Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 7/2015

01.07.2015 | Scientific Article

Comparison of ADC values in different malignancies of the skeletal musculature: a multicentric analysis

verfasst von: Alexey Surov, Shuji Nagata, Ahmed A. Abd Razek, Sree Harsha Tirumani, Andreas Wienke, Thomas Kahn

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides essential information regarding tumor composition, such as cellularity and/or perfusion. DWI is helpful in distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions. Malignant intramuscular/soft tissue lesions consist of a wide spectrum of tumors that have different cell counts and matrix. It is presumed that these different tumors have different DWI findings and have different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The aim of this study was to analyze DWI findings of different intramuscular malignancies in a multicentric study by using a standardized DWI protocol, and to compare the ADC values acquired.

Materials and methods

The data banks of four radiology departments were screened retrospectively for malignant intramuscular tumors. Only lesions that were investigated by MRI (with a 1.5-T scanner) using DWI (multishot EPI sequence with b values of 0 and 1,000 s/mm2) were included in the study. Overall, 51 patients (28 women, 23 men; mean age 58.8 ± 16.1 years) with 57 different malignant intramuscular lesions were collected. In every case apparent diffusion constant (ADC) maps were calculated. In 14 patients muscle lymphoma, 11 patients intramuscular metastases from different primary tumors, and in 26 cases several muscle sarcomas were identified.

Results

The mean ADC value of the estimated lesions was 1.24 ± 0.53 × 10−3 mm2s−1, median value, 1.11 × 10−3 mm2s−1, range, 0.54–2.9 × 10−3 mm2s−1. The mean ADC value in muscle metastases was 1.28 ± 0.24 × 10−3 mm2s−1, in muscle lymphoma 0.76 ± 0.14 × 10−3 mm2s−1, and in muscle sarcomas 1.82 ± 0.63 × 10−3 mm2s−1. Muscle lymphoma showed statistically significant lower ADC values in comparison to muscle metastases (p = 0.01) and muscle sarcoma (p = 0.001). There was no significant differences between ADC values in muscle metastases and sarcomas (p = 0.48). ADC values in muscle lymphoma were homogeneous with less inter-patient variability and were within a relatively close range. Muscle sarcomas had a broad range of ADC values.

Conclusion

Intramuscular malignant lesions had different ADC values on DWI. 22.8 % of the tumors analyzed had low ADC values, 26.3 % moderate, and 50.9 % high ADC values. Muscle lymphoma had statistically significantly lower ADC values in comparison to muscle metastases and sarcomas. Muscle sarcomas presented with a broad range of ADC values.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Subhawong TK, Durand DJ, Thawait GK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Characterization of soft tissue masses: can quantitative diffusion weighted imaging reliably distinguish cysts from solid masses? Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:1583–92.CrossRefPubMed Subhawong TK, Durand DJ, Thawait GK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Characterization of soft tissue masses: can quantitative diffusion weighted imaging reliably distinguish cysts from solid masses? Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:1583–92.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki M, Eida S, Sumi M, Nakamura T. Apparent diffusion coefficient for sinonasal diseases: differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1256–62. Sasaki M, Eida S, Sumi M, Nakamura T. Apparent diffusion coefficient for sinonasal diseases: differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1256–62.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fornasa F, Pinali L, Gasparini A, Toniolli E, Montemezzi S. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation. Radiol Med. 2011;116(2):264–75.CrossRefPubMed Fornasa F, Pinali L, Gasparini A, Toniolli E, Montemezzi S. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation. Radiol Med. 2011;116(2):264–75.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Driessen JP, Caldas-Magalhaes J, Janssen LM, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma: association between apparent diffusion coefficient and histologic findings. Radiology 2014;272(2):456–63. Driessen JP, Caldas-Magalhaes J, Janssen LM, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma: association between apparent diffusion coefficient and histologic findings. Radiology 2014;272(2):456–63.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnapauff D, Zeile M, Niederhagen MB, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of tumor cellularity in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:1355–9.CrossRefPubMed Schnapauff D, Zeile M, Niederhagen MB, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of tumor cellularity in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:1355–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi K, Schacht D, Nakazono T, Irie H, Abe H. Diffusion weighted images of metastatic as compared with nonmetastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; doi: 10.1002/jmri.24829.PubMed Yamaguchi K, Schacht D, Nakazono T, Irie H, Abe H. Diffusion weighted images of metastatic as compared with nonmetastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; doi: 10.​1002/​jmri.​24829.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Rijswijk CSP, Kunz P, Hogendoorn PC, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the characterization of soft-tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:302–7. Van Rijswijk CSP, Kunz P, Hogendoorn PC, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the characterization of soft-tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:302–7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Einarsdóttir H, Karlsson M, Wejde J, Bauer HC. Diffusion-weighted MRI of soft tissue tumours. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:959–63.CrossRefPubMed Einarsdóttir H, Karlsson M, Wejde J, Bauer HC. Diffusion-weighted MRI of soft tissue tumours. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:959–63.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Genovese E, Canì A, Rizzo S, Angeretti MG, Leonardi A, Fugazzola C. Comparison between MRI with spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequence (DWI) and histology in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumours. Radiol Med. 2011;116(4):644–56.CrossRefPubMed Genovese E, Canì A, Rizzo S, Angeretti MG, Leonardi A, Fugazzola C. Comparison between MRI with spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequence (DWI) and histology in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumours. Radiol Med. 2011;116(4):644–56.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Razek A, Nada N, Ghaniem M, Elkhamary S. Assessment of soft tissue tumours of the extremities with diffusion echoplanar MR imaging. Radiol Med. 2012;117(1):96–101.CrossRefPubMed Razek A, Nada N, Ghaniem M, Elkhamary S. Assessment of soft tissue tumours of the extremities with diffusion echoplanar MR imaging. Radiol Med. 2012;117(1):96–101.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Surov A, Behrmann C. Diffusion-weighted imaging of skeletal muscle lymphoma. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(7):899–903.CrossRefPubMed Surov A, Behrmann C. Diffusion-weighted imaging of skeletal muscle lymphoma. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(7):899–903.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagata S, Nishimura H, Uchida M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis. Radiat Med. 2008;26(5):287–95.CrossRefPubMed Nagata S, Nishimura H, Uchida M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis. Radiat Med. 2008;26(5):287–95.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Oka K, Yakushiji T, Sato H, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating between desmoid tumors and malignant soft tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33(1):189–93.CrossRefPubMed Oka K, Yakushiji T, Sato H, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating between desmoid tumors and malignant soft tissue tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33(1):189–93.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Surov A, Fiedler E, Voigt W, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of intramuscular metastases. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:439–46.CrossRefPubMed Surov A, Fiedler E, Voigt W, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of intramuscular metastases. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:439–46.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoo MM, Tyler PA, Saifuddin A, Padhani AR. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in musculoskeletal MRI: a critical review. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:665–81.CrossRefPubMed Khoo MM, Tyler PA, Saifuddin A, Padhani AR. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in musculoskeletal MRI: a critical review. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:665–81.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterizing musculoskeletal lesions. Radiographics. 2014;34(5):1163–77.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterizing musculoskeletal lesions. Radiographics. 2014;34(5):1163–77.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Insights into quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI for musculoskeletal tumor imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(3):560–72.CrossRefPubMed Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Insights into quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI for musculoskeletal tumor imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(3):560–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of ADC values in different malignancies of the skeletal musculature: a multicentric analysis
verfasst von
Alexey Surov
Shuji Nagata
Ahmed A. Abd Razek
Sree Harsha Tirumani
Andreas Wienke
Thomas Kahn
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2141-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

Skeletal Radiology 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.