Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International 11/2020

01.07.2020 | Review

Persistence and adherence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies: a systematic review

verfasst von: G. Koller, V. Goetz, B. Vandermeer, J. Homik, F. A. McAlister, D. Kendler, C. Ye

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 11/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of low bone mass and fragility. Treatment is frequently compromised by suboptimal medication compliance causing increased morbidity. This review investigates adherence and persistence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies. Findings reveal parenteral medications requiring reduced dosing frequency have higher compliance than oral therapies. This systematic review examines real-world adherence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies. We searched PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE databases for English language observational studies that examined patient adherence and/or persistence to parenteral osteoporosis treatments (teriparatide sc, ibandronate iv, zoledronic acid iv, and denosumab sc) in adults with osteoporosis published up to September 2018. Studies with only self-reported adherence or persistence data and those with less than 20 patients were excluded. Quality assessment of included studies was completed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). We identified 40 eligible studies. Teriparatide was examined in 29 studies, with persistence rates of 10–87% (median 55%) at 1 year and 10–69% (median 29.5%) at 2 years, and adherence rates of 21–89% (median 53%) at 1 year and 37–68% (median 40%) at 2 years. Ten studies of zoledronic acid reported persistence rates of 34–73% (median 42%) for second dose and 20–54% (median 35.8%) for third dose. Ten studies of ibandronate adherence reported and 2-year persistence rates of 31–58% (median 47.5%) in 1 year and 13–35% (median 25%) at 2 years, and adherence rates of 21–72% (median 47.3%) and 15–58% (median 36.5%) respectively. Denosumab was reported in 19 studies, with second (1 year) and fourth (2 year) dose persistence rates of 61–100% (median 81%) and 36–99% (median 45.5%). There is substantial heterogeneity in reports of persistence and adherence rates with parenteral osteoporosis therapies. Most of the published data are from short-term studies and evaluations of long-term adherence and persistence with parenteral therapies for osteoporosis are needed.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubbard T, Paradis R (2015) Real world evidence: executive summary a new era for health care innovation. Netw Excell Heal Innov:1–19 Hubbard T, Paradis R (2015) Real world evidence: executive summary a new era for health care innovation. Netw Excell Heal Innov:1–19
26.
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerse N, Buetow S, Mainous AG et al (2004) Physician-patient relationship and medication compliance: a primary care investigation. Ann Fam Med 2:455–461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kerse N, Buetow S, Mainous AG et al (2004) Physician-patient relationship and medication compliance: a primary care investigation. Ann Fam Med 2:455–461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Persistence and adherence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies: a systematic review
verfasst von
G. Koller
V. Goetz
B. Vandermeer
J. Homik
F. A. McAlister
D. Kendler
C. Ye
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2020
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05507-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2020

Osteoporosis International 11/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.