Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International 11/2015

01.11.2015 | Original Article

Effective secondary fracture prevention: implementation of a global benchmarking of clinical quality using the IOF Capture the Fracture® Best Practice Framework tool

verfasst von: M. K. Javaid, C. Kyer, P. J. Mitchell, J. Chana, C. Moss, M. H. Edwards, A. R. McLellan, J. Stenmark, D. D. Pierroz, M. C. Schneider, J. A. Kanis, K. Akesson, C. Cooper, IOF Fracture Working Group, EXCO

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 11/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

Fracture Liaison Services are the best model to prevent secondary fractures. The International Osteoporosis Foundation developed a Best Practice Framework to provide a quality benchmark. After a year of implementation, we confirmed that a single framework with set criteria is able to benchmark services across healthcare systems worldwide.

Introduction

Despite evidence for the clinical effectiveness of secondary fracture prevention, translation in the real-world setting remains disappointing. Where implemented, a wide variety of service models are used to deliver effective secondary fracture prevention. To support use of effective models of care across the globe, the International Osteoporosis Foundation’s Capture the Fracture® programme developed a Best Practice Framework (BPF) tool of criteria and standards to provide a quality benchmark. We now report findings after the first 12 months of implementation.

Methods

A questionnaire for the BPF was created and made available to institutions on the Capture the Fracture website. Responses from institutions were used to assign gold, silver, bronze or black (insufficient) level of achievements mapped across five domains. Through an interactive process with the institution, a final score was determined and published on the Capture the Fracture website Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) map.

Results

Sixty hospitals across six continents submitted their questionnaires. The hospitals served populations from 20,000 to 15 million and were a mix of private and publicly funded. Each FLS managed 146 to 6200 fragility fracture patients per year with a total of 55,160 patients across all sites. Overall, 27 hospitals scored gold, 23 silver and 10 bronze. The pathway for the hip fracture patients had the highest proportion of gold grading while vertebral fracture the lowest.

Conclusion

In the first 12 months, we have successfully tested the BPF tool in a range of health settings across the globe. Initial findings confirm a significant heterogeneity in service provision and highlight the importance of a global approach to ensure high quality secondary fracture prevention services.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(12):1726–1733CrossRefPubMed Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(12):1726–1733CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernlund E (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):136PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hernlund E (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):136PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359(9319):1761–1767CrossRefPubMed Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359(9319):1761–1767CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsh D et al (2011) Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2051–2065CrossRefPubMed Marsh D et al (2011) Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2051–2065CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisman JA et al (2012) Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res 27(10):2039–2046CrossRefPubMed Eisman JA et al (2012) Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res 27(10):2039–2046CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganda K et al (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24(2):393–406CrossRefPubMed Ganda K et al (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24(2):393–406CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sale JE et al (2011) Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2067–2082CrossRefPubMed Sale JE et al (2011) Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2067–2082CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Canada O (2014) Quality standards for fracture liaison services in Canada Canada O (2014) Quality standards for fracture liaison services in Canada
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zealand ON (2014) Fracture liaison services resource pack Zealand ON (2014) Fracture liaison services resource pack
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams J et al (2011) Vertebral fracture teaching program Adams J et al (2011) Vertebral fracture teaching program
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindley RI (2014) Hip fracture: the case for a funded national registry. Med J Aust 201(7):368–369CrossRefPubMed Lindley RI (2014) Hip fracture: the case for a funded national registry. Med J Aust 201(7):368–369CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Heikkinen T et al (2005) Evaluation of 238 consecutive patients with the extended data set of the Standardised Audit for Hip Fractures in Europe (SAHFE). Disabil Rehabil 27(18–19):1107–1115CrossRefPubMed Heikkinen T et al (2005) Evaluation of 238 consecutive patients with the extended data set of the Standardised Audit for Hip Fractures in Europe (SAHFE). Disabil Rehabil 27(18–19):1107–1115CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Currie CT, Hutchison JD (2005) Audit, guidelines and standards: clinical governance for hip fracture care in Scotland. Disabil Rehabil 27(18–19):1099–1105CrossRefPubMed Currie CT, Hutchison JD (2005) Audit, guidelines and standards: clinical governance for hip fracture care in Scotland. Disabil Rehabil 27(18–19):1099–1105CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fadda V et al (2014) Gastrointestinal and renal side effects of bisphosphonates: differentiating between no proof of difference and proof of no difference. J Endocrinol Invest Fadda V et al (2014) Gastrointestinal and renal side effects of bisphosphonates: differentiating between no proof of difference and proof of no difference. J Endocrinol Invest
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang KH et al (2014) Increased risk of dementia in patients with osteoporosis: a population-based retrospective cohort analysis. Age (Dordr) 36(2):967–975CrossRef Chang KH et al (2014) Increased risk of dementia in patients with osteoporosis: a population-based retrospective cohort analysis. Age (Dordr) 36(2):967–975CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Knopp-Sihota JA et al (2014) Dementia diagnosis and osteoporosis treatment propensity: a population-based nested case-control study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 14(1):121–129CrossRefPubMed Knopp-Sihota JA et al (2014) Dementia diagnosis and osteoporosis treatment propensity: a population-based nested case-control study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 14(1):121–129CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gleason LJ et al (2012) Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in high-risk patients prior to hip fracture. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3(2):79–83PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gleason LJ et al (2012) Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in high-risk patients prior to hip fracture. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3(2):79–83PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Burch J et al (2014) Systematic review of the use of bone turnover markers for monitoring the response to osteoporosis treatment: the secondary prevention of fractures, and primary prevention of fractures in high-risk groups. Health Technol Assess 18(11):1–180CrossRefPubMed Burch J et al (2014) Systematic review of the use of bone turnover markers for monitoring the response to osteoporosis treatment: the secondary prevention of fractures, and primary prevention of fractures in high-risk groups. Health Technol Assess 18(11):1–180CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasikaran S et al (2011) International osteoporosis foundation and international federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine position on bone marker standards in osteoporosis. Clin Chem Lab Med 49(8):1271–1274CrossRefPubMed Vasikaran S et al (2011) International osteoporosis foundation and international federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine position on bone marker standards in osteoporosis. Clin Chem Lab Med 49(8):1271–1274CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell KJ et al (2009) Value of routine monitoring of bone mineral density after starting bisphosphonate treatment: secondary analysis of trial data. BMJ 338:b2266PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bell KJ et al (2009) Value of routine monitoring of bone mineral density after starting bisphosphonate treatment: secondary analysis of trial data. BMJ 338:b2266PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiligsmann M et al (2013) Interventions to improve osteoporosis medication adherence and persistence: a systematic review and literature appraisal by the ISPOR Medication Adherence & Persistence Special Interest Group. Osteoporos Int 24(12):2907–2918CrossRefPubMed Hiligsmann M et al (2013) Interventions to improve osteoporosis medication adherence and persistence: a systematic review and literature appraisal by the ISPOR Medication Adherence & Persistence Special Interest Group. Osteoporos Int 24(12):2907–2918CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat White HJ et al (2010) A systematic review assessing the effectiveness of interventions to improve persistence with anti-resorptive therapy in women at high risk of clinical fracture. Fam Pract 27(6):593–603CrossRefPubMed White HJ et al (2010) A systematic review assessing the effectiveness of interventions to improve persistence with anti-resorptive therapy in women at high risk of clinical fracture. Fam Pract 27(6):593–603CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rietbrock S, Olson M, van Staa TP (2009) The potential effects on fracture outcomes of improvements in persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates. QJM 102(1):35–42CrossRefPubMed Rietbrock S, Olson M, van Staa TP (2009) The potential effects on fracture outcomes of improvements in persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates. QJM 102(1):35–42CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Effective secondary fracture prevention: implementation of a global benchmarking of clinical quality using the IOF Capture the Fracture® Best Practice Framework tool
verfasst von
M. K. Javaid
C. Kyer
P. J. Mitchell
J. Chana
C. Moss
M. H. Edwards
A. R. McLellan
J. Stenmark
D. D. Pierroz
M. C. Schneider
J. A. Kanis
K. Akesson
C. Cooper
IOF Fracture Working Group
EXCO
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2015
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3192-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2015

Osteoporosis International 11/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.