Abstract
Background
The interest in adaptive study design is evident from the growing amount of clinical research employing this model in the mid to later stages of medicines development. Little has been published on the practical application and merits of adaptive study design in early phase clinical research.
Methods
This paper describes a retrospective analysis performed on a sample of 29 industry lead adaptive early phase studies commencing between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2010 in a clinical trials unit in London, England. All studies containing at least one adaptive feature in the original protocol were included in the analysis. The scope of the analysis was to assess whether the use of adaptive study designs provided tangible benefits over the use of conventional study designs using time savings as the main measure.
Conclusion
We conclude that the use of adaptive study design saves time in early phase research programs. This is achieved by abolishing the need for substantial amendments or by mitigating their impact on timelines and by using adaptive scheduling efficiencies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gallo P, Chuang-Stein C, Dragalin V, Gaydos B, Krams M, Pinheiro J (2006) Adaptive designs in clinical drug development—an executive summary of the PhRMA working group. J Biopharm Stat 16:275–283. http://www.gemini-grp.com/Bayes/PhRMA.pdf
Rogatko A, Schoeneck D, Jonas W, Tighiouart M, Khuri FR, Porter A (2007) Translation of innovative designs into phase 1 trials. J Clin Oncol 25:4982–4986
Gehan EA (1961) The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. J Chronic Dis 13:346–353
EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (2007) Reflection paper on methodological issues in confirmatory clinical trials planned with an adaptive design. CHMP/EWP/2459/02. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003616.pdf
EMA (2009) EMA/EFPIA 2nd workshop, adaptive design in confirmatory trials. EMA/779520/2009. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Minutes/2010/04/WC500089206.pdf
FDA (2010) Guidance for industry; adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm201790.pdf
De Ridder F (2011) Adaptive designs in early development; oral presentation. 10th Congress of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, June 2011, Budapest
European Commission (2010) Communication from the commission—detailed guidance on the request to the competent authorities for authorisation of a clinical trial on a medicinal product for human use, the notification of substantial amendments and the declaration of the end of the trial. OJC 82:1–19
The MHRA website: amendments to your clinical trial authorisation: additional information. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Howweregulate/Medicines/Licensingofmedicines/Clinicaltrials/ManagingyourCTA/Amendments/Additionalinformation/index.htm
Declaration of interest
The authors are employed by Richmond Pharmacology Ltd, a specialist contract research organisation conducting early phase clinical research, based in London, England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lorch, U., Berelowitz, K., Ozen, C. et al. The practical application of adaptive study design in early phase clinical trials: a retrospective analysis of time savings. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 68, 543–551 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-011-1176-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-011-1176-3