Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 11/2015

01.11.2015 | Original Article

The indication for hysterectomy as a risk factor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair

verfasst von: Rune Lykke, Jan Blaakær, Bent Ottesen, Helga Gimbel

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 11/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the indication for hysterectomy was itself a risk factor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in Danish women who underwent hysterectomy from 1977 to 2009.

Methods

Data from 154,882 women who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions during the period 1977 – 2009 were extracted from the Danish National Patient Register. Patients were followed up from hysterectomy to POP surgery, death/emigration, or end of study period. Hazard ratios (HR) for the first POP surgery in each woman were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis for each indication for hysterectomy was performed using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.

Results

Fibroids/polyps as the indication was used as the reference when calculating HRs. After adjustment for calendar period, patient age, and hysterectomy route, the HR for POP was 6.57 (95 % confidence interval 5.91 – 7.30). The HR for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), pain, endometriosis, and “other indications” was significantly higher than the reference. POP surgery was performed predominantly in the posterior compartment for all indications except benign ovarian tumors.

Conclusions

POP as the indication for hysterectomy was associated with the highest cumulative incidence of subsequent POP surgery 32 years after hysterectomy. But the indications AUB, pain, endometriosis, and “other indications” were associated with a higher risk of subsequent POP surgery after hysterectomy than the indication fibroids/polyps. The predominant compartment for POP surgery was the posterior compartment for almost all indications. The indication for hysterectomy and the compartment in which POP surgery was performed subsequent to hysterectomy were associated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lykke R, Blaakaer J, Ottesen B, Gimbel H (2015) Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery among Danish women hysterectomized for benign conditions: age at hysterectomy, age at subsequent POP operation, and risk of POP after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 26:527–532. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2490-y CrossRefPubMed Lykke R, Blaakaer J, Ottesen B, Gimbel H (2015) Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery among Danish women hysterectomized for benign conditions: age at hysterectomy, age at subsequent POP operation, and risk of POP after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 26:527–532. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-014-2490-y CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F (2008) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:572.e1–572.e6CrossRef Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F (2008) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:572.e1–572.e6CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M (1997) Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:579–585CrossRefPubMed Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M (1997) Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:579–585CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ 3rd, Schleck CD, Babalola EO, Zinsmeister AR et al (2007) Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:664.e1–664.e7CrossRef Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ 3rd, Schleck CD, Babalola EO, Zinsmeister AR et al (2007) Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:664.e1–664.e7CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2007) Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 110:625–632CrossRefPubMed Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2007) Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 110:625–632CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2008) Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1623–1629. doi:10.1007/s00192-008-0718-4 CrossRefPubMed Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2008) Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1623–1629. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-008-0718-4 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsgren C, Lundholm C, Johansson AL, Cnattingius S, Zetterstrom J, Altman D (2012) Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:43–48. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1523-z CrossRefPubMed Forsgren C, Lundholm C, Johansson AL, Cnattingius S, Zetterstrom J, Altman D (2012) Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:43–48. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-011-1523-z CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lidegaard O, Hammerum MS (2002) The National Patient Registry as a tool for continuous production and quality control. Ugeskr Laeger 164:4420–4423PubMed Lidegaard O, Hammerum MS (2002) The National Patient Registry as a tool for continuous production and quality control. Ugeskr Laeger 164:4420–4423PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ottesen M (2009) Validity of the registration and reporting of vaginal prolapse surgery. Ugeskr Laeger 171:404–408PubMed Ottesen M (2009) Validity of the registration and reporting of vaginal prolapse surgery. Ugeskr Laeger 171:404–408PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cruikshank SH, Kovac SR (1999) Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:859–865CrossRefPubMed Cruikshank SH, Kovac SR (1999) Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:859–865CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The indication for hysterectomy as a risk factor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair
verfasst von
Rune Lykke
Jan Blaakær
Bent Ottesen
Helga Gimbel
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2015
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2757-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2015

International Urogynecology Journal 11/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.