Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016

01.01.2016 | Review Article

Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Maribel De Gouveia De Sa, Leica Sarah Claydon, Barry Whitlow, Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Pelvic organ prolapse is showing an increasing prevalence (3 – 50 %). The gold standard treatment of apical prolapse is sacrocolpopexy which can be performed via minimal access (laparoscopy or robotics) or open approaches. The aim of this review was to appraise the effectiveness of minimal access surgery versus the open approach in the treatment of apical prolapse.

Methods

Keywords were searched in: CINAHL, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Cochrane MDSG Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Current Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Trials Registry Platform search portal, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases. Data up to 31 April 2014 were considered. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials evaluating all women who underwent minimally invasive sacropexy (MISC) and open sacropexy (OSC) were included. A data extraction tool was used for data collection. MISC was compared with OSC using narrative analysis and meta-analysis (RevMan) where appropriate.

Results

MISC and OSC were compared in 12 studies involving 4,757 participants. MISC and OSC were equally effective in terms of point-C POP-Q measurements and recurrence rate. MISC was associated with a lower transfusion rate (odds ratio 0.41, 95 % CI 0.20 – 0.83), shorter length of hospital stay (mean difference −1.57 days, 95 % CI −1.91 – −1.23 days), and less blood loss (mean difference −113.27 mL, 95 % CI −163.67 – −62.87 mL) but a longer operating time (mean difference 87.47, 95 % CI 58.60 – 116.34, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

MISC showed similar anatomic results to OSC with a lower transfusion rate, shorter length of hospital stay and less blood loss. The rate of other complications was similar between the approaches. Cautious interpretation of results is advised due to risk of bias caused by the inclusion of nonrandomized studies.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24(11):1783–1790PubMedCrossRef Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24(11):1783–1790PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Toozs-Hobson P, Kelvin B, Cardozo L (1998) Management of vaginal vault prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:13–17PubMedCrossRef Toozs-Hobson P, Kelvin B, Cardozo L (1998) Management of vaginal vault prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:13–17PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner DA, Shaw C, McGrother CW, Dallosso HM, Cooper NJ (2004) The cost of clinically significant urinary storage symptoms for community dwelling adults in the UK. BJU Int 93(9):1246–1252PubMedCrossRef Turner DA, Shaw C, McGrother CW, Dallosso HM, Cooper NJ (2004) The cost of clinically significant urinary storage symptoms for community dwelling adults in the UK. BJU Int 93(9):1246–1252PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian D, Szwarcensztein K, Mauskopf JA, Slack MC (2009) Rate, type, and cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Germany, France, and England. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144(2):177–181PubMedCrossRef Subramanian D, Szwarcensztein K, Mauskopf JA, Slack MC (2009) Rate, type, and cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Germany, France, and England. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144(2):177–181PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CF, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed Maher CF, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yohannes P, Rotariua P, Pintoa P, Smitha A, Leea B (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60(1):39–45PubMedCrossRef Yohannes P, Rotariua P, Pintoa P, Smitha A, Leea B (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60(1):39–45PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97(12):1772–1783PubMedCrossRef Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97(12):1772–1783PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Song H, Clarke J (2012) Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD008978PubMed Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Song H, Clarke J (2012) Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD008978PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins J, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester Higgins J, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Serati M, Bogani G, Sorice P, Braga A, Torella M, Salvatore S et al (2014) Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 66(2):303–318PubMedCrossRef Serati M, Bogani G, Sorice P, Braga A, Torella M, Salvatore S et al (2014) Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 66(2):303–318PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006) Systematic reviews in the social science: a practical guide. Blackwell, OxfordCrossRef Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006) Systematic reviews in the social science: a practical guide. Blackwell, OxfordCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nosti PA, Umoh AU, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L et al (2014) Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 20(1):33–37PubMedCrossRef Nosti PA, Umoh AU, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L et al (2014) Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 20(1):33–37PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pulliam SJ, Weinstein MM, Wakamatsu MM (2012) Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(2):122–126PubMedCrossRef Pulliam SJ, Weinstein MM, Wakamatsu MM (2012) Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(2):122–126PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross J, Preston M (2005) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: five-year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(3):221–226PubMedCrossRef Ross J, Preston M (2005) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: five-year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(3):221–226PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McGovern DPB, Summerskill WSM, Valori RM, Levi M (2001) Key topics in evidence-based medicine. Bios, Oxford McGovern DPB, Summerskill WSM, Valori RM, Levi M (2001) Key topics in evidence-based medicine. Bios, Oxford
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Davis G, Dmochowski RR et al (2001) The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:178–186PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Davis G, Dmochowski RR et al (2001) The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:178–186PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cochrane Informatics & Knowledge Management Department (2014) RevMan. Cochrane Informatics & Knowledge Management Department (2014) RevMan.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins SA, Tulikangas PK, O’Sullivan DM (2012) Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:438.e1–e6CrossRef Collins SA, Tulikangas PK, O’Sullivan DM (2012) Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:438.e1–e6CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206PubMedCrossRef Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Coolen AWM, van Oudheusden AMJ, van Eijndhoven HWF, van der Heijden TFM, Stokmans RA, Mol BJ, et al. (2013) A comparison of complications between open abdominal sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013:528636 Coolen AWM, van Oudheusden AMJ, van Eijndhoven HWF, van der Heijden TFM, Stokmans RA, Mol BJ, et al. (2013) A comparison of complications between open abdominal sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013:528636
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O’Brien MM, McBride AW (2009) A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(3):273–279PubMedCrossRef Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O’Brien MM, McBride AW (2009) A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(3):273–279PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER, Comiter CV, Payne CK, Chen B (2012) Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis. J Urol 187(2):638–643PubMedCrossRef Elliott CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER, Comiter CV, Payne CK, Chen B (2012) Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis. J Urol 187(2):638–643PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC (2012) Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes. Urology 79(3):532–536PubMedCrossRef Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC (2012) Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes. Urology 79(3):532–536PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoyte L, Rabbanifard R, Mezzich J, Bassaly R, Downes K (2012) Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(6):335–339PubMedCrossRef Hoyte L, Rabbanifard R, Mezzich J, Bassaly R, Downes K (2012) Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(6):335–339PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan A, Alperin M, Wu N, Clemens JQ, Dubina E, Pashos CL, Anger JT (2013) Comparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among Medicare beneficiaries. Int Urogynecol J 24(11):1883–1891PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Khan A, Alperin M, Wu N, Clemens JQ, Dubina E, Pashos CL, Anger JT (2013) Comparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among Medicare beneficiaries. Int Urogynecol J 24(11):1883–1891PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyson MD, Wolter CE (2015) A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy. Neurourol Urodyn 34(2):151–155PubMedCrossRef Tyson MD, Wolter CE (2015) A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy. Neurourol Urodyn 34(2):151–155PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P et al (2013) A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24(3):377–384PubMedCrossRef Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P et al (2013) A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24(3):377–384PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Paraiso MFR, Walters M, Rackley R, Melek S, Hugney C (2005) Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1752–1758PubMedCrossRef Paraiso MFR, Walters M, Rackley R, Melek S, Hugney C (2005) Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1752–1758PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyagi V, Hawthorn R, Guerrero K (2013) Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) - A Cohort Study Looking at Short, Medium and Long Term Outcome. Medical & Surgical Urology 2(118). Tyagi V, Hawthorn R, Guerrero K (2013) Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) - A Cohort Study Looking at Short, Medium and Long Term Outcome. Medical & Surgical Urology 2(118).
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24:1815–1833 Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24:1815–1833
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Goffinet F, Bréart G, Dubuisson JB (2002) Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynaecologic pathology. Results of a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 17(5):1334–1342 Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Goffinet F, Bréart G, Dubuisson JB (2002) Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynaecologic pathology. Results of a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 17(5):1334–1342
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Claerhout F, Roovers JP, Lewi P, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2009) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy – a single centre’s experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(9):1119–1125 Claerhout F, Roovers JP, Lewi P, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J (2009) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy – a single centre’s experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(9):1119–1125
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, Fachel JM, Furness S, Garry R, et al. (2009) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004751 Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, Fachel JM, Furness S, Garry R, et al. (2009) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004751
34.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Orden SG, Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Callejo D, Pérez T (2008) Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(4):395–401 de la Orden SG, Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Callejo D, Pérez T (2008) Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(4):395–401
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Maribel De Gouveia De Sa
Leica Sarah Claydon
Barry Whitlow
Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2765-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.