Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 6/2006

01.06.2006 | Newer Technology

Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size

verfasst von: Jesse A. Davila, Mark J. Kransdorf, Gavan P. Duffy

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a computer-assisted templating in the surgical planning of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty utilizing EndoMap software (Siemans AG, Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Endomap Software is an electronic program that uses DICOM images to analyze standard anteroposterior radiographs for determination of optimal prosthesis component size.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative radiographs of 36 patients undergoing uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty, utilizing EndoMap software, Version VA20. DICOM anteroposterior radiographs were analyzed using standard manufacturer supplied electronic templates to determine acetabular and femoral component sizes. No additional clinical information was reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component sizes were assessed by an orthopedic surgeon and two radiologists. Mean and estimated component size was compared with component size as documented in operative reports.

Results

The mean estimated acetabular component size was 53 mm (range 48–60 mm), 1 mm larger than the mean implanted size of 52 mm (range 48–62 mm). Thirty-one of 36 acetabular component sizes (86%) were accurate within one size. The mean calculated femoral component size was 4 (range 2–7), 1 size smaller than the actual mean component size of 5 (range 2–9). Twenty-six of 36 femoral component sizes (72%) were accurate within one size, and accurate within two sizes in all but four cases (94%).

Conclusion

EndoMap Software predicted femoral component size well, with 72% within one component size of that used, and 94% within two sizes. Acetabular component size was predicted slightly better with 86% within one component size and 94% within two component sizes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattern CW, King BF Jr, Hangiandreou NJ, et. al Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaroung times. J Digit Imaging 1999;12:155–159CrossRef Mattern CW, King BF Jr, Hangiandreou NJ, et. al Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaroung times. J Digit Imaging 1999;12:155–159CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Della Valle AG, Padgett DE, Salvati EA. Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13:455–462CrossRef Della Valle AG, Padgett DE, Salvati EA. Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13:455–462CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Della Valle AG, Slullitel G, Piccaluga F, Salvati EA. The Precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:51–58CrossRef Della Valle AG, Slullitel G, Piccaluga F, Salvati EA. The Precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:51–58CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertram T, Diercks LR, Van Ooijen MAP, Van Horn RJ. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthopaedica 2005;76:78–84CrossRef Bertram T, Diercks LR, Van Ooijen MAP, Van Horn RJ. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthopaedica 2005;76:78–84CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller EM. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:382–390CrossRef Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller EM. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:382–390CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller M. Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992;274:12–21 Muller M. Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992;274:12–21
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Babisch J, Layher F, Venbrocks RA., Rose I. Biomechanically based surgical planning with the help of the endoMap software module. Electromedica 2002;70 no.1 suppl.:9–15 Babisch J, Layher F, Venbrocks RA., Rose I. Biomechanically based surgical planning with the help of the endoMap software module. Electromedica 2002;70 no.1 suppl.:9–15
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Flagle C, Hooper FJ, Cox RE, Scanlon M. Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services. Radiology 2000;215:163–167CrossRef Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Flagle C, Hooper FJ, Cox RE, Scanlon M. Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services. Radiology 2000;215:163–167CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Knight JL, Atwater RD. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty 1992;7 Suppl:403–409CrossRef Knight JL, Atwater RD. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty 1992;7 Suppl:403–409CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Carter LW, Stovall DO, Young TR. Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral protheses. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:507–513CrossRef Carter LW, Stovall DO, Young TR. Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral protheses. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:507–513CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bono VJ. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:118–122CrossRef Bono VJ. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:118–122CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lattanzi R, Viceconti M, Zannoni C, Quadrani P, Toni A. Hip-Op: an innovative software to plan total hip replacement surgery. Med Inform 2002;27:71–83 Lattanzi R, Viceconti M, Zannoni C, Quadrani P, Toni A. Hip-Op: an innovative software to plan total hip replacement surgery. Med Inform 2002;27:71–83
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size
verfasst von
Jesse A. Davila
Mark J. Kransdorf
Gavan P. Duffy
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2006
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0106-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2006

Skeletal Radiology 6/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Browser’s Notes

Browser’s Notes

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.