Abstract
The organoleptic aspects of pharmaceutical formulations affect their acceptability to the patient and hence can have an important effect on concordance with treatment. Objective evaluation of these aspects, particularly the taste of the formulation and the drug substance it contains, is difficult. Whilst volunteer taste panels can be used to good effect their utility is limited, particularly during very early stage development when the toxicological profile of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is yet to be established in detail. A potentiometric “electronic tongue” has been applied to analyse a variety of 41 individual substances and mixtures of particular interest for pharmaceutical research and development. The electronic tongue (ET) was capable of discriminating between substances with different taste modalities and could also distinguish different substances eliciting the same basic taste; the ET is promising in terms of quantifying the content of each substance and has an ability to detect nuances of the basic taste (e.g. lingering or short-lived). After calibration the electronic tongue was successfully applied to predicting bitterness strength of binary mixtures with a sweetener in terms of “apparent” or “perceived” quinine content. In order to render a formulation palatable it is often necessary to mask the (usually bitter) taste of the API by the addition of masking agents such as sweeteners and flavours. The ET proved capable of distinguishing between formulations with different levels of sweetener and/or flavour in a manner that was consistent with their masking efficiency as perceived by a small human taste panel. A suitably calibrated ET could have the benefit of providing the pharmaceutical formulator with reliable data concerning the taste of the product quickly and with a reduced need to ask volunteers to taste active pharmaceutical samples. Early development activities could be facilitated when human tasting is usually not possible in the absence of the required toxicological data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vlasov Yu, Legin A, Rudnitskaya A (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 373:136–146
Toko K (1998) Meas Sci Technol 9:1919–1936
Indow T (1969) Percept Psychophysiol 5:347–351
Nikolsky BP (1937) Zurn Anal Chim 10:495
Eisenmann G, Rudin GO, Casb JU (1957) Science 126:831
Legin A, Rudnitskaya A, Seleznev B, Vlasov Yu (2000) In: Gardner JW, Persaud KC (eds) Electronic noses and olfaction 2000. Series in sensors (series ed Jones BE). IOP Publishing, Bristol, pp 13–20
Toko K (2000) Sens Actuators B 64:205–215
Rudnitskaya A, Legin A, Salles C, Mielle P (2001) In: Stetter JR, Penrose WR (eds) Artificial chemical sensing: olfaction and the electronic nose (ISOEN 2001), Sensor Division, vol 15. The Electrochemical Society USA, Proceedings
Takagi S, Toko K, Wada K, Yamada H, Toyoshima K (1998) J Pharm Sci 87:552–555
Tagaki S, Toko K, Wada K, Ohki T (2001) J Pharm Sci 90:2042–2048
Uchida T, Kobayashi Y, Miyanaga Y, Toukubo R, Ikezaki H, Taniguchi A, Matsuyama K (2001) Chem Pharm Bull 49:1336–1339
Miyanaga Y, Tanigake A, Nakamura T, Kobayashi Y, Ikezaki H, Taniguchi A, Matsuyama K, Uchida T (2002) Int J Pharm 248:207–218
Ito T, Radecka H, Tohda K, Odashima K, Umezawa Y (1998) J Am Chem Soc 120:3049–3059
Vlasov Yu, Legin A, Rudnitskaya A (1997) Sens Actuators B 44:532–537
Legin A, Rudnitskaya A, Smirnova A, Lvova L, Vlasov Yu (1999) J Appl Chem (Russian) 72:114–120
Legin A, Makarychev-Mikhailov S, Goryacheva O, Kirsanov D, Vlasov Yu (2002) Anal Chim Acta 457:297–303
Naes T, Martens H (1989) Multivariate calibration. Wiley, New York
Esbensen K (2001) Multivariate analysis in practice, Camo ASA
Electronic statistics textbook (2004) StatSoft, Tulsa, OK. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html
Barker M, Rayens W (2003) J Chemometrics 17:166–173
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Legin, A., Rudnitskaya, A., Clapham, D. et al. Electronic tongue for pharmaceutical analytics: quantification of tastes and masking effects. Anal Bioanal Chem 380, 36–45 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2738-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2738-3