Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.08.2015 | Original Article
The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 8/2015
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Our objective was to assess episiotomy technique used in Israeli hospitals, to determine factors influencing incision parameters, and to review relevant up-to-date professional literature.
Methods
Using anonymous questionnaires, a survey was conducted among obstetricians and midwives in the four public hospitals in northern Israel over a 1-year period commencing in October 2013. In addition to demographic and professional data, the accoucheurs were asked to describe the technique they usually use to perform an episiotomy (length, angle, and distance of initiation point from midperineum).
Results
Overall, 84 obstetricians and 32 midwives participated in the survey. Only 37.6 % reported performing a mediolateral episiotomy, while the rest described the lateral type, placing the initiation point at an average distance of 2.45 ± 0.88 cm from the fourchette. Compared with midwives, obstetricians reported performing a significantly longer episiotomy (3.53 ± 1.01 vs. 2.73 ± 0.81 cm, p = 0.0002).
Conclusions
According to our study and relevant literature review, the technique of episiotomy varies significantly between health professionals and is not uniformly congruent with international practice guidelines. In part, this is derived from unclear literature evidence and lack of consensus definition for proper technique of this procedure by the national guidelines. Thus, further higher-quality research, uniform protocols, and educational programs are needed to guide episiotomy practice.