nach oben

Erschienen in:

10.02.2020 | AUGS-IUGA Joint Publication

Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse

verfasst von: Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are common, but standardization of surgical terms is needed to improve the quality of investigation and clinical care around these procedures. The American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecologic Association convened a joint writing group consisting of 5 designees from each society to standardize terminology around common surgical terms in POP repair including the following: sacrocolpopexy (including sacral colpoperineopexy), sacrocervicopexy, uterosacral ligament suspension, sacrospinous ligament fixation, iliococcygeus fixation, uterine preservation prolapse procedures or hysteropexy (including sacrohysteropexy, uterosacral hysteropexy, sacrospinous hysteropexy, anterior abdominal wall hysteropexy, Manchester procedure), anterior prolapse procedures (including anterior vaginal repair, anterior vaginal repair with graft, and paravaginal repair), posterior prolapse procedures (including posterior vaginal repair, posterior vaginal repair with graft, levator plication, and perineal repair), and obliterative prolapse repairs (including colpocleisis with hysterectomy, colpocleisis without hysterectomy, and colpocleisis of the vaginal vault). Each of these terms is clearly defined in this document including the required steps of the procedure, surgical variations, and recommendations for procedural terminology.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Wu JM, Dieter AA, Pate VJ, et al. Cumulative incidence of a subsequent surgery after stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):1124–30.PubMedPubMedCentral

Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(1):3–15.PubMed

Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(5):527–35.PubMed

Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):165–94.PubMed

Jeppson PC, Balgobin S, Washington BB, et al. Recommended standardized terminology of the anterior female pelvis based on a structured medical literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):26–39.PubMed

Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.PubMed

Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1962;20:72–7.PubMed

Arthure HG, Savage D. Uterine prolapse and prolapse of the vaginal vault treated by sacral hysteropexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64(3):355–60.PubMed

Abernethy M, Vasquez E, Kenton K, et al. Where do we place the sacrocolpopexy stitch? A magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(1):31–3.PubMed

10.

Good MM, Abele TA, Balgobin S, et al. Preventing L5-S1 discitis associated with sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2 Pt 1):285–90.PubMed

11.

Amid P. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall surgery. Hernia. 1997;1(1):15–21.

12.

Illiano E, Ditonno P, Giannitsas K, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for high-stage pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective, randomized, single-center study. Urology. 2019;134(134):116–23.PubMed

13.

Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, et al. Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(1):49–55.PubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Costantini E, Mearini L, Lazzeri M, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2016;196(1):159–65.PubMed

15.

Snyder TE, Krantz KE. Abdominal-retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for the correction of vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(6):944–9.PubMed

16.

Addison WA, Timmons MC, Wall LL, et al. Failed abdominal sacral colpopexy: observations and recommendations. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74(3 Pt 2):480–3.PubMed

17.

Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):805–23.PubMed

18.

Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376.PubMed

19.

Whitehead WE, Bradley CS, Brown MB, et al. Pelvic Floor Network. Gastrointestinal complications following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(1):78.e71–7.

20.

Lansman HH. Posthysterectomy vault prolapse: sacral colpopexy with dura mater graft. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63(4):577–82.PubMed

21.

Hendee AE, Berry CM. Abdominal sacropexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981;24(4):1217–26.PubMed

22.

Salamon CG, Lewis C, Priestley J, et al. Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1371–5.PubMed

23.

Culligan PJ, Salamon C, Priestley JL, et al. Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):143–51.PubMed

24.

Nosti PA, Carter CM, Sokol AI, et al. Transvaginal versus transabdominal placement of synthetic mesh at time of sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(3):151–5.PubMed

25.

Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coates K, et al. Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(6):1345–53.PubMed

26.

Grimes CL, Quiroz LH, Gutman RE, et al. Long-term impact of abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy on symptoms of obstructed defecation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(4):234–7.PubMed

27.

Link RE, Su LM, Bhayani SB, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy for treatment of perineal body descent and vaginal vault prolapse. Urology. 2004;64(1):145–7.PubMed

28.

Rosenblatt PL, Chelmow D, Ferzandi TR. Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse: a retrospective case series report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(3):268–72.PubMed

29.

van Zanten F, Schraffordt Koops SE, O'Sullivan OE, et al. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bicentre prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2019;126(8):1065–73.PubMed

30.

Bataller E, Ros C, Angles S, et al. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(4):545–55.PubMed

31.

Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(15):1557–66.PubMed

32.

Miller N. A new method of correcting complete inversion of the vagina: with or without complete prolapse; report of two cases. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1927:550–5.

33.

Webb MJ, Aronson MP, Ferguson LK, et al. Posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: primary repair in 693 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(2):281–5.PubMed

34.

Rardin CR, Erekson EA, Sung VW, et al. Uterosacral colpopexy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of laparoscopic and vaginal approaches. J Reprod Med. 2009;54(5):273–80.PubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Houlihan S, Kim-Fine S, Birch C, et al. Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(4):611–21.PubMed

36.

McCall ML. Posterior culdeplasty; surgical correction of enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy; a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol. 1957;10(6):595–602.PubMed

37.

Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Williams NL. A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;126(5):568–73.PubMed

38.

Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, et al. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1365–73.PubMed

39.

Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, et al. Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1402–10.PubMed

40.

Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, et al. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(15):1554–65.PubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Restaino S, Ronsini C, Finelli A, et al. Laparoscopic approach for Shull repair of pelvic floor defects. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(6):954.PubMed

42.

Panico G, Campagna G, Caramazza D, et al. Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension: an alternative route for a traditional technique. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1227–9.PubMed

43.

Cohen SA, Carberry CL, Smilen SW. American Urogynecologic Society Consensus Statement: cystoscopy at the time of prolapse repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(4):258–9.PubMed

44.

Jenkins VR 2nd. Uterosacral ligament fixation for vaginal vault suspension in uterine and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(6):1337–43.PubMed

45.

Karram M, Goldwasser S, Kleeman S, et al. High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1339–42.PubMed

46.

Spelzini F, Frigerio M, Manodoro S, et al. Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):65–71.PubMed

47.

Fatton B, Dwyer PL, Achtari C, et al. Bilateral extraperitoneal uterosacral vaginal vault suspension: a 2-year follow-up longitudinal case series of 123 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20(4):427–34.

48.

Karmakar D, Dwyer PL, Thomas E, Schierlitz L. Extraperitoneal uterosacral suspension technique for post hysterectomy apical prolapse in 472 women: results from a longitudinal clinical study. BJOG. 2019;126(4):536–42.PubMed

49.

Unger CA, Walters MD, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MF. Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):603.e601–7.

50.

Sagsoz N, Ersoy M, Kamaci M, Tekdemir I. Anatomical landmarks regarding sacrospinous colpopexy operations performed for vaginal vault prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;101(1):74–8.PubMed

51.

Sederl J. Surgery in prolapse of a blind-end vagina [in German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1958;18(6):824–8.PubMed

52.

Richter K. The surgical anatomy of the vaginaefixatio sacrospinalis vaginalis. A contribution to the surgical treatment of vaginal blind pouch prolapse [in German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1968;28(4):321–7.PubMed

53.

Wang Y, Wang D, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(1):83–9.PubMed

54.

Randall CL, Nichols DH. Surgical treatment of vaginal inversion. Obstet Gynecol. 1971;38(3):327–32.PubMed

55.

Larson KA, Smith T, Berger MB, et al. Long-term patient satisfaction with Michigan four-wall sacrospinous ligament suspension for prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):967–75.PubMed

56.

Manning JA, Arnold P. A review of six sacrospinous suture devices. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54(6):558–63.PubMed

57.

Cespedes RD. Anterior approach bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Urology. 2000;56(6 suppl 1):70–5.PubMed

58.

Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Alessandri F, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy using the Capio suture-capturing device versus traditional technique: feasibility and outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(2):267–74.PubMed

59.

Mowat A, Wong V, Goh J, et al. A descriptive study on the efficacy and complications of the Capio (Boston Scientific) suturing device for sacrospinous ligament fixation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58(1):119–24.PubMed

60.

Lo TS, Horng SG, Huang HJ, et al. Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(10):992–5.PubMed

61.

Seitz M, Jirschele K, Tran A, Iyer S, Gafni-Kane A, Tomezsko J, et al. A comparison of sacrospinous hysteropexy augmented with polypropylene mesh versus human dermis at 12-month follow-up: an ambidirectional study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000640.

62.

Jirschele K, Seitz M, Zhou Y, Rosenblatt P, Culligan P, Sand P. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):743–8.PubMed

63.

Geoffrion R, Hyakutake MT, Koenig NA, et al. Bilateral sacrospinous vault fixation with tailored synthetic mesh arms: clinical outcomes at one year. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(2):129–37.PubMed

64.

Rahkola-Soisalo P, Mikkola TS, Altman D, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the uphold vaginal support system: 5-year follow-up. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(3):200–5.PubMed

65.

Scotti RJ, Garely AD, Greston WM, Flora RF, Olson TR. Paravaginal repair of lateral vaginal wall defects by fixation to the ischial periosteum and obturator membrane. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(6 Pt 1):1436–45.PubMed

66.

Kearney R, DeLancey JO. Selecting suspension points and excising the vagina during Michigan four-wall sacrospinous suspension. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(2):325–30.PubMed

67.

Lo TS, Akhtar Bt Nawawi E, Al-Kharabsheh AM. Anterior approach unilateral right sacrospinous fixation for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse following multiple colorectal surgeries. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30(8):1141–2.PubMed

68.

Serati M, Braga A, Bogani G, et al. Iliococcygeus fixation for the treatment of apical vaginal prolapse: efficacy and safety at 5 years of follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(7):1007–12.PubMed

69.

Inmon WB. Pelvic relaxation and repair including prolapse of vagina following hysterectomy. South Med J. 1963;56:577–82.PubMed

70.

Shull BL, Capen CV, Riggs MW, et al. Bilateral attachment of the vaginal cuff to iliococcygeus fascia: an effective method of cuff suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(6 Pt 1):1669–74.PubMed

71.

Meeks GR, Washburne JF, McGehee RP, et al. Repair of vaginal vault prolapse by suspension of the vagina to iliococcygeus (prespinous) fascia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(6):1444–52.PubMed

72.

Thornton WN Jr, Peters WA 3rd. Repair of vaginal prolapse after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147(2):140–8.PubMed

73.

Paz-Levy D, Yohay D, Neymeyer J, et al. Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(2):181–9.PubMed

74.

Morley GW, DeLancey JO. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for eversion of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(4):872–81.PubMed

75.

Zhang QX, Lang JH, Zhu L, et al. Clinical anatomic study on ischial spinous fascia fixation [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009;44(5):350–3.PubMed

76.

DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(6 Pt 1):1717–24.PubMed

77.

Ross WT, Meister MR, Shepherd JP, et al. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(4):436.e431–8.

78.

Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129–146.e122.PubMed

79.

Costantini E, Lazzeri M, Zucchi A, et al. Five-year outcome of uterus sparing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a single-center experience. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(3):287–92.PubMed

80.

Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, et al. A randomized comparison of post-operative pain, quality of life, and physical performance during the first 6 weeks after abdominal or vaginal surgical correction of descensus uteri. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(4):334–40.PubMed

81.

Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson JB, Lange S, et al. Uterus-preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a patient-centred outcome report and video of a continuous series of 245 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(3):491–3.PubMed

82.

Hsieh CH. A new laparoscopic technique for uterine prolapse: one-sided uterine fixation through the round ligament. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):213–9.PubMed

83.

Joshi VM, Otiv SR, Dagade VB, et al. Pectineal ligament hysteropexy for uterine prolapse in premenopausal women by open and laparoscopic approach in Indian urban and rural centers. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(4):215–9.PubMed

84.

Khanam RA, Rubaiyat A, Azam MS. Sling for correcting uterine prolapse: twelve years experience. Mymensingh Med J. 2014;23(1):13–7.PubMed

85.

Romanzi LJ, Tyagi R. Hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy for uterine prolapse surgery: does durability differ? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(5):625–31.PubMed

86.

Kow N, Goldman HB, Ridgeway B. Uterine conservation during prolapse repair: 9-year experience at a single institution. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(3):126–31.PubMed

87.

Bedford ND, Seman EI, O'Shea RT, et al. Effect of uterine preservation on outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(2):172–7.PubMed

88.

Rosen DM, Shukla A, Cario GM, et al. Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(6):729–34.PubMed

89.

Diwan A, Rardin CR, Strohsnitter WC, Weld A, Rosenblatt P, Kohli N. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(1):79–83.PubMed

90.

Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.PubMedPubMedCentral

91.

Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, et al. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209–16.PubMed

92.

Khandwala S. Transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: one-year outcome analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):84–9.PubMed

93.

Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, et al. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(1):38.e31–11.

94.

Milani AL, Withagen MI, Vierhout ME. Outcomes and predictors of failure of trocar-guided vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(5):440.e1–8.

95.

Oversand SH, Staff AC, Spydslaug AE, Svenningsen R, Borstad E. Long-term follow-up after native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(1):81–9.PubMed

96.

Conger GT, Keettel WC. The Manchester-Fothergill operation, its place in gynecology; a review of 960 cases at university hospitals, Iowa City, Iowa. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1958;76(3):634–40.PubMed

97.

Tipton RH, Atkin PF. Uterine disease after the Manchester repair operation. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1970;77(9):852–3.PubMed

98.

Ayhan A, Esin S, Guven S, et al. The Manchester operation for uterine prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;92(3):228–33.PubMed

99.

Szczesniewska A, Szpakowski M, Wladzinski J, et al. (UN)Forgotten Neugebauer-Le Fort operation. Paramedian closure of the vagina—safe and effective surgical procedure for treating of pelvic organ prolapse in older women. Ginekol Pol. 2015;86(3):198–202.PubMed

100.

Gutman R, Maher C. Uterine-preserving POP surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1803–13.PubMed

101.

Ameline A, Huguier J. Posterior suspension to the lumbo-sacral disk; abdominal method of replacement of the utero-sacral ligaments [in French]. Gynecol Obstet (Paris). 1957;56(1):94–8.

102.

Huguier J, Scali P. Posterior suspension of the genital axis on the lumbosacral disk in the treatment of uterine prolapse [in French]. Presse Med. 1958;66(35):781–4.PubMed

103.

Diwan A, Rardin CR, Kohli N. Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15(4):286–92.PubMed

104.

Kow N, Goldman HB, Ridgeway B. Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14(5):395–402.PubMed

105.

Paek J, Lee M, Kim BW, et al. Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(4):593–9.PubMed

106.

Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, et al. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):93–101.PubMed

107.

Gracia M, Perello M, Bataller E, et al. Comparison between laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy and subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: a pilot study. NeurourolUrodyn. 2015;34(7):654–8.

108.

Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson J, Constantin F, et al. Uterus preservation is superior to hysterectomy when performing laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(4):557–64.PubMed

109.

Rimailho J, Talbot C, Bernard JD, et al. Anterolateral hysteropexy via abdominal approach. Results and indications. Apropos of a series of 92 patients [in French]. Ann Chir. 1993;47(3):244–9.PubMed

110.

Li S, Ji M, Zhao Z. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;188:74–8.PubMed

111.

van Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CI, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH. Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14(5):350–5; discussion 355.PubMed

112.

Dietz V, de Jong J, Huisman M, Schraffordt Koops S, Heintz P, van der Vaart H. The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(11):1271–6.PubMed

113.

Florian-Rodriguez ME, Hare A, Chin K, et al. Inferior gluteal and other nerves associated with sacrospinous ligament: a cadaver study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):646.e1–6.

114.

Weber AM, Walters MD. Anterior vaginal prolapse: review of anatomy and techniques of surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(2):311–8.PubMed

115.

Lensen EJ, Withagen MI, Kluivers KB, et al. Surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a historical review with emphasis on the anterior compartment. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(10):1593–602.PubMed

116.

Halpern-Elenskaia K, Umek W, Bodner-Adler B, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy: a standard operation? Systematic review of the technical aspects of a common procedure in randomized controlled trials. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(6):781–8.PubMed

117.

Shull BL, Benn SJ, Kuehl TJ. Surgical management of prolapse of the anterior vaginal segment: an analysis of support defects, operative morbidity, and anatomic outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(6):1429–36; discussion 1436-1429.PubMed

118.

van Geelen JM, Dwyer PL. Where to for pelvic organ prolapse treatment after the FDA pronouncements? A systematic review of the recent literature. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;24(5):707–18.

119.

Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh Implants. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/implants-and-prosthetics/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants. Accessed July 3, 2019.

120.

Lopes TSN, Hilton P, Monaghan J. Bonney's Gynaecological Surgery. 12th ed: Wiley-Blackwell; 2018; Hoboken, NJ. Pages: 161–192.

121.

Baggish MKM. Atlas of pelvic anatomy and gynecologic surgery. 2nd ed: Saunders Elsevier; 2006.

122.

Fairclough E, Myers J, Smith ARB, et al. A UK questionnaire survey of current techniques used to perform pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(9):1367–76.PubMedPubMedCentral

123.

White GR. Cystocele—a radical cure by suturing lateral sulci of the vagina to the white line of pelvic fascia. 1909. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997;8(5):288–92.PubMed

124.

Richardson AC, Edmonds PB, Williams NL. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to paravaginal fascial defect. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57(3):357–62.PubMed

125.

Scarpero HM, Cespedes RD, Winters JC. Transabdominal approach to repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Tech Urol. 2001;7(2):139–45.PubMed

126.

DeLancey JO. Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(4):815–23.PubMed

127.

Paraiso MF, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1762–71.PubMed

128.

Kim S, Pollock GR, Twiss CO, et al. Surgery for posterior compartment vaginal prolapse: graft augmented repair. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(1):87–95.PubMed

129.

Jeffcoate TN. Posterior colpoperineorrhaphy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1959;77(3):490–502.PubMed

130.

Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36(4):976–83.PubMed

131.

Noe GK, Alkatout I, Schiermeier S, et al. Laparoscopic anterior and posterior native tissue repair: a new pelvic floor approach. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019;28(4):241–6.PubMed

132.

Zimmermann EF, Hayes RS, Daniels IR, Smart NJ, Warwick AM. Transperineal rectocele repair: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87(10):773–9.PubMed

133.

Karram M, Maher C. Surgery for posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;24(11):1835–41.

134.

Glavind K, Christiansen AG. Site-specific colporrhaphy in posterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(5):735–9.PubMed

135.

Schmidlin-Enderli K, Schuessler B. A new rectovaginal fascial plication technique for treatment of rectocele with obstructed defecation: a proof of concept study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;24(4):613–9.

136.

Kanter G, Jeppson PC, McGuire BL, et al. Perineorrhaphy: commonly performed yet poorly understood. A survey of surgeons. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(12):1797–801.PubMed

137.

Haylen BT, Younis M, Naidoo S, et al. Perineorrhaphy quantitative assessment (Pe-QA). Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(4):539–44.PubMed

138.

Christmann-Schmid C, Wierenga AP, Frischknecht E, Maher C. A prospective observational study of the classification of the perineum and evaluation of perineal repair at the time of posterior colporrhaphy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(6):453–9.PubMed

139.

Rouzier R, Haddad B, Deyrolle C, et al. Perineoplasty for the treatment of introital stenosis related to vulvar lichen sclerosus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(1):49–52.PubMed

140.

Baggish M. Atlas of Pelvic Anatomy and Gynecologic Surgery. 3rd ed. Saint Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2010.

141.

FitzGerald MP, Richter HE, Siddique S, Thompson P, Zyczynski H, Ann Weber for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Colpocleisis: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(3):261–71.PubMed

142.

Zebede S, Smith AL, Plowright LN, et al. Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis in a large group of elderly women. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2 Pt 1):279–84.PubMed

143.

Fitzgerald MP, Richter HE, Bradley CS, Ye W, Visco AC, Cundiff GW, et al. Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(12):1603–9.PubMedPubMedCentral

144.

von Pechmann WS, Mutone M, Fyffe J, Hale DS. Total colpocleisis with high levator plication for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(1):121–6.

145.

Hill AJ, Walters MD, Unger CA. Perioperative adverse events associated with colpocleisis for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):501.e1–6.

146.

Denehy TR, Choe JY, Gregori CA, et al. Modified Le Fort partial colpocleisis with Kelly urethral plication and posterior colpoperineoplasty in the medically compromised elderly: a comparison with vaginal hysterectomy, anterior colporrhaphy, and posterior colpoperineoplasty. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(6):1697–701.PubMed

147.

Agarwala N, Hasiak N, Shade M. Graft interposition colpocleisis, perineorrhaphy, and tension-free sling for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in elderly patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(6):740–5.PubMed

148.

Dessie SG, Rosenblatt PL. Use of a vessel loop to ensure tunnel patency during LeFort colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(10):1541–3.PubMed

149.

Koski ME, Chow D, Bedestani A, Togami JM, Chesson RR, Winters JC. Colpocleisis for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Urology. 2012;80(3):542–6.PubMed

150.

DeLancey JO, Morley GW. Total colpocleisis for vaginal eversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(6):1228–32.PubMed

151.

Petrikovets A, Fisher T, Krudy C, Sheyn D, Mangel J, Mahajan ST. LeFort colpocleisis: a step-by-step simulation video for female pelvic surgeons. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(6):917–9.PubMed

152.

Constantin F, Veit-Rubin N, Ramyead L, et al. Rouhier's colpocleisis with concomitant vaginal hysterectomy: an instructive video for female pelvic surgeons. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(3):495–7.PubMed

153.

Hanes CR 2nd. Vaginal sacral colpopexy: a natural orifice approach to a gold standard procedure. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(1):47–52.PubMed

154.

Chen Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Hua K. Transvaginal single-port laparoscopy sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(4):585–8.PubMed

155.

Liu J, Kohn J, Sun B, Guan Z, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery Sacrocolpopexy: tips and tricks. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(1):38–9.PubMed

156.

Panel P, Soffray F, Roussillon E, et al. Glue mesh fixation: feasibility, tolerance and complication assessment. Results 24 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(4):333–8.PubMed

157.

Lamblin G, Dubernard G, de Saint Hilaire P, et al. Assessment of synthetic glue for mesh attachment in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a prospective multicenter pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(1):41–7.PubMed

158.

Estrade JP, Gurriet B. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a vaginal prosthetic adhesive. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(6S):S67.PubMed

159.

Liu J, Bardawil E, Lin Q, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery tubal reanastomosis: a novel route for tubal surgery. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(1):182.PubMed

160.

Emmerson SJ, Gargett CE. Endometrial mesenchymal stem cells as a cell based therapy for pelvic organ prolapse. World J Stem Cells. 2016;8(5):202–15.PubMedPubMedCentral

161.

Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet. 2017;389(10067):381–92.PubMed

162.

Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1357–62.PubMed

163.

Grimes CL, Tan-Kim J, Whitcomb EL, Lukacz ES, Menefee SA. Long-term outcomes after native tissue vs. biological graft-augmented repair in the posterior compartment. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2012;23(5):597–604.

164.

Marinaro F, Sanchez-Margallo FM, Alvarez V, Lopez E, Tarazona R, Brun MV, et al. Meshes in a mess: mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies for soft tissue reinforcement. Acta Biomater. 2019;85:60–74.PubMed

165.

FDA takes action to protect women's health, orders manufacturers of surgical mesh intended for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse to stop selling all devices. (2019) U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-action-protect-womens-health-orders-manufacturers-surgical-mesh-intended-transvaginal?fbclid=IwAR3oWEZrmFQTtrwNJTfPfR6ZnOnTYGKJP6SnUlrblSHSiaqvqlkqCJUdgvs. Accessed October 25, 2019 2019.

Titel: Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse
verfasst von: Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association
Publikationsdatum: 10.02.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04236-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Validity of bladder volume measurement by ultrasound in women postpartum

Are women attending a midwifery-led birthing center at increased risk of anal sphincter injury?

Childbirth after mid-urethral sling surgery: effects on long-term success and complications

The consequences of undiagnosed obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) following vaginal delivery

Risk factors for perineal trauma in the primiparous population during non-operative vaginal delivery

Association of race with anal incontinence in parous women

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie