Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International 7/2013

01.07.2013 | Original Article

Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis

verfasst von: S. Silverman, A. Calderon, K. Kaw, T. B. Childers, B. A. Stafford, W. Brynildsen, A. Focil, M. Koenig, D. T. Gold

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 7/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

We studied the ranking of osteoporosis (OP) medication attributes in a convenience sample of four different racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Our study showed that postmenopausal women differ in the ranking of OP medication attributes based on age, educational level, income, and prior fracture history.

Introduction

Decision making about OP medication-related behavior relies heavily on patient preferences about specific medication attributes. Patients may decide to initiate, change, or stop therapies based on ranking of perceived attributes of the therapy and their personal attitudes toward those attributes. We used MaxDiff, a form of conjoint analysis (Ryan and Farrar 2000), to explore patient weighting of attributes across four racial/ethnic groups at two sites in the United States and defined four critical attributes that influence such decisions (safety, efficacy, cost, and convenience) from qualitative interviews.

Methods

We recruited a sample of 367 Postmenopausal (PM) women at risk of OP fractures from four racial/ethnic groups: Caucasian (n = 100), African American (n = 100), Asian American (n = 82), and Hispanic American (n = 85). Respondents completed a laptop-based questionnaire that included demographic items, several short scales on medical care preference and OP patient perceptions, and a MaxDiff procedure that determines comparative ranking of attributes either as least important or most important to their decisions.

Results

MaxDiff analyses were done to evaluate the relative weight of specific statements for each participant and to determine whether racial/ethnic groups differed across dimensions. Overall, participants in all four groups rated efficacy > safety > cost > convenience.

Conclusions

Although there were no significant differences among the racial/ethnic groups on overall ranking of attributes, subgroup analyses revealed significant impact of age, education, income, and prior fracture on these decisions. The findings from this study suggest that postmenopausal women differ in their ranking of OP medication attributes, and healthcare providers must account for personal preferences in their communication about and selection of OP medications.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D (2006) Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum 55(5):729–735CrossRefPubMed Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D (2006) Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum 55(5):729–735CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D (2007) Patient willingness to take teriparatide. Patient Educ Couns 65(2):237–244CrossRefPubMed Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D (2007) Patient willingness to take teriparatide. Patient Educ Couns 65(2):237–244CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barry MJ (2011) Helping patients make better personal decisions: the promise of patient centered health outcomes research. JAMA 306:1258–1259CrossRefPubMed Barry MJ (2011) Helping patients make better personal decisions: the promise of patient centered health outcomes research. JAMA 306:1258–1259CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, et al. (2009) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3:CD 001431 O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, et al. (2009) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3:CD 001431
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Bekker-Grob E, Essink-Bot M, Meerding W, Koes B, Steyerberg E (2009) Preferences of GPs and patients for preventive osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. PharmacoEconomics 27(3):211–219CrossRefPubMed de Bekker-Grob E, Essink-Bot M, Meerding W, Koes B, Steyerberg E (2009) Preferences of GPs and patients for preventive osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. PharmacoEconomics 27(3):211–219CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee S, Glendenning P, Inderjeeth C (2011) Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009. Osteoporos Int 22(3):741–753CrossRefPubMed Lee S, Glendenning P, Inderjeeth C (2011) Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009. Osteoporos Int 22(3):741–753CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Constantinescu F, Goucher S, Weinstein A, Fraenkel L (2009) Racial disparities in treatment preferences for rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care 47(3):350–355CrossRefPubMed Constantinescu F, Goucher S, Weinstein A, Fraenkel L (2009) Racial disparities in treatment preferences for rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care 47(3):350–355CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Constantinescu F, Goucher S, Weinstein A, Smith W, Fraenkel L (2009) Understanding why rheumatoid arthritis patient treatment preferences differ by race. Arthritis Rheum 61(4):413–418CrossRefPubMed Constantinescu F, Goucher S, Weinstein A, Smith W, Fraenkel L (2009) Understanding why rheumatoid arthritis patient treatment preferences differ by race. Arthritis Rheum 61(4):413–418CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Piette J, Heisler M, Harand A, Juip M (2010) Beliefs about prescription medications among patients with diabetes: variation across racial groups and influences on cost-related medication underuse. J Health Care Poor Underserved 21(1):349–361CrossRefPubMed Piette J, Heisler M, Harand A, Juip M (2010) Beliefs about prescription medications among patients with diabetes: variation across racial groups and influences on cost-related medication underuse. J Health Care Poor Underserved 21(1):349–361CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Qato D, Lindau S, Conti R, Schumm L, Alexander G (2010) Racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular medication use among older adults in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 19(8):834–842CrossRefPubMed Qato D, Lindau S, Conti R, Schumm L, Alexander G (2010) Racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular medication use among older adults in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 19(8):834–842CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, Constantinescu F, Oberto-Medina M, Wittink DR (2005) Women’s preferences for prevention of bone loss. J Rheumatol 32(6):1086–1092PubMed Fraenkel L, Constantinescu F, Oberto-Medina M, Wittink DR (2005) Women’s preferences for prevention of bone loss. J Rheumatol 32(6):1086–1092PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Darbà J, Restovic G, Kaskens L, Balbona MA, Carbonell A, Cavero P, Jordana M, Prieto C, Molina A, Padró I (2011) Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1947–1954CrossRefPubMed Darbà J, Restovic G, Kaskens L, Balbona MA, Carbonell A, Cavero P, Jordana M, Prieto C, Molina A, Padró I (2011) Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1947–1954CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall D, Bridges J, Johnson F et al (2010) Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported?: an update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient 3(4):249–256CrossRefPubMed Marshall D, Bridges J, Johnson F et al (2010) Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported?: an update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient 3(4):249–256CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan M, McIntosh E, Shackley P (1998) Using conjoint analysis to assess consumer preferences in primary care: an application to the patient health card. Heal Expect 1:11729 Ryan M, McIntosh E, Shackley P (1998) Using conjoint analysis to assess consumer preferences in primary care: an application to the patient health card. Heal Expect 1:11729
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Orme B (2009) Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Second edition. Research Pub Lic, Madison Orme B (2009) Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Second edition. Research Pub Lic, Madison
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan M, Farrar S (2000) Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. Br Med J 320(1):1530–1533CrossRef Ryan M, Farrar S (2000) Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. Br Med J 320(1):1530–1533CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadarette SM, Gignac MAM, Jaglal SB et al (2009) Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. BMC Res Notes 2:133CrossRefPubMed Cadarette SM, Gignac MAM, Jaglal SB et al (2009) Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. BMC Res Notes 2:133CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganther JM, Wiederholt JB, Kreling DH (2001) Measuring patients’ medical care preferences: care seeking versus self-treating. Med Dec Making 21(2):133–140 Ganther JM, Wiederholt JB, Kreling DH (2001) Measuring patients’ medical care preferences: care seeking versus self-treating. Med Dec Making 21(2):133–140
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2003) Hierarchical models. In: Part II: fundamentals for Bayesian data analysis: Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2003) Hierarchical models. In: Part II: fundamentals for Bayesian data analysis: Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Metadaten
Titel
Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis
verfasst von
S. Silverman
A. Calderon
K. Kaw
T. B. Childers
B. A. Stafford
W. Brynildsen
A. Focil
M. Koenig
D. T. Gold
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2241-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2013

Osteoporosis International 7/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.