Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 5/2013

01.05.2013 | Scientific Article

MRI characteristics of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma: retrospective comparison with histology and MDM2 gene amplification

verfasst von: Mélanie Brisson, Takeshi Kashima, David Delaney, Roberto Tirabosco, Andrew Clarke, Suzie Cro, Adrienne M. Flanagan, Paul O’Donnell

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To review the reliability of MR imaging features for the purpose of distinguishing lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL).

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of 87 patients with histologically proven lipomatous tumors was performed. All underwent MR imaging, assessing lipomatous content, septation, and nodules. The associations between these features and tumor diagnosis based on morphology and the presence or absence of MDM2 amplification were explored. The age of the patient and the size and location of the lesion were also recorded for statistical analysis.

Results

Of the 87 patients, 54 were classified as lipomas and 33 as ALT/WDL. MR identified ALT/WDL with a sensitivity of 90.9 % (CI 74.5–97.6) and a specificity of 37.0 % (CI 24.6–51.3). The positive and negative predictive values were 46.9 % (CI 34.5–59.7) and 86.9 % (CI 65.3–96.6), respectively. The mean age of patients with ALT/WDL was greater (60 years [range 40–83 years]) than those with lipoma (52 years [range 10–79 years]) (p = 0.025). The mean size of ALT/WDL (18.7 cm [range 5–36 cm]) was significantly greater than lipoma (13.9 cm [range 3–32 cm]) (p = 0.003). Features that increased the likelihood of ALT/WDL included: patient age over 60 years, maximal lesion dimension over 10 cm, location in lower limb, and presence of non-fatty areas, by a factor of 2.61–6.25 times.

Conclusions

ALT/WDL and lipoma have overlapping MR imaging characteristics. The most reliable imaging discriminators of ALT/WDL were size of lesion and lipomatous content, but due to the overlap in the MRI appearances of lipoma and ALT/WDL, discrimination should be based on molecular pathology rather than imaging.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dei Tos AP. Liposarcoma: new entities and evolving concepts. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000;4(4):252–66.PubMedCrossRef Dei Tos AP. Liposarcoma: new entities and evolving concepts. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000;4(4):252–66.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002. Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Coindre JM, Pedeutour F, Aurias A. Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Virchows Arch. 2009 Aug 18. Coindre JM, Pedeutour F, Aurias A. Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Virchows Arch. 2009 Aug 18.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Fanburg-Smith J. From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of musculoskeletal liposarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2005;25(5):1371–95.PubMedCrossRef Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Fanburg-Smith J. From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of musculoskeletal liposarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2005;25(5):1371–95.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans HL. Atypical lipomatous tumor, its variants, and its combined forms: a study of 61 cases, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(1):1–14.PubMedCrossRef Evans HL. Atypical lipomatous tumor, its variants, and its combined forms: a study of 61 cases, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(1):1–14.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimada S, Ishizawa T, Ishizawa K, Matsumura T, Hasegawa T, Hirose T. The value of MDM2 and CDK4 amplification levels using real-time polymerase chain reaction for the differential diagnosis of liposarcomas and their histologic mimickers. Hum Pathol. 2006;37(9):1123–9.PubMedCrossRef Shimada S, Ishizawa T, Ishizawa K, Matsumura T, Hasegawa T, Hirose T. The value of MDM2 and CDK4 amplification levels using real-time polymerase chain reaction for the differential diagnosis of liposarcomas and their histologic mimickers. Hum Pathol. 2006;37(9):1123–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hostein I, Pelmus M, Aurias A, Pedeutour F, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Coindre JM. Evaluation of MDM2 and CDK4 amplification by real-time PCR on paraffin wax-embedded material: a potential tool for the diagnosis of atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas. J Pathol. 2004;202(1):95–102.PubMedCrossRef Hostein I, Pelmus M, Aurias A, Pedeutour F, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Coindre JM. Evaluation of MDM2 and CDK4 amplification by real-time PCR on paraffin wax-embedded material: a potential tool for the diagnosis of atypical lipomatous tumours/well-differentiated liposarcomas. J Pathol. 2004;202(1):95–102.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sirvent N, Coindre JM, Maire G, Hostein I, Keslair F, Guillou L, et al. Detection of MDM2-CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 200 paraffin-embedded tumor samples: utility in diagnosing adipocytic lesions and comparison with immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(10):1476–89.PubMedCrossRef Sirvent N, Coindre JM, Maire G, Hostein I, Keslair F, Guillou L, et al. Detection of MDM2-CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 200 paraffin-embedded tumor samples: utility in diagnosing adipocytic lesions and comparison with immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(10):1476–89.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Binh MB, Sastre-Garau X, Guillou L, de Pinieux G, Terrier P, Lagace R, et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes: a comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(10):1340–7.PubMedCrossRef Binh MB, Sastre-Garau X, Guillou L, de Pinieux G, Terrier P, Lagace R, et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes: a comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(10):1340–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kashima T, Halai D, Ye H, Hing SN, Delaney D, Pollock R, et al. Sensitivity of MDM2 amplification and unexpected multiple faint alphoid 12 (alpha 12 satellite sequences) signals in atypical lipomatous tumor. Mod Pathol. 2012. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2012.90 [Epub ahead of print]. Kashima T, Halai D, Ye H, Hing SN, Delaney D, Pollock R, et al. Sensitivity of MDM2 amplification and unexpected multiple faint alphoid 12 (alpha 12 satellite sequences) signals in atypical lipomatous tumor. Mod Pathol. 2012. doi:10.​1038/​modpathol.​2012.​90 [Epub ahead of print].
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Weaver J, Downs-Kelly E, Goldblum JR, Turner S, Kulkarni S, Tubbs RR, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 gene amplification as a diagnostic tool in lipomatous neoplasms. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(8):943–9.PubMedCrossRef Weaver J, Downs-Kelly E, Goldblum JR, Turner S, Kulkarni S, Tubbs RR, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 gene amplification as a diagnostic tool in lipomatous neoplasms. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(8):943–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dei Tos AP, Doglioni C, Piccinin S, Sciot R, Furlanetto A, Boiocchi M, et al. Coordinated expression and amplification of the MDM2, CDK4, and HMGI-C genes in atypical lipomatous tumours. J Pathol. 2000;190(5):531–6.PubMedCrossRef Dei Tos AP, Doglioni C, Piccinin S, Sciot R, Furlanetto A, Boiocchi M, et al. Coordinated expression and amplification of the MDM2, CDK4, and HMGI-C genes in atypical lipomatous tumours. J Pathol. 2000;190(5):531–6.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang H, Erickson-Johnson M, Wang X, Oliveira JL, Nascimento AG, Sim FH, et al. Molecular testing for lipomatous tumors: critical analysis and test recommendations based on the analysis of 405 extremity-based tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(9):1304–11.PubMedCrossRef Zhang H, Erickson-Johnson M, Wang X, Oliveira JL, Nascimento AG, Sim FH, et al. Molecular testing for lipomatous tumors: critical analysis and test recommendations based on the analysis of 405 extremity-based tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(9):1304–11.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishida J, Morita T, Ogose A, Okada K, Kakizaki H, Tajino T, et al. Imaging characteristics of deep-seated lipomatous tumors: intramuscular lipoma, intermuscular lipoma, and lipoma-like liposarcoma. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12(6):533–41.PubMedCrossRef Nishida J, Morita T, Ogose A, Okada K, Kakizaki H, Tajino T, et al. Imaging characteristics of deep-seated lipomatous tumors: intramuscular lipoma, intermuscular lipoma, and lipoma-like liposarcoma. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12(6):533–41.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphey MD, Carroll JF, Flemming DJ, Pope TL, Gannon FH, Kransdorf MJ. From the archives of the AFIP: benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions. Radiographics. 2004;24(5):1433–66.PubMedCrossRef Murphey MD, Carroll JF, Flemming DJ, Pope TL, Gannon FH, Kransdorf MJ. From the archives of the AFIP: benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions. Radiographics. 2004;24(5):1433–66.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kransdorf MJ, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Murphey MD, Foster WC, Temple HT. Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. Radiology. 2002;224(1):99–104.PubMedCrossRef Kransdorf MJ, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Murphey MD, Foster WC, Temple HT. Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. Radiology. 2002;224(1):99–104.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaskin CM, Helms CA. Lipomas, lipoma variants, and well-differentiated liposarcomas (atypical lipomas): results of MRI evaluations of 126 consecutive fatty masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):733–9.PubMedCrossRef Gaskin CM, Helms CA. Lipomas, lipoma variants, and well-differentiated liposarcomas (atypical lipomas): results of MRI evaluations of 126 consecutive fatty masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):733–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto K, Hukuda S, Ishizawa M, Chano T, Okabe H. MRI findings in intramuscular lipomas. Skeletal Radiol. 1999;28(3):145–52.PubMedCrossRef Matsumoto K, Hukuda S, Ishizawa M, Chano T, Okabe H. MRI findings in intramuscular lipomas. Skeletal Radiol. 1999;28(3):145–52.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Galant J, Marti-Bonmati L, Saez F, Soler R, Alcala-Santaella R, Navarro M. The value of fat-suppressed T2 or STIR sequences in distinguishing lipoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(2):337–43.PubMed Galant J, Marti-Bonmati L, Saez F, Soler R, Alcala-Santaella R, Navarro M. The value of fat-suppressed T2 or STIR sequences in distinguishing lipoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(2):337–43.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Doyle AJ, Pang AK, Miller MV, French JG. Magnetic resonance imaging of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma: observer performance using T1-weighted and fluid-sensitive MRI. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52(1):44–8.PubMedCrossRef Doyle AJ, Pang AK, Miller MV, French JG. Magnetic resonance imaging of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma: observer performance using T1-weighted and fluid-sensitive MRI. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52(1):44–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohguri T, Aoki T, Hisaoka M, Watanabe H, Nakamura K, Hashimoto H, et al. Differential diagnosis of benign peripheral lipoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma on MR imaging: is comparison of margins and internal characteristics useful? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(6):1689–94.PubMedCrossRef Ohguri T, Aoki T, Hisaoka M, Watanabe H, Nakamura K, Hashimoto H, et al. Differential diagnosis of benign peripheral lipoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma on MR imaging: is comparison of margins and internal characteristics useful? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(6):1689–94.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosono M, Kobayashi H, Fujimoto R, Kotoura Y, Tsuboyama T, Matsusue Y, et al. Septum-like structures in lipoma and liposarcoma: MR imaging and pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26(3):150–4.PubMedCrossRef Hosono M, Kobayashi H, Fujimoto R, Kotoura Y, Tsuboyama T, Matsusue Y, et al. Septum-like structures in lipoma and liposarcoma: MR imaging and pathologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26(3):150–4.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Donato M, Vanel D, Alberghini M, Mercuri M. Muscle fibers inside a fat tumor: a non-specific imaging finding of benignancy. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(1):27–9.PubMedCrossRef Donato M, Vanel D, Alberghini M, Mercuri M. Muscle fibers inside a fat tumor: a non-specific imaging finding of benignancy. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(1):27–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
MRI characteristics of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma: retrospective comparison with histology and MDM2 gene amplification
verfasst von
Mélanie Brisson
Takeshi Kashima
David Delaney
Roberto Tirabosco
Andrew Clarke
Suzie Cro
Adrienne M. Flanagan
Paul O’Donnell
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1517-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

Skeletal Radiology 5/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.