Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International 1/2010

01.01.2010 | Original Article

The effects of a FRAX® revision for the USA

verfasst von: J. A. Kanis, H. Johansson, A. Oden, B. Dawson-Hughes, L. J. Melton III, E. V. McCloskey

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 1/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

A revision (version 3.0) of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®) is developed based on an update of epidemiological information for the USA. With the revised tool, there were strong correlations (r > 0.99) between versions 2.0 and 3.0 for FRAX® estimates of fracture probability, but the revised models gave lower probability estimates.

Introduction

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a revision of the epidemiological data used to compute fracture probabilities in the USA with FRAX®.

Methods

Models were constructed to compute fracture probabilities based on updated fracture incidence and mortality rates in the USA. The models comprised the ten-year probability of hip fracture and the ten-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture, both including femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD). For each model, fracture and death hazards were computed as continuous functions. The effect of the revised rates on fracture probability was examined by piecewise linear regression using multiple combinations of clinical risk factors and BMD.

Results

At all ages, there was a strong correlation (r > 0.99) between version 2.0 and revised FRAX® estimates of fracture probability. For a major osteoporotic fracture, the revised model gave lower median probabilities by 13% to 24% in men, depending on age, and by 19% to 24% in women. For hip fracture probability, the revised model gave lower median fracture probabilities by 40% and 27% at the ages of 50 and 60 years in men and by 43% and 30%, respectively, in women. At the ages of 70 years and older the revised model gave similar hip fracture probabilities as version 2.0 in both men and women.

Conclusion

The revised FRAX® model for the USA (version 3.0) does not alter the ranking of fracture probabilities but provides lower probability estimates than version 2.0, particularly, in younger women and men.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK Kanis JA, on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–486CrossRefPubMed Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–486CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Oglesby A (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Oglesby A (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Melton LJ III, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM (1999) Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: Comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time. Osteoporos Int 9:29–37CrossRefPubMed Melton LJ III, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM (1999) Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: Comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time. Osteoporos Int 9:29–37CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Melton LJ III, Kearns AE, Atkinson EJ et al (2009) Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence. Osteoporos Int 20:687–694CrossRefPubMed Melton LJ III, Kearns AE, Atkinson EJ et al (2009) Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence. Osteoporos Int 20:687–694CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zingmond DS, Melton LJ III, Silverman SL (2004) Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000. Osteoporos Int 15:603–610CrossRefPubMed Zingmond DS, Melton LJ III, Silverman SL (2004) Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000. Osteoporos Int 15:603–610CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiebert R, Aharonoff GB, Capla EL et al (2005) Temporal and geographic variation in hip fracture rates for people aged 65 or older, New York State, 1985–1996. Am J Orthop 34:252–255PubMed Hiebert R, Aharonoff GB, Capla EL et al (2005) Temporal and geographic variation in hip fracture rates for people aged 65 or older, New York State, 1985–1996. Am J Orthop 34:252–255PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH et al (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475CrossRefPubMed Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH et al (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson AN, Melton LJ III et al (2008) Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int 19:449–458CrossRefPubMed Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson AN, Melton LJ III et al (2008) Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int 19:449–458CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Melton LJ 3rd, Kanis JA, Johnell O (2005) Potential impact of osteoporosis treatment on hip fracture trends. J Bone Miner Res 20:895–897CrossRefPubMed Melton LJ 3rd, Kanis JA, Johnell O (2005) Potential impact of osteoporosis treatment on hip fracture trends. J Bone Miner Res 20:895–897CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Binkley N, Kiebzak GM, Michael Lewiecki EM E et al (2005) Recalculation of the NHANES Database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence. J Bone Miner Res 20:195–201CrossRefPubMed Binkley N, Kiebzak GM, Michael Lewiecki EM E et al (2005) Recalculation of the NHANES Database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence. J Bone Miner Res 20:195–201CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UK. Bone 36:22–32CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UK. Bone 36:22–32CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Borgstrom F, Johansson H, De Laet C et al (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in men and women: a study based on data from Sweden. Osteoporos Int 16:6–14CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Borgstrom F, Johansson H, De Laet C et al (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in men and women: a study based on data from Sweden. Osteoporos Int 16:6–14CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B, Rehnberg C (2006) At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International Intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1459–1471CrossRefPubMed Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B, Rehnberg C (2006) At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International Intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1459–1471CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A, National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX®—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:1395–1408 Erratum Osteoporos Int 2009;20: 499–502CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A, National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX®—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:1395–1408 Erratum Osteoporos Int 2009;20: 499–502CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Tosteson AN, Melton LJ III, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S, National Osteoporosis Foundation Guide Committee et al (2008) Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int 19:437–447CrossRefPubMed Tosteson AN, Melton LJ III, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S, National Osteoporosis Foundation Guide Committee et al (2008) Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int 19:437–447CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The effects of a FRAX® revision for the USA
verfasst von
J. A. Kanis
H. Johansson
A. Oden
B. Dawson-Hughes
L. J. Melton III
E. V. McCloskey
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-1033-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2010

Osteoporosis International 1/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.