Skip to main content
Log in

To what extent does the indicator “concurrent use of three or more psychotropic drugs” capture use of potentially inappropriate psychotropics among the elderly?

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The indicator “concurrent use of three or more psychotropic drugs” has been used as a measure of quality in drug use among the elderly. The aim of our study was to assess to what extent the indicator captures the use of specific psychotropics associated with an increased risk of adverse events among the elderly, i.e., potentially inappropriate psychotropic drugs (PIP).

Methods

All individuals aged 75 years and older in Sweden purchasing prescribed psychotropic drugs in 2006 constituted the study population (n = 384,904). Data on purchased psychotropic drugs from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register were used. The overlap between individuals with the indicator and individuals using PIP was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratio as outcome measures.

Results

Among the psychotropic drug users, 15% had the indicator and 39% used PIP. The proportion of individuals with the indicator among all individuals using PIP was 27% (sensitivity). The proportion of individuals without the indicator among all individuals not using PIP was 93% (specificity). The positive predictive value was 72%, and the negative predictive value was 67%. Differences in outcome measures were observed between different categories of PIP.

Conclusions

The indicator “concurrent use of three or more psychotropics” can be technically easy to use, but PIP is more specific. Three quarters of all individuals who used PIP in this study were not captured by the indicator. However, two thirds of all individuals with the indicator used PIP. When selecting instruments to assess appropriateness in drug therapy in the elderly, clinical relevance should be balanced against convenience of use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shi S, Morike K, Klotz U (2008) The clinical implications of ageing for rational drug therapy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 64:183–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Report of a working group prepared for the Director of Research and Development of the NHS Management Executive (1993) What do we mean by appropriate health care? Qual Health Care 2:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spinewine A, Schmader KE, Barber N et al (2007) Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet 370:173–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beers MH (1997) Explicit criteria for determining potentially inappropriate medication use by the elderly. An update. Arch Intern Med 157:1531–1536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE et al (2003) Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: results of a US consensus panel of experts. Arch Intern Med 163:2716–2724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McLeod PJ, Huang AR, Tamblyn RM et al (1997) Defining inappropriate practices in prescribing for elderly people: a national consensus panel. Can Med Assoc J 156:385–391

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Naugler CT, Brymer C, Stolee P et al (2000) Development and validation of an improving prescribing in the elderly tool. Can J Clin Pharmacol 7:103–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Laroche ML, Charmes JP, Merle L (2007) Potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly: a French consensus panel list. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 63:725–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brekke M, Rognstad S, Straand J et al (2008) Pharmacologically inappropriate prescriptions for elderly patients in general practice: How common? Baseline data from The Prescription Peer Academic Detailing (Rx-PAD) study. Scand J Prim Health Care 26:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Basger BJ, Chen TF, Moles RJ (2008) Inappropriate medication use and prescribing indicators in elderly Australians: development of a prescribing indicators tool. Drugs Aging 25:777–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fialova D, Topinkova E, Gambassi G et al (2005) Potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly home care patients in Europe. JAMA 293:1348–1358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoven JL, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Vander Stichele RH (2005) Indicators of prescribing quality in drug utilisation research: report of a European meeting (DURQUIM). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 60:831–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen M (2006) Is it possible to measure prescribing quality using only prescription data? Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 98:314–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wettermark B, Tomson G, Bergman U (2006) Quality indicators for drug utilization—new European recommendations (in Swedish). Lakartidningen 103:3469–3472

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A et al (2003) Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Br Med J 326:816–819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Robertson HA, MacKinnon NJ (2002) Development of a list of consensus-approved clinical indicators of preventable drug-related morbidity in older adults. Clin Ther 24:1595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. National Board of Health and Welfare (2003) Indicators for evaluation of the quality in drug use among the eldery: proposal from the National Board of Health and Welfare (in Swedish). Report number 2003-110-20. National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm

  18. Ruths S (2008) Evaluation of prescribing quality in nursing homes based on drug-specific indicators: The Bergen district nursing home (BEDNURS) study. Nor J Epidemiol 18:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Linden M, Bar T, Helmchen H (2004) Prevalence and appropriateness of psychotropic drug use in old age: results from the Berlin Aging Study (BASE). In. Psychogeriatr 16:461–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Draper B, Brodaty H, Low LF et al (2001) Use of psychotropics in Sydney nursing homes: associations with depression, psychosis, and behavioral disturbances. Int Psychogeriatr 13:107–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Giron MS, Forsell Y, Bernsten C et al (2001) Psychotropic drug use in elderly people with and without dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 16:900–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Klarin I, Wimo A, Fastbom J (2005) The association of inappropriate drug use with hospitalisation and mortality - a population-based study of the very old. Drugs Aging 22:69–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnell K, Fastbom J, Rosen M et al (2007) Inappropriate drug use in the elderly: a nationwide register-based study. Ann Pharmacother 41:1243–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Association of Local Authorities and Regions and The National Board of Health and Welfare (2008) Quality and efficiency in Swedish health care—regional comparisons 2007. Stockholm, Sweden.

  25. National Association of State Mental Health Report Program Directors (2001) Technical report on psychiatric polypharmacy. Medical Directors Council and State Medicaid Directors, Alexandria

  26. World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics. Methodology ATC index with DDDs. WHOCC, Oslo. Available at: www.whocc.no

  27. Wettermark B, Hammar N, Fored CM et al (2007) The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register—opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16:726–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Statistics Sweden (2008) The statistical database (Statistikdatabasen). Available at: http://www.ssd.scb.se/. Accessed 17 June 2008

  29. Johnell K, Fastbom J (2008) Multi-dose drug dispensing and inappropriate drug use: a nationwide register-based study of over 700,000 elderly. Scand. J Prim Health Care 26:86–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jano E, Aparasu RR (2007) Healthcare outcomes associated with Beers’ criteria: a systematic review. Ann Pharmacother 41:438–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chutka DS, Takahashi PY, Hoel RW (2004) Inappropriate medications for elderly patients. Mayo Clin Proc 79:122–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson K, Mottram P (2004) A comparison of side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in older depressed patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 19:754–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of a larger project on quality indicators that has received funding from the county council in Region Västra Götaland. The project was designed by the researchers at the Nordic School of Public Health. The authors would like to thank the responsible persons at Dosapoteket in Gothenburg for providing access to the database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Lesén.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lesén, E., Petzold, M., Andersson, K. et al. To what extent does the indicator “concurrent use of three or more psychotropic drugs” capture use of potentially inappropriate psychotropics among the elderly?. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 65, 635–642 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0623-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0623-x

Keywords

Navigation