Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International 6/2011

01.06.2011 | Original Article

Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: results from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts

verfasst von: W. D. Leslie, C. Berger, L. Langsetmo, L. M. Lix, J. D. Adachi, D. A. Hanley, G. Ioannidis, R. G. Josse, C. S. Kovacs, T. Towheed, S. Kaiser, W. P. Olszynski, J. C. Prior, S. Jamal, N. Kreiger, D. Goltzman, Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) Research Group

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 6/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

A procedure for creating a simplified version of fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®) is described. Calibration, fracture prediction, and concordance were compared with the full FRAX tool using two large, complementary Canadian datasets.

Introduction

The Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada (CAROC) system for fracture risk assessment is based upon sex, age, bone mineral density (BMD), prior fragility fracture, and glucocorticoid use. CAROC does not require computer or web access, and categorizes 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk as low (<10%), moderate (10–20%), or high (>20%).

Methods

Basal CAROC fracture risk tables (by age, sex, and femoral neck BMD) were constructed from Canadian FRAX probabilities for major osteoporotic fractures (adjusted for prevalent clinical risk factors). We assessed categorization and fracture prediction with the updated CAROC system in the CaMos and Manitoba BMD cohorts.

Results

The new CAROC system demonstrated high concordance with the Canadian FRAX tool for risk category in both the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts (89% and 88%). Ten-year fracture outcomes in CaMos and Manitoba BMD cohorts showed good discrimination and calibration for both CAROC (6.1–6.5% in low-risk, 13.5–14.6% in moderate-risk, and 22.3–29.1% in high-risk individuals) and FRAX (6.1–6.6% in low-risk, 14.4–16.1% in moderate-risk, and 23.4–31.0% in high-risk individuals). Reclassification from the CAROC risk category to a different risk category under FRAX occurred in <5% for low-risk, 20–24% for moderate-risk, and 27–30% for high-risk individuals. Reclassified individuals had 10-year fracture outcomes that were still within or close to the original nominal-risk range..

Conclusion

The new CAROC system is well calibrated to the Canadian population and shows a high degree of concordance with the Canadian FRAX tool. The CAROC system provides s a simple alternative when it is not feasible to use the full Canadian FRAX tool.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Melton LJ III, Christiansen C et al (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis [see comments]. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–41PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Melton LJ III, Christiansen C et al (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis [see comments]. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–41PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–89PubMedCrossRef Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–89PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H et al (2008) A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Bone 42:467–75PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H et al (2008) A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Bone 42:467–75PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA et al (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164:1108–12PubMedCrossRef Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA et al (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164:1108–12PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cranney A, Jamal SA, Tsang JF et al (2007) Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women. CMAJ 177:575–80PubMed Cranney A, Jamal SA, Tsang JF et al (2007) Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women. CMAJ 177:575–80PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Langsetmo L, Goltzman D, Kovacs CS et al (2009) Repeat low-trauma fractures occur frequently among men and women who have osteopenic BMD. J Bone Miner Res 24:1515–22PubMedCrossRef Langsetmo L, Goltzman D, Kovacs CS et al (2009) Repeat low-trauma fractures occur frequently among men and women who have osteopenic BMD. J Bone Miner Res 24:1515–22PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H et al (2007) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada: a shift to absolute fracture risk assessment. J Clin Densitom 10:120–3PubMedCrossRef Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H et al (2007) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada: a shift to absolute fracture risk assessment. J Clin Densitom 10:120–3PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2001) Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:989–95PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2001) Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:989–95PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–82PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–82PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2004) A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 19:893–9PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2004) A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 19:893–9PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Adachi JD, Olszynski WP, Hanley DA et al (2000) Management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 29:228–51PubMedCrossRef Adachi JD, Olszynski WP, Hanley DA et al (2000) Management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 29:228–51PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Lix LM (2009) Simplified system for absolute fracture risk assessment: clinical validation in Canadian women. J Bone Miner Res 24:353–60PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Lix LM (2009) Simplified system for absolute fracture risk assessment: clinical validation in Canadian women. J Bone Miner Res 24:353–60PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, Lix LM (2010) Simplified 10-year absolute fracture risk assessment: a comparison of men and women. J Clin Densitom 13:141–6PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Lix LM (2010) Simplified 10-year absolute fracture risk assessment: a comparison of men and women. J Clin Densitom 13:141–6PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Jean S et al (2009) Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA 302:883–9PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Jean S et al (2009) Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA 302:883–9PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H et al (2009) FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–43PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H et al (2009) FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–43PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–46PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–46PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, Lix D, Langsetmo L, et al. (2010) Construction of a FRAX model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment. Osteoporis Int (in press) Leslie WD, Lix D, Langsetmo L, et al. (2010) Construction of a FRAX model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment. Osteoporis Int (in press)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen P, Krege JH, Adachi JD et al (2009) Vertebral fracture status and the World Health Organization risk factors for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 24:495–502PubMedCrossRef Chen P, Krege JH, Adachi JD et al (2009) Vertebral fracture status and the World Health Organization risk factors for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 24:495–502PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreiger N, Tenenhouse A, Joseph L et al (1999) Research notes: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) - background, rationale, methods. Can J Aging 18:376–87CrossRef Kreiger N, Tenenhouse A, Joseph L et al (1999) Research notes: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) - background, rationale, methods. Can J Aging 18:376–87CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–97PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–97PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger C, Langsetmo L, Joseph L et al (2009) Association between change in BMD and fragility fracture in women and men. J Bone Miner Res 24:361–70PubMedCrossRef Berger C, Langsetmo L, Joseph L et al (2009) Association between change in BMD and fragility fracture in women and men. J Bone Miner Res 24:361–70PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Genant HK, Grampp S, Gluer CC et al (1994) Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 9:1503–14PubMedCrossRef Genant HK, Grampp S, Gluer CC et al (1994) Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 9:1503–14PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Roos NP, Shapiro E (1999) Revisiting the manitoba centre for health policy and evaluation and its population-based health information system. Med Care 37:JS10–JS14PubMedCrossRef Roos NP, Shapiro E (1999) Revisiting the manitoba centre for health policy and evaluation and its population-based health information system. Med Care 37:JS10–JS14PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (2005) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Norwegian Institute for Public Health, Oslo WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (2005) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Norwegian Institute for Public Health, Oslo
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kozyrskyj AL, Mustard CA (1998) Validation of an electronic, population-based prescription database. Ann Pharmacother 32:1152–7PubMedCrossRef Kozyrskyj AL, Mustard CA (1998) Validation of an electronic, population-based prescription database. Ann Pharmacother 32:1152–7PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Caetano PA et al (2007) Effectiveness of bone density measurement for predicting osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:77–81PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Caetano PA et al (2007) Effectiveness of bone density measurement for predicting osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:77–81PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, Metge C (2003) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom 6:275–82PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Metge C (2003) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom 6:275–82PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, MacWilliam L, Lix L et al (2005) A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service. Osteoporos Int 16:773–82PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, MacWilliam L, Lix L et al (2005) A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service. Osteoporos Int 16:773–82PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, Caetano PA, MacWilliam LR et al (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8:25–30PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Caetano PA, MacWilliam LR et al (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8:25–30PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD (2006) The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice. Bone 39:361–8PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD (2006) The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice. Bone 39:361–8PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Janes H, Pepe MS, Gu W (2008) Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables. Ann Intern Med 149:751–60PubMed Janes H, Pepe MS, Gu W (2008) Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables. Ann Intern Med 149:751–60PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H et al (2005) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 56:178–88PubMed Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H et al (2005) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 56:178–88PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Lagace C et al (2009) Population-based Canadian hip fracture rates with international comparisons. Osteoporos Int 21:1317–1322PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Lagace C et al (2009) Population-based Canadian hip fracture rates with international comparisons. Osteoporos Int 21:1317–1322PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–44PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–44PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraser L, Langsetmo L, Berger C et al (2010). Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX tool: a population-based report from CaMos. Osteoporis Int (in press) Fraser L, Langsetmo L, Berger C et al (2010). Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX tool: a population-based report from CaMos. Osteoporis Int (in press)
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H et al (2010) Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX((R)) tool: Fracture prediction and model calibration. J Bone Miner Res. doi:10.1002/jbmr.123 Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H et al (2010) Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX((R)) tool: Fracture prediction and model calibration. J Bone Miner Res. doi:10.​1002/​jbmr.​123
Metadaten
Titel
Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: results from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts
verfasst von
W. D. Leslie
C. Berger
L. Langsetmo
L. M. Lix
J. D. Adachi
D. A. Hanley
G. Ioannidis
R. G. Josse
C. S. Kovacs
T. Towheed
S. Kaiser
W. P. Olszynski
J. C. Prior
S. Jamal
N. Kreiger
D. Goltzman
Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) Research Group
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1445-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2011

Osteoporosis International 6/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.