Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2010

01.11.2010 | Original Article

Comparison of two neural network classifiers in the differential diagnosis of essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease by 123I-FP-CIT brain SPECT

verfasst von: Barbara Palumbo, Mario Luca Fravolini, Susanna Nuvoli, Angela Spanu, Kai Stephan Paulus, Orazio Schillaci, Giuseppe Madeddu

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 11/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To contribute to the differentiation of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET), we compared two different artificial neural network classifiers using 123I-FP-CIT SPECT data, a probabilistic neural network (PNN) and a classification tree (ClT).

Methods

123I-FP-CIT brain SPECT with semiquantitative analysis was performed in 216 patients: 89 with ET, 64 with PD with a Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) score of ≤2 (early PD), and 63 with PD with a H&Y score of ≥2.5 (advanced PD). For each of the 1,000 experiments carried out, 108 patients were randomly selected as the PNN training set, while the remaining 108 validated the trained PNN, and the percentage of the validation data correctly classified in the three groups of patients was computed. The expected performance of an “average performance PNN” was evaluated. In analogy, for ClT 1,000 classification trees with similar structures were generated.

Results

For PNN, the probability of correct classification in patients with early PD was 81.9±8.1% (mean±SD), in patients with advanced PD 78.9±8.1%, and in ET patients 96.6±2.6%. For ClT, the first decision rule gave a mean value for the putamen of 5.99, which resulted in a probability of correct classification of 93.5±3.4%. This means that patients with putamen values >5.99 were classified as having ET, while patients with putamen values <5.99 were classified as having PD. Furthermore, if the caudate nucleus value was higher than 6.97 patients were classified as having early PD (probability 69.8±5.3%), and if the value was <6.97 patients were classified as having advanced PD (probability 88.1%±8.8%).

Conclusion

These results confirm that PNN achieved valid classification results. Furthermore, ClT provided reliable cut-off values able to differentiate ET and PD of different severities.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Benamer HTS, Patterson J, Grosset DG. Accurate differentiation of Parkinsonism and essential tremor using visual assessment of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT imaging: the 123I-FP-CIT study. Mov Disord 2000;15(3):503–10.CrossRefPubMed Benamer HTS, Patterson J, Grosset DG. Accurate differentiation of Parkinsonism and essential tremor using visual assessment of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT imaging: the 123I-FP-CIT study. Mov Disord 2000;15(3):503–10.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall V, Grosset D. Role of dopamine transporter imaging in routine clinical practice. Mov Disord 2003;18(12):1415–23.CrossRefPubMed Marshall V, Grosset D. Role of dopamine transporter imaging in routine clinical practice. Mov Disord 2003;18(12):1415–23.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonini A, Berto P, Lopatriello S, Tamma F, Annemans L, Chambers M. Cost-effectiveness of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in the differential diagnosis of essential tremor and Parkinson's disease in Italy. Mov Disord 2008;15;23(15):2202–9.CrossRef Antonini A, Berto P, Lopatriello S, Tamma F, Annemans L, Chambers M. Cost-effectiveness of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in the differential diagnosis of essential tremor and Parkinson's disease in Italy. Mov Disord 2008;15;23(15):2202–9.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Laere K, Varrone A, Booij J, Vander Borght T, Nobili F, Kapucu OL, et al. EANM procedure guidelines for brain neurotransmission SPECT/PET using dopamine D2 receptor ligands, version 2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37(2):434–42.CrossRefPubMed Van Laere K, Varrone A, Booij J, Vander Borght T, Nobili F, Kapucu OL, et al. EANM procedure guidelines for brain neurotransmission SPECT/PET using dopamine D2 receptor ligands, version 2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37(2):434–42.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton D, List A, Butler T, Hogg S, Cawley M. Discrimination between parkinsonian syndrome and essential tremor using artificial neural network classification of quantified DaTSCAN data. Nucl Med Commun 2006;27(12):939–44.CrossRefPubMed Hamilton D, List A, Butler T, Hogg S, Cawley M. Discrimination between parkinsonian syndrome and essential tremor using artificial neural network classification of quantified DaTSCAN data. Nucl Med Commun 2006;27(12):939–44.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Specht DF. Probabilistic neural network. Neural Netw 1990;3(1):109–18.CrossRef Specht DF. Probabilistic neural network. Neural Netw 1990;3(1):109–18.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Breiman L. Hinging hyperplanes for regression, classification and function approximation. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1993;39(3):999–1013.CrossRef Breiman L. Hinging hyperplanes for regression, classification and function approximation. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1993;39(3):999–1013.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Deuschl G, Bain P, Brin M. Consensus Statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor. Ad hoc Scientific Committee. Mov Disord 1998;13 Suppl 3:2–23.PubMed Deuschl G, Bain P, Brin M. Consensus Statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor. Ad hoc Scientific Committee. Mov Disord 1998;13 Suppl 3:2–23.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoehn M, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology 1967;17:427–42.PubMed Hoehn M, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology 1967;17:427–42.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wasserman PD. Advanced methods in neural computing. New York: Van Nostrand Rei Synopsis; 1993. Wasserman PD. Advanced methods in neural computing. New York: Van Nostrand Rei Synopsis; 1993.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression trees. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 1984. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression trees. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 1984.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Page PA, Howard RJ, O’ Brien JT, Buxton-Thomas MS, Pickering AD. Use of neural networks in brain SPECT to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease. J Nucl Med 1996;37:195–200.PubMed Page PA, Howard RJ, O’ Brien JT, Buxton-Thomas MS, Pickering AD. Use of neural networks in brain SPECT to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease. J Nucl Med 1996;37:195–200.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton D, O'Mahony D, Coffey J, Murphy J, O'Hare N, Freyne P, et al. Classification of mild Alzheimer's disease by artificial neural network analysis of SPET data. Nucl Med Commun 1997;18(9):805–10.CrossRefPubMed Hamilton D, O'Mahony D, Coffey J, Murphy J, O'Hare N, Freyne P, et al. Classification of mild Alzheimer's disease by artificial neural network analysis of SPET data. Nucl Med Commun 1997;18(9):805–10.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Warkentin S, Ohlsson M, Wollmer P, Edenbrandt L, Minthon L. Regional cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease: classification and analysis of heterogeneity. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;17(3):207–14.CrossRefPubMed Warkentin S, Ohlsson M, Wollmer P, Edenbrandt L, Minthon L. Regional cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease: classification and analysis of heterogeneity. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;17(3):207–14.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Acton PD, Newberg A. Artificial neural network classifier for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease using [99mTc]TRODAT-1 and SPECT. Phys Med Biol 2006;21;51(12):3057–66.CrossRef Acton PD, Newberg A. Artificial neural network classifier for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease using [99mTc]TRODAT-1 and SPECT. Phys Med Biol 2006;21;51(12):3057–66.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of two neural network classifiers in the differential diagnosis of essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease by 123I-FP-CIT brain SPECT
verfasst von
Barbara Palumbo
Mario Luca Fravolini
Susanna Nuvoli
Angela Spanu
Kai Stephan Paulus
Orazio Schillaci
Giuseppe Madeddu
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 11/2010
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1481-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2010

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2010 Zur Ausgabe