Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of compliance with MRI procedures among children of ages 3 years to 12 years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A number of children are unable to comply with an MRI procedure and require general anesthetic. However, we lack information about which factors are associated with MRI compliance in young children.

Objective

To determine the strongest predictors of MRI compliance, focusing on variables that can be easily rated by patients’ parents.

Materials and methods

A sample of 205 children ages 3–11 years (mean age 6.6 years) who were at risk of non-compliance were recruited from a children’s hospital. Their parents completed a behavior assessment scale for children as well as a questionnaire that assessed their expectations of compliance and perception of their child’s typical medical compliance. The children subsequently completed a mock MRI with an educational play therapist and a clinical MRI, with the quality of the scan scored by the MRI technologist.

Results

Overall, 88.3% of children complied with the clinical scan and achieved diagnostic images, with age unrelated to compliance in this well-prepared patient group. The strongest predictors of MRI compliance were parental expectations and ratings of how well the child typically copes with medical procedures. Non-compliance was related to child attention problems and to poor adaptability among children. A total of 64 preschool-age children (91.4%) and 110 school-age children (95.7%) were correctly classified as compliant or non-compliant based on these predictor variables.

Conclusion

A child’s temperament, medical experiences and parental expectations provide important information in predicting which children successfully comply with an MRI procedure and which require general anesthesia. Further study is needed to explore the utility of these variables in predicting compliance at sites that do not have access to an MRI simulator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marshall SP, Smith MS, Weinberger E (1995) Perceived anxiety of pediatric patients to magnetic resonance. Clin Pediatr 34:59–60

  2. Tyc VL, Fairclough D, Fletcher B et al (1995) Children’s distress during magnetic resonance imaging procedures. Child Health Care 24:5–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallowell LM, Stewart SE, de Amorim E et al (2007) Reviewing the process of preparing children for MRI. Pediatr Radiol 38:271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murat I, Constant I, Maud’huy H (2004) Perioperative anaesthetic morbidity in children: a database of 24,165 anaesthetics over a 30-month period. Paediatr Anaesth 14:158–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Amorim E, Silva CJT, Mackenzie A et al (2006) Practice MRI: reducing the need for sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI. Australas Radiol 50:319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carter AJ, Greer M-LC, Gray SE et al (2010) Mock MRI: reducing the need for anaesthesia in children. Pediatr Radiol 40:1368–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson AJ, Shrivastava PP, Jamsen K et al (2006) Risk factors for anxiety at induction of anesthesia in children: a prospective cohort study. Pediatr Anesth 16:919–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caldwell-Andrews AA et al (2006) Predicting which children benefit most from parental presence during induction of anesthesia. Pediatr Anesth 16:627–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klosky JL, Tyc VL, Tong X et al (2007) Predicting pediatric distress during radiation therapy procedures: the role of medical, psychosocial, and demographic factors. Pediatrics 119:e1159–e1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fielding D, Duff A (1999) Compliance with treatment protocols: interventions for children with chronic illness. Arch Dis Child 80:196–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bijttebier P, Vertommen H (1998) The impact of previous experience on children’s reactions to venepunctures. J Health Psychol 3:39–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Proczkowska-Björklund M, Svedin CG (2004) Child related background factors affecting compliance with induction of anaesthesia. Pediatr Anesth 14:225–234

  13. Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ (2011) Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol 41:1353–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW (2004) Behavior assessment system for children second edition manual. Pearson, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996) Using multivariate statistics, 3rd edn. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Comrey AL, Lee HB (1992) A first course in factor analysis, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pressdee D, May L, Eastman E et al (1997) The use of play therapy in the preparation of children undergoing MR imaging. Clin Radiol 52:945–947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenberg DR, Sweeney JA, Gillen JS et al (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging of children without sedation: preparation with simulation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:853–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Epstein JN, Casey BJ, Tonev ST et al (2007) Assessment and prevention of head motion during imaging of patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 155:75–82

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. De Bie HMA, Boersma M, Wattjes MP et al (2010) Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans. Eur J Pediatr 169:1079–1085

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Professor Michael Ditchfield for facilitating this project in the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, the educational play therapists and MRI technicians for their assistance in recruiting participants and collecting data, and Melanie Kiehne for data entry. The authors are grateful to the patients and their families who took part in this study.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn D. Cahoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cahoon, G.D., Davison, T.E. Prediction of compliance with MRI procedures among children of ages 3 years to 12 years. Pediatr Radiol 44, 1302–1309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2996-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2996-y

Keywords

Navigation