Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Urolithiasis 5/2016

24.12.2015 | Original Paper

Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly

verfasst von: Henglong Hu, Yuchao Lu, Deng He, Lei Cui, Jiaqiao Zhang, Zhenyu Zhao, Baolong Qin, Yufeng Wang, Feng Lin, Shaogang Wang

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) for the treatment of renal and/or proximal ureteral stones sized 1–2 cm in the elderly (≥60 years). Between January 2010 and March 2015, 184 consecutive mPNL and fURS were performed to treat intermediate renal and/or proximal ureteral stones in geriatric patients. The records were retrospectively reviewed and outcomes were compared. Although no significant difference was found in the complication rate between two groups, a statistical trend (p = 0.059) in favor of fURS was observed. In addition, multivariate analysis demonstrated that mPNL, preoperative positive urine culture and lower hemoglobin were independent risk factors for postoperative complication (p = 0.016, p = 0.021, p = 0.001, respectively). And fURS was significantly associated with less hemoglobin drop, red blood cell transfusion, analgesics requirement, postoperative hospital duration, and charges of laboratory tests, medical examinations and medications (p = 0.019, p = 0.037, p = 0.006, p = 0.000 and p = 0.007, p = 0.000, p = 0.000, p = 0.001, respectively), while higher costs of operations (p = 0.008). Receiver operating characteristic curve suggested a preoperative hemoglobin of 106.5 g/L as the threshold for predicting red blood cell transfusion after mPNL. The overall one-session stone-free rate of fURS at 1 month was lower (p = 0.006), while it was similar for solitary stone between two groups. Comorbidity and previous stone surgery did not affect postoperative complication and stone-free rate. This study shows that mPNL is more effective for multiple stones, but fURS is associated with potentially less complications and postoperative hospital stay. Furthermore, preoperative hemoglobin level and urine culture can be used to predict postoperative complication risk and they may be helpful in choosing treatment methods for the elderly.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy JP, Skinner TA, Norman RW (2011) Urolithiasis in the elderly. Can J Urol 18(3):5717–5720PubMed McCarthy JP, Skinner TA, Norman RW (2011) Urolithiasis in the elderly. Can J Urol 18(3):5717–5720PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghani KR, Sammon JD, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Bhojani N, Sukumar S, Peabody JO, Menon M, Trinh QD (2013) Trends in surgery for upper urinary tract calculi in the USA using the nationwide inpatient sample: 1999–2009. BJU Int 112(2):224–230. doi:10.1111/bju.12059 CrossRefPubMed Ghani KR, Sammon JD, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Bhojani N, Sukumar S, Peabody JO, Menon M, Trinh QD (2013) Trends in surgery for upper urinary tract calculi in the USA using the nationwide inpatient sample: 1999–2009. BJU Int 112(2):224–230. doi:10.​1111/​bju.​12059 CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gentle DL, Stoller ML, Bruce JE, Leslie SW (1997) Geriatric urolithiasis. J Urol 158(6):2221–2224CrossRefPubMed Gentle DL, Stoller ML, Bruce JE, Leslie SW (1997) Geriatric urolithiasis. J Urol 158(6):2221–2224CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchini GS, Mello MF, Levy R, Vicentini FC, Torricelli FC, Eluf-Neto J, Mazzucchi E, Srougi M (2015) Contemporary trends of inpatient surgical management of stone disease: national analysis in an economic growth scenario. J Endourol. doi:10.1089/end.2015.0021 Marchini GS, Mello MF, Levy R, Vicentini FC, Torricelli FC, Eluf-Neto J, Mazzucchi E, Srougi M (2015) Contemporary trends of inpatient surgical management of stone disease: national analysis in an economic growth scenario. J Endourol. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2015.​0021
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, Sarilar O, Muslumanoglu AY (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53(1):184–190. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049 CrossRefPubMed Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, Sarilar O, Muslumanoglu AY (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53(1):184–190. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2007.​06.​049 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, Wolf JS Jr, Grabe M, Gravas S, Group CPS (2012) Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62(2):246–255. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.055 CrossRefPubMed de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, Wolf JS Jr, Grabe M, Gravas S, Group CPS (2012) Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62(2):246–255. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2012.​03.​055 CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Herrmann TR, Walcher U, Abdelhafez MF, Nicklas AP, Holzle L, Schilling D, Bedke J, Stenzl A, Nagele U (2013) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol 31(6):1555–1561. doi:10.1007/s00345-012-0962-6 CrossRefPubMed Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Herrmann TR, Walcher U, Abdelhafez MF, Nicklas AP, Holzle L, Schilling D, Bedke J, Stenzl A, Nagele U (2013) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol 31(6):1555–1561. doi:10.​1007/​s00345-012-0962-6 CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R, Torricelli FC, Di Palma C, Molina WR, Monga M, De Sio M (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(1):125–137. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003 CrossRefPubMed De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R, Torricelli FC, Di Palma C, Molina WR, Monga M, De Sio M (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(1):125–137. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2014.​07.​003 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Akman T, Binbay M, Ugurlu M, Kaba M, Akcay M, Yazici O, Ozgor F, Muslumanoglu AY (2012) Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis. J Endourol 26(6):625–629. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0526 CrossRefPubMed Akman T, Binbay M, Ugurlu M, Kaba M, Akcay M, Yazici O, Ozgor F, Muslumanoglu AY (2012) Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis. J Endourol 26(6):625–629. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2011.​0526 CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H (2013) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis 41(3):241–246. doi:10.1007/s00240-013-0552-0 CrossRefPubMed Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H (2013) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis 41(3):241–246. doi:10.​1007/​s00240-013-0552-0 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Resorlu B, Unsal A, Tepeler A, Atis G, Tokatli Z, Oztuna D, Armagan A, Gurbuz C, Caskurlu T, Saglam R (2012) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis. Urology 80(3):519–523. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.018 CrossRefPubMed Resorlu B, Unsal A, Tepeler A, Atis G, Tokatli Z, Oztuna D, Armagan A, Gurbuz C, Caskurlu T, Saglam R (2012) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis. Urology 80(3):519–523. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2012.​04.​018 CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Yu CF, Jin SH, Zhu H, Na YQ (2014) A prospective comparative study between minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position and flexible ureteroscopy in the management of single large stone in the proximal ureter. Urology 83(5):999–1002. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.11.034 CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y, Yu CF, Jin SH, Zhu H, Na YQ (2014) A prospective comparative study between minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position and flexible ureteroscopy in the management of single large stone in the proximal ureter. Urology 83(5):999–1002. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2013.​11.​034 CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan J, Chen Q, Xue W, Chen Y, Xia L, Chen H, Huang Y (2013) RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2–3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting. Urolithiasis 41(1):73–78. doi:10.1007/s00240-012-0533-8 CrossRefPubMed Pan J, Chen Q, Xue W, Chen Y, Xia L, Chen H, Huang Y (2013) RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2–3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting. Urolithiasis 41(1):73–78. doi:10.​1007/​s00240-012-0533-8 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly
verfasst von
Henglong Hu
Yuchao Lu
Deng He
Lei Cui
Jiaqiao Zhang
Zhenyu Zhao
Baolong Qin
Yufeng Wang
Feng Lin
Shaogang Wang
Publikationsdatum
24.12.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0854-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Urolithiasis 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.