Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Calcified Tissue International 5/2005

01.11.2005 | Clinical Investigations

Recommendations for Thresholds for Cortical Bone Geometry and Density Measurement by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography

verfasst von: K. A. Ward, J. E. Adams, T. N. Hangartner

Erschienen in: Calcified Tissue International | Ausgabe 5/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) is widely used for clinical and research purposes. For accurate determination of bone geometry (bone cross-sectional area, cortical thickness, and cortical area), volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and cortical bone mineral content (BMC), it is important to select the appropriate thresholds. A Stratec XCT-2000 scanner was used to compare current standard practice with new optimized thresholds. Currently, a single threshold of 710 mg/mL for the measurement of cortical vBMD and geometry is used. We hypothesised that this threshold may not be optimal and used the European Forearm Phantom (EFP) and patient data to test more appropriate thresholds. A single slice (1.2 mm width, 0.4 mm pixel size) was made at section 4 of the EFP (representing the diaphyseal portion of a long bone). The EFP has a known cortical thickness of 2.5 mm and, therefore, the correct threshold for geometry would be that which measures cortical thickness as 2.5 mm. Thresholds were altered at approximately the 50% value between soft tissue (60 mg/mL) and peak density (879 mg/mL), and cortical thickness versus threshold was plotted; the correct threshold for geometry was 460 mg/mL. By expressing this threshold as a percentage of the range of density values in the EFP ([460–60]/[879–60] = 49%) and then applying this percentage to in vivo data, the optimum threshold for geometry can be determined: ([1240−79] × 0.49) + 79 = 648 mg/mL. For cortical vBMD of in vivo bone measurements at the midshaft site of the radius, thresholds were varied around the peak value (1240 mg/mL), and the threshold was set to that which gave a cortical density of 1240 mg/mL; the threshold for cortical density was, therefore, 1200 mg/mL. A subset of radius scans from a population of young healthy females was analyzed using the new thresholds (648 mg/mL for bone geometry, 1200 mg/mL for cortical vBMD) versus the current threshold (710 mg/mL). For bone geometry, the mean difference between the analysis based on the new threshold and that based on the manufacturer-recommended threshold ranged between 2.1% and 14% (total area = 2.1%, cortical thickness = 14%, cortical area = 3.7%). Although there was a 10% difference between the analysis based on the new threshold and that based on the manufacturer-recommended threshold, this difference was not systematic. Thresholds will significantly affect results obtained from pQCT. The current threshold of 710 mg/mL is inadequate for accurate determination of bone geometry and cortical vBMD. New thresholds of 648 mg/mL for geometry and 1,200 mg/mL for cortical vBMD should be used.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider P, Reiners C (1998) Peripheral quantitative computed tomography. In: Genant H, Guglielmi G, Jergas M (eds). Bone densitometry and osteoporosis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp 349–363 Schneider P, Reiners C (1998) Peripheral quantitative computed tomography. In: Genant H, Guglielmi G, Jergas M (eds). Bone densitometry and osteoporosis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp 349–363
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wishart J, Horowitz M, Need A, Nordin BE (1990) Relationship between forearm and vertebral mineral density in postmenopausal women with primary hyperparathyroidism. Arch Intern Med 150:1329–1331PubMed Wishart J, Horowitz M, Need A, Nordin BE (1990) Relationship between forearm and vertebral mineral density in postmenopausal women with primary hyperparathyroidism. Arch Intern Med 150:1329–1331PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hangartner T, Gilsanz V (1996) Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 11:1518–1525PubMedCrossRef Hangartner T, Gilsanz V (1996) Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 11:1518–1525PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Prevhal S, Engelke K, Kalender W (1999) Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. Physics Med Biol 44:751–764 Prevhal S, Engelke K, Kalender W (1999) Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. Physics Med Biol 44:751–764
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Binkley T, Specker B (2000) pQCT measurement of bone parameters in young children—validation of technique. J Clin Densitom 3:9–14CrossRefPubMed Binkley T, Specker B (2000) pQCT measurement of bone parameters in young children—validation of technique. J Clin Densitom 3:9–14CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruegsegger P, Kalender W (1993) A phantom for standardization and quality control in peripheral bone measurements by pQCT and DXA. Phys Med Biol 38:1963–1970CrossRef Ruegsegger P, Kalender W (1993) A phantom for standardization and quality control in peripheral bone measurements by pQCT and DXA. Phys Med Biol 38:1963–1970CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet Vol: 307–310 Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet Vol: 307–310
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kibe L, Zemel BS, Leonard MB (2004) Assessment of cortical bone mineral density by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in children: impact of partial volume effects. J Bone Miner Res 19 (Suppl 1): S230 Kibe L, Zemel BS, Leonard MB (2004) Assessment of cortical bone mineral density by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in children: impact of partial volume effects. J Bone Miner Res 19 (Suppl 1): S230
Metadaten
Titel
Recommendations for Thresholds for Cortical Bone Geometry and Density Measurement by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography
verfasst von
K. A. Ward
J. E. Adams
T. N. Hangartner
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2005
Erschienen in
Calcified Tissue International / Ausgabe 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0171-967X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0827
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-005-0031-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2005

Calcified Tissue International 5/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.