Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2018

20.11.2017 | Original Article

Uterus-sparing vaginolaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical pelvic organ prolapse

verfasst von: Atef Darwish, Mostafa Bahlol, AbdelGhafar Ahmad, Mohamed Fekry

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our aim was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of a vaginolaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VLS) technique for treating apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Materials and methods

This was a prospective interventional case series (design classification: Canadian Task Force II3) performed in the endoscopic unit of a tertiary care referral facility and university hospital. We assessed 15 symptomatic parous women with stage ≥2 apical POP according to the POP Quantification (POP-Q) classification. Interventions comprised posterior colpotomy with mesh fixation to the uterosacral ligaments and the back of the uterus that was further fixed to the anterior longitudinal ligament of the sacrum using a tacker via laparoscopy.

Results

The main outcome was a significant postoperative improvement in prolapse and resultant improvement in quality of life (QoL) after VLS. Six patients required concomitant reconstructive procedures. Mean operative time for the vaginal phase was 8.54 ± 3.10 (7–12) min and 32.36 ± 8.2 (27–41) min. for the laparoscopic phase Mean duration of VLS ranged from 30 to 50 min. At the 6-months follow-up, the procedure was successful in 14 of 15 patients (93.34%); one woman (6.66%) presented with recurrence at a lower stage. Neither mesh complications nor sacral ostitis were encountered. There was significant improvement in vaginal symptoms, sexual well-being, QoL, and clinical staging after the procedure.

Conclusion

By eliminating all forms of intraperitoneal suturing, performing a posterior colpotomy, and the advent of tackers without evidence of sacral ostitis, VLS seems to be a simple, feasible, effective, and fast approach for treating POP.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501.CrossRef Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mawajdeh SM, Al-Qutob RJ, Farag A. Prevalence and risk factors of genital prolapse. A multicenter study. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(2):161–5.PubMed Mawajdeh SM, Al-Qutob RJ, Farag A. Prevalence and risk factors of genital prolapse. A multicenter study. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(2):161–5.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dieter AA, Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Epidemiological trends and future care needs for pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(5):380–4.CrossRef Dieter AA, Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Epidemiological trends and future care needs for pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(5):380–4.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark AL, Gregory T, Smith VJ, Edwards R. Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(5):1261–7.CrossRef Clark AL, Gregory T, Smith VJ, Edwards R. Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(5):1261–7.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygaad IE, Mc Creery R, Brubaker L. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy :a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;104:805–23.CrossRef Nygaad IE, Mc Creery R, Brubaker L. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy :a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;104:805–23.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization ofterminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floordysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization ofterminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floordysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P. Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ vaginal symptoms questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG. 2006;113:700–12.CrossRef Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P. Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ vaginal symptoms questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG. 2006;113:700–12.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Downing KT. Uterine Prolapse: from antiquity to today. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:1–9.CrossRef Downing KT. Uterine Prolapse: from antiquity to today. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:1–9.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLancey JO, Morley GW. Total colpocleisis for vaginal eversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(6):1228–32.CrossRef DeLancey JO, Morley GW. Total colpocleisis for vaginal eversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(6):1228–32.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dällenbach P. To mesh or not to mesh: a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgery. Int J Womens Health 2015; 7: 331–343. Dällenbach P. To mesh or not to mesh: a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgery. Int J Womens Health 2015; 7: 331–343.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Scarpero HM, Cespedes RD, Winters JC. Transabdominal approach to repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Tech Urol. 2001;7(2):139–45.PubMed Scarpero HM, Cespedes RD, Winters JC. Transabdominal approach to repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Tech Urol. 2001;7(2):139–45.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284–91.CrossRef Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284–91.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Elvira BV, Brătilă PC, Andra-Teodora N. Vaginally-assisted laparoscopic Hysterosacropexy for advanced Utero-vaginal Prolapse: a series of 32 patients. ARS Medica Tomitana. 2014;2(77):63–7.CrossRef Elvira BV, Brătilă PC, Andra-Teodora N. Vaginally-assisted laparoscopic Hysterosacropexy for advanced Utero-vaginal Prolapse: a series of 32 patients. ARS Medica Tomitana. 2014;2(77):63–7.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Campos S, Billone V, Durão M, Beguinot M. BourdelN, Rabischong B, Canis M, Botchorishvili R. Complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: as harmless as they seem? Acta Obstet Ginecol Port. 2016;10(1):21–31. Campos S, Billone V, Durão M, Beguinot M. BourdelN, Rabischong B, Canis M, Botchorishvili R. Complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: as harmless as they seem? Acta Obstet Ginecol Port. 2016;10(1):21–31.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised noninferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.CrossRef Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised noninferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD. Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):103–9.CrossRef Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD. Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):103–9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016–24.CrossRef Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016–24.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:Cd012079.PubMed Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:Cd012079.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Uterus-sparing vaginolaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical pelvic organ prolapse
verfasst von
Atef Darwish
Mostafa Bahlol
AbdelGhafar Ahmad
Mohamed Fekry
Publikationsdatum
20.11.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3511-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.