001) and apical suspensions (p = 0.007) increased, whereas colpocleisis remained constant (p = 0.475). Despite an overall decrease in open sacral colpopexies (p < 0.001), an initial increase was seen around the first FDA notification. We adopted laparoscopic/robotic techniques around this time, and the percentage of minimally invasive sacral colpopexies steadily increased thereafter (p < 0.001). All sacral colpopexies combined as a group declined over time (p = 0.011).

Conclusions

Surgical treatment of prolapse continues to evolve. Over a 4-year period encompassing two FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh and the introduction of laparoscopic/robotic techniques, we performed fewer vaginal mesh procedures and more native tissue repairs and minimally invasive sacral colpopexies.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S (2004) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD004014PubMed Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S (2004) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD004014PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonsson Funk M, Edenfield AL, Patet V, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Wu JM (2013) Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208:79.e1–7 Jonsson Funk M, Edenfield AL, Patet V, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Wu JM (2013) Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208:79.e1–7
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG (2011) Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 22:789–798PubMedCrossRef Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG (2011) Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 22:789–798PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Shveiky D, Bercik R, Sokol ER (2012) One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:86.e1–86.e9CrossRef Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Shveiky D, Bercik R, Sokol ER (2012) One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:86.e1–86.e9CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee on Gynecologic Practice (2012) Vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18:5–9 Committee on Gynecologic Practice (2012) Vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18:5–9
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Davila GW, Baessler K, Cosson M, Cardozo L (2012) Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the second IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:s7–s14PubMedCrossRef Davila GW, Baessler K, Cosson M, Cardozo L (2012) Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the second IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:s7–s14PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller D, Milani AL, Sutherland SE, Navin B, Rogers RG (2012) Informed surgical consent for a mesh/graft-augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Consensus of the second IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:s33–s42PubMedCrossRef Miller D, Milani AL, Sutherland SE, Navin B, Rogers RG (2012) Informed surgical consent for a mesh/graft-augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Consensus of the second IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:s33–s42PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C (2005) Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1752–1758PubMedCrossRef Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C (2005) Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1752–1758PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzgerald MP, Richter HE, Bradley CS, Ye W, Visco AC, Cundiff GW, Zyczynski HM, Fine P, Weber AM (2008) Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J 19:1603–1609CrossRef Fitzgerald MP, Richter HE, Bradley CS, Ye W, Visco AC, Cundiff GW, Zyczynski HM, Fine P, Weber AM (2008) Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J 19:1603–1609CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wyatt J (1912) Le Fort’s operation for prolapse, with an account of eight cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 22:266–269CrossRef Wyatt J (1912) Le Fort’s operation for prolapse, with an account of eight cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 22:266–269CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, Fine P, Menefee S, Ridgeway B, Visco A, Warren LK, Zhang M, Meikle S (2013) Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 309:2016–2024PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, Fine P, Menefee S, Ridgeway B, Visco A, Warren LK, Zhang M, Meikle S (2013) Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 309:2016–2024PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P, Slack M, Scot P, Waterfield M (2013) A randomized controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hystereectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24:377–384PubMedCrossRef Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P, Slack M, Scot P, Waterfield M (2013) A randomized controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hystereectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24:377–384PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD (2011) Laproscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118:1005–1013PubMedCrossRef Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD (2011) Laproscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118:1005–1013PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogo-Gupta L, Rodriguez LV, Litwin MS, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, Lu YS, Raz S, Hershman DL, Wright JD (2012) Trends in surgical mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse from 2000 to 2010. Obstet Gynecol 120:1105–1115PubMed Rogo-Gupta L, Rodriguez LV, Litwin MS, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, Lu YS, Raz S, Hershman DL, Wright JD (2012) Trends in surgical mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse from 2000 to 2010. Obstet Gynecol 120:1105–1115PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Araco F, Gravante G, Sorge R, De Vita D, Piccione E (2008) Risk evaluation of smoking and age on the occurrence of postoperative erosions after transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapses. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:473–479PubMedCrossRef Araco F, Gravante G, Sorge R, De Vita D, Piccione E (2008) Risk evaluation of smoking and age on the occurrence of postoperative erosions after transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapses. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:473–479PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Araco F, Gravante G, Sorge R, Overton J, De Vita D, Primicerio M, Dati S, Araco P, Piccione E (2009) The influence of BMI, smoking, and age on vaginal erosions after synthetic mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapses. A multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:772–780PubMedCrossRef Araco F, Gravante G, Sorge R, Overton J, De Vita D, Primicerio M, Dati S, Araco P, Piccione E (2009) The influence of BMI, smoking, and age on vaginal erosions after synthetic mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapses. A multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:772–780PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Elmér C, Falconer C, Hallin A, Larsson G, Ek M, Altman D, Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2012) Risk factors for mesh complications after trocar guided transvaginal mesh kit repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 31:1165–1169PubMedCrossRef Elmér C, Falconer C, Hallin A, Larsson G, Ek M, Altman D, Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2012) Risk factors for mesh complications after trocar guided transvaginal mesh kit repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 31:1165–1169PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowman JK, Woodman PJ, Nosti PA, Bump RC, Terry CL, Hale DS (2008) Tobacco use is a risk factor for mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:561.e1–561.e4CrossRef Lowman JK, Woodman PJ, Nosti PA, Bump RC, Terry CL, Hale DS (2008) Tobacco use is a risk factor for mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:561.e1–561.e4CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113:367–373PubMedCrossRef Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113:367–373PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehsani N, Ghafar MA, Antosh DD, Tan-Kim J, Warner WB, Mamik MM, Brown HW, Chung CP, Segal S, Abed H, Murphy M, Stolzfus JC, Molden SM (2012) Risk factors for mesh extrusion after prolapse surgery: a case–control study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18:357–361PubMedCrossRef Ehsani N, Ghafar MA, Antosh DD, Tan-Kim J, Warner WB, Mamik MM, Brown HW, Chung CP, Segal S, Abed H, Murphy M, Stolzfus JC, Molden SM (2012) Risk factors for mesh extrusion after prolapse surgery: a case–control study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18:357–361PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh
verfasst von
Laura C. Skoczylas
Lindsay C. Turner
Li Wang
Daniel G. Winger
Jonathan P. Shepherd
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2014
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2231-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe

EditorialNotes

Urogynecology digest

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.