nach oben

Pediatric Radiology

Erschienen in:

01.12.2008 | Review

Soft-copy display and reading: what the radiologist should know in the digital era

verfasst von: Erich Sorantin

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The basic scheme of modern medical imaging consists of the following steps: (1) data acquisition, (2) data (image) processing, (3) further data processing by the computer graphic system, (4) image display, and finally (5) visual perception and interpretation. Medical monitors represent a forgotten part of the whole chain. The purpose of this review is to present the key facts about the display technologies used today, as well as their characterization and quality assurance.

Sorantin E, Coradello H, Wiltgen M (1992) Computer-assisted mechanical ventilation of newborn infants. Anaesthesist 41:342–345PubMed

Adobe (2008) Adobe PostScript language specifications. http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/ps/index_specs.html. Accessed 8 May 2008

Samei E (2005) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays. Radiographics 25:491–501PubMedCrossRef

American College of Radiology (2008) Practice guideline for digital radiography. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/dx/digital_radiography.aspx. Accessed 8 May 2008

Groth DS, Bernatz SN, Fetterly KA et al (2001) Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays. Radiographics 21:719–732PubMed

American College of Radiology (2007) ACR technical standard for digital image data management. http://www.aspb.ro/documente/protocoaleclinice/Radiologie/ACR_Technical_Standard_for_Digital_Image_Data_Management.PDF. Accessed 8 May 2008

Huppelsberg J, Walter K (2005) Kurzlehrbuch physiologie, 2nd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 255–256

Wikipedia (2008) Weber–Fechner law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weber%E2%80%93Fechner_law. Accessed 8 May 2008

Wikipedia (2008) Stevens’ power law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevens%27_power_law. Accessed 8 May 2008

10.

National Electrical Manufacturers Association (2004) Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM). Part 14: grayscale standard display function. http://medical.nema.org/dicom/2004/04_14PU.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2008

11.

Matthijs P (2003) Barco white paper. Grayscale resolution: how much is enough? http://www.barco.com/barcoview/downloads/GrayscaleResolution.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2008

12.

Deutsches Institut für Normung eV – NA 080 Radiology Standards Committee (2001-2) DIN V 6868-57. Image quality assurance in diagnostic Xray departments – Part 57: Acceptance testing for image display devices. http://www.nar.din.de/cmd?level=tpl-art-detailansicht&committeeid=54739011&subcommitteeid=54779128&artid=23612044&bcrumblevel=2&languageid=en. Accessed 8 May 2008

13.

Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D et al (2005) Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. Med Phys 32:1205–1225PubMedCrossRef

14.

Deroo D (2003) Barco white paper. Why is softcopy QA important? http://www.barco.com/barcoview/downloads/Why_is_Softcopy_QA_important.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2008

15.

BrighamRAD design team (1997) Video monitor test pattern tutorials. http://brighamrad.harvard.edu/research/topics/vispercep/tutorial.html. Accessed 8 May 2008

16.

Aldrich JE, Rutledge JD (2005) Assessment of PACS display systems. J Digit Imaging 18:287–295PubMedCrossRef

17.

Heise (2007) http://www.heise.de/. Accessed 8 May 2008

18.

Sun Microsystems (2007) Java. http://www.java.com/. Accessed 8 May 2008

19.

Braunschweig R, Klose HJ, Neugebauer E et al (1997) Digital radiography. Results of a survey (part A) and a consensus conference (part B). Eur Radiol 7:94–101PubMedCrossRef

20.

American College of Radiology (2006) ACR technical standard for teleradiology. http://www.acr.org/Hidden/Economics/FeaturedCategories/mps/medicare_info/teleradiology/ACRTechnicalStandardsDoc4.aspx Accessed 8 May 2008

21.

Balassy C, Prokop M, Weber M et al (2005) Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study. AJR 184:752–756PubMed

22.

Fukushima H, Ikeda M, Ishigaki T et al (2007) Influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for detection of diffuse pulmonary disease on chest radiographs. Radiat Med 25:211–217PubMedCrossRef

23.

Oschatz E, Prokop M, Scharitzer M et al (2005) Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions. Eur Radiol 15:1472–1476PubMedCrossRef

24.

Park CM, Lee HJ, Goo JM et al (2008) Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors. Eur J Radiol 66:13–18PubMedCrossRef

25.

Scharitzer M, Prokop M, Weber M et al (2005) Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode ray tube monitors. Radiology 234:611–616PubMedCrossRef

26.

Usami H, Ikeda M, Ishigaki T et al (2006) The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs. Eur Radiol 16:726–732PubMedCrossRef

27.

Austrian Standards Institute (2008) http://www.on-norm.at/publish/3070.html. Accessed 9 May 2008

28.

Carrein G (2003) Barco white paper. Characteristics of CRT and LCD displays. http://www.barco.com/barcoview/downloads/Characteristics_of_CRT_and_LCD_displays.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2008

29.

Wikipedia (2007) Cathode ray tube. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathode_ray_tube. Accessed 8 May 2008

30.

Wikipedia (2007) Liquid crystal display. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lcd#Inplane_switching_.28IPS.29. Accessed 8 May 2008

Titel: Soft-copy display and reading: what the radiologist should know in the digital era
verfasst von: Erich Sorantin
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2008
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0898-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

08.04.2024 | Andrologie | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Soft-copy display and reading: what the radiologist should know in the digital era

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Quantitative Angiografie könnte IVUS-Alternative darstellen

Die Ganz-Genom-Sequenzierung startet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2008

Radiological features of ingested metallic mesh earphone pieces

Pediatric Radiology Continuing Medical Education Activity

The vital reviewer

Hermes

‘Face of the giant panda’ sign in Wilson disease

The use of bone age for bone mineral density interpretation in a cohort of pediatric brain tumor patients

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Quantitative Angiografie könnte IVUS-Alternative darstellen

Die Ganz-Genom-Sequenzierung startet

Update Radiologie