Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2013

01.12.2013 | Original Article

Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry in healthy volunteers of a novel tumour-specific probe for PET/CT imaging: BAY 85-8050

verfasst von: Kamilla Smolarz, Bernd Joachim Krause, Frank Philipp Graner, Franziska Martina Wagner, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Tina Sell, Claudia Bacher-Stier, Lüder Fels, Ludger Dinkelborg, Markus Schwaiger

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 12/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Novel tracers for the diagnosis of malignant disease with PET and PET/CT are being developed as the most commonly used 18F deoxyglucose (FDG) tracer shows certain limitations. Employing radioactively labelled glutamate derivatives for specific imaging of the truncated citrate cycle potentially allows more specific tumour imaging. Radiation dosimetry of the novel tracer BAY 85-8050, a glutamate derivative, was calculated and the effective dose (ED) was compared with that of FDG.

Methods

Five healthy volunteers were included in the study. Attenuation-corrected whole-body PET/CT scans were performed from 0 to 90 min, at 120 and at 240 min after injection of 305.0 ± 17.6 MBq of BAY 85-8050. Organs with moderate to high uptake at any of the imaging time points were used as source organs. Total activity in each organ at each time point was measured. Time–activity curves (TAC) were determined for the whole body and all source organs. The resulting TACs were fitted to exponential equations and accumulated activities were determined. OLINDA/EXM software was used to calculate individual organ doses and the whole-body ED from the acquired data.

Results

Uptake of the tracer was highest in the kidneys due to renal excretion of the tracer, followed by the pancreas, heart wall and osteogenic cells. The mean organ doses were: kidneys 38.4 ± 11.2 μSv/MBq, pancreas 23.2 ± 3.8 μSv/MBq, heart wall 17.4 ± 4.1 μSv/MBq, and osteogenic cells 13.6 ± 3.5 μSv/MBq. The calculated ED was 8.9 ± 1.5 μSv/MBq.

Conclusion

Based on the distribution and dose estimates, the calculated radiation dose of BAY 85-8050 is 2.67 ± 0.45 mSv at a patient dose of 300 MBq, which compares favourably with the radiation dose of FDG (5.7 mSv).
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.PubMedCrossRef Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:78S–88S.PubMed Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:78S–88S.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1200–9.PubMed Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1200–9.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics. 1999;19:61–77.PubMedCrossRef Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics. 1999;19:61–77.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Medina MÁ. Glutamine and cancer. J Nutr. 2001;131:2539S–42S.PubMed Medina MÁ. Glutamine and cancer. J Nutr. 2001;131:2539S–42S.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Krasikova RN, Kuznetsova OF, Fedorova OS, Belokon YN, Maleev VI, Mu L, et al. 4-[(18)F]fluoroglutamic acid (BAY 85-8050), a new amino acid radiotracer for PET imaging of tumors: synthesis and in vitro characterization. J Med Chem. 2011;54:406–10.PubMedCrossRef Krasikova RN, Kuznetsova OF, Fedorova OS, Belokon YN, Maleev VI, Mu L, et al. 4-[(18)F]fluoroglutamic acid (BAY 85-8050), a new amino acid radiotracer for PET imaging of tumors: synthesis and in vitro characterization. J Med Chem. 2011;54:406–10.PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Koglin N, Friebe M, Berndt M, Graham K, Krasikova R, Kuznetsova O, et al. [F-18]BAY 85-8050: a novel tumor specific probe for PET imaging – preclinical results. J Nucl Med. 2010;51 Suppl 2:1535. Koglin N, Friebe M, Berndt M, Graham K, Krasikova R, Kuznetsova O, et al. [F-18]BAY 85-8050: a novel tumor specific probe for PET imaging – preclinical results. J Nucl Med. 2010;51 Suppl 2:1535.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stabin MG. Uncertainties in internal dose calculations for radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:853–60.PubMedCrossRef Stabin MG. Uncertainties in internal dose calculations for radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:853–60.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE. MIRD primer for absorbed dose calculations. New York: The Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1991. Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE. MIRD primer for absorbed dose calculations. New York: The Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1991.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jakoby B, Long M, Carr C, Townsend D. Physical performance of a new combined PET/CT scanner. J Nucl Med. 2007;48 Suppl 2:46P. Jakoby B, Long M, Carr C, Townsend D. Physical performance of a new combined PET/CT scanner. J Nucl Med. 2007;48 Suppl 2:46P.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:81–8.PubMed Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:81–8.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen S, DeNardo GL, Sgouros G, O'Donnell RT, DeNardo SJ. Practical determination of patient-specific marrow dose using radioactivity concentration in blood and body. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:2102–6.PubMed Shen S, DeNardo GL, Sgouros G, O'Donnell RT, DeNardo SJ. Practical determination of patient-specific marrow dose using radioactivity concentration in blood and body. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:2102–6.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–7.PubMed Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–7.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Oxford: Pergamon; 1998. ICRP Publication 80: Addendum 2 to Publication 53. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Oxford: Pergamon; 1998. ICRP Publication 80: Addendum 2 to Publication 53.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vesselle H, Grierson J, Peterson LM, Muzi M, Mankoff DA, Krohn KA. 18F-Fluorothymidine radiation dosimetry in human PET imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1482–8.PubMed Vesselle H, Grierson J, Peterson LM, Muzi M, Mankoff DA, Krohn KA. 18F-Fluorothymidine radiation dosimetry in human PET imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1482–8.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pauleit D, Floeth F, Herzog H, Hamacher K, Tellmann L, Müller HW, et al. Whole-body distribution and dosimetry of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:519–24.PubMedCrossRef Pauleit D, Floeth F, Herzog H, Hamacher K, Tellmann L, Müller HW, et al. Whole-body distribution and dosimetry of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:519–24.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry in healthy volunteers of a novel tumour-specific probe for PET/CT imaging: BAY 85-8050
verfasst von
Kamilla Smolarz
Bernd Joachim Krause
Frank Philipp Graner
Franziska Martina Wagner
Hans-Jürgen Wester
Tina Sell
Claudia Bacher-Stier
Lüder Fels
Ludger Dinkelborg
Markus Schwaiger
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 12/2013
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2502-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2013

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2013 Zur Ausgabe