Skip to main content
Log in

Trials, Regulation and tribulations

  • Point of View
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Regulation EU 536/2014 EU introduces a separation between two parts (technical-scientific aspects and locally relevant ethical aspects) in the assessment of applications for approval of trials and provides for each ‘Member State concerned’ to arrive at ‘one single decision’ regarding the application for authorisation to conduct a trial.

Proposals

The Regulation should be implemented in such a way as to avoid a separation between scientific assessment and ethical assessment; guarantee the absence of conflicts of interest in the institutions responsible for decision-making; promote efficiency on the part of ethics committees. In particular, (i) it is not appropriate to assess Parts I and II of the application for approval to conduct a trial separately (scientific soundness is the principal requisite for ethical soundness); (ii) conflicts of interest should be avoided, especially as regards links with the national authority responsible for drugs regulation; (iii) decision-making in each state should be the responsibility of a single coordinating ethics committee divided into sections specialising in different therapeutic fields; (iv) local committees affiliated to institutions where trial participants are recruited should be able to interact with the coordinating committee, provide consultation services—including on issues of clinical ethics—and promote training in the field of biomedical ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Parliament, Council of the European Union (2014) Regulation (EU) 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC. Off J Eur Union L158:1–76

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Medical Association (1964-2013) Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/. Accessed 11 November 2015

  3. Council of Europe (1997) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/html/164.htm. Accessed 11 November 2015

  4. Wendler D, Grady C (2000) What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283:2701–2711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Larcher V, Slowther AM, Watson AR, on behalf of the UK Clinical Ethics Network (2010) Core competencies for clinical ethics committees. Clin Med 10:30–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization (2015) WHO statement on public disclosure of clinical trial results. http://www.who.int/entity/ictrp/results/WHO_Statement_results_reporting_clinical_trials.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 11 November 2015

Download references

Authors’ contributions

The authors contributed equally.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Petrini.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petrini, C., Garattini, S. Trials, Regulation and tribulations. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 72, 503–505 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-016-2009-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-016-2009-1

Navigation