nach oben

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Erschienen in:

Open Access 27.01.2016 | Original Article

Quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaques on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI: comparison with a PET/CT hybrid system

verfasst von: Xiang Li, Daniel Heber, Ivo Rausch, Dietrich Beitzke, Marius E. Mayerhoefer, Sazan Rasul, Michael Kreissl, Markus Mitthauser, Wolfgang Wadsak, Markus Hartenbach, Alexander Haug, Xiaoli Zhang, Christian Loewe, Thomas Beyer, Marcus Hacker

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 8/2016

Abstract

Purpose

PET with ¹⁸F-FDG has the potential to assess vascular macrophage metabolism. ¹⁸F-FDG is most often used in combination with contrast-enhanced CT to localize increased metabolism to specific arterial lesions. Novel ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI hybrid imaging shows high potential for the combined evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques, due to the superior morphological conspicuity of plaque lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI uptake quantification compared to PET/CT as a reference standard in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaques.

Methods

The study group comprised 34 consecutive oncological patients with carotid plaques who underwent both PET/CT and PET/MRI with ¹⁸F-FDG on the same day. The presence of atherosclerotic plaques was confirmed by 3 T MRI scans. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) for carotid plaque lesions and the average SUV of the blood pool within the adjacent internal jugular vein were determined and target-to-blood ratios (TBRs, plaque to blood pool) were calculated.

Results

Atherosclerotic lesions with maximum colocalized focal FDG uptake were assessed in each patient. SUV_max values of carotid plaque lesions were significantly lower on PET/MRI than on PET/CT (2.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6; P < 0.01), but were significantly correlated between PET/CT and PET/MRI (Spearman’s r = 0.67, P < 0.01). In contrast, TBR_max values of plaque lesions were similar on PET/MRI and on PET/CT (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3; P = 0.4), and again were significantly correlated between PET/MRI and PET/CT (Spearman’s r = 0.73, P < 0.01). Considering the increasing trend in SUV_max and TBR_max values from early to delayed imaging time-points on PET/CT and PET/MRI, respectively, with continuous clearance of radioactivity from the blood, a slight underestimation of TBR_max values may also be expected with PET/MRI compared with PET/CT.

Conclusion

SUV_max and TBR_max values are widely accepted reference parameters for estimation of the radioactivity of atherosclerotic plaques on PET/CT. However, due to a systematic underestimation of SUV_max and TBR_max with PET/MRI, the optimal cut-off values indicating the presence of inflamed plaque tissue need to be newly defined for PET/MRI.

Xiang Li and Daniel Heber contributed equally to this work.

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3375-8.

Introduction

An excessively high rate of sudden death due to cerebrovascular diseases in apparently healthy individuals without prior symptoms has been reported [1]. The most frequent cause is a sudden rupture of an unstable atherosclerotic plaque, which results in either thrombotic occlusion at the site of rupture or distal embolization [2, 3]. It remains a major challenge for preventative medicine to identify high-risk patients who would benefit from intervention prior to a rupture of a nascent plaque. In the evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques, the thin cap fibroatheroma is recognized as the plaque type with the highest risk of rupture [4]. On conventional imaging, MRI, because of its excellent soft tissue contrast, provides the unique potential to identify most of the pathomorphological key features of vulnerable carotid plaques.

One of the primary determinants of atherosclerotic plaque ruptures is inflammation, which leads to a high number of strokes and myocardial infarctions [5]. PET is a method for investigating the pathophysiology and propagation of diseases with the help of radiotracers [6, 7]. Numerous metabolic and pathophysiological biomarkers associated with plaque vulnerability have been investigated as targets for PET imaging. Among them, ¹⁸F-FDG is the PET tracer that is most commonly used to assess inflamed plaques by evaluating the corresponding glucose metabolism [8‐11], particularly of resident macrophages, which most avidly accumulate ¹⁸F-FDG. However, PET imaging is limited by a relatively low spatial resolution, and thus the use of morphological imaging is needed to localize the tracer uptake [12], which can be provided by dual modality imaging systems such as PET/CT and PET/MRI. PET/CT allows fast data acquisition and the CT dataset can be reliably used as a transmission scan for attenuation correction (AC) of the PET data [13]. It has also been shown that vessel calcifications on non-contrast CT scans correlate significantly with the patient’s overall plaque burden [14].

With regard to characterization of arterial plaques, MRI possesses several inherent advantages over CT, including higher spatial resolution, an excellent soft tissue contrast, and a lack of ionizing radiation. Furthermore, in the setting of PET/MRI hybrid imaging, PET and MRI can be performed simultaneously, which enables real-time MRI motion and partial-volume correction of the PET data. Therefore, the combination of 3-T MRI with simultaneous PET imaging for comprehensive evaluation of carotid plaques has great potential [15], but with the caveat of suboptimal PET AC based on MRI (MR-AC) [16]. The MR signal intensity is not proportional to the amount of gamma photon attenuation [17, 18], so that MR-AC is more challenging than CT-AC. Previous research has demonstrated a significant correlation of the tracer uptake ratio from PET using MR-AC with the ratio from PET using CT-AC in head and neck cancer [19]. Nevertheless, reliable quantification of vessel wall inflammation by PET/MRI has not yet been demonstrated. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) is the most commonly used value for quantification of radioactivity on PET. In addition, the target-to-blood pool ratio (TBR) is widely accepted for measuring the inflammatory activity of atherosclerotic plaques on PET [11].

In the present study of patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaques, we examined the accuracy and reliability of clinical PET/MR imaging, based on the SUV and TBR values in comparison to PET/CT as reference.

Materials and methods

Patients

We reviewed PET/CT and PET/MR imaging studies in 247 oncological patients who underwent both procedures for staging and restaging of different cancer types between March 2014 and March 2015. Of these patients, 34 showed colocalized focal uptake (TBR ≥1.6) at the carotid bifurcation on both PET/CT and PET/MRI, and were included in this study. Baseline data for the study patients, including type of cancer, age, gender, BMI, blood sugar concentration and diabetes, are presented in Table 1. This retrospective image analysis was approved by the local ethics committee. For identification of patients with carotid plaque lesions, MR image sets from PET/MRI were used.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population

Characteristic	Value
No. of patients	34
Age (years), mean ± SD (range)	61 ± 9 (52 – 84)
Male, n (%)	23 (64)
Body mass index (kg/m²), mean ± SD (range)	26 ± 3.9 (19 – 31)
Plasma glucose (mg/dL), mean ± SD (range)	104 ± 15 (71 – 128)
Diabetes, n (%)	3 (8)
Cancer type, n (%)
Lymphoma	27 (79)
Head and neck cancer	4 (12)
Thyroid cancer	3 (9)

PET/CT imaging

All patients underwent an ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan on a dedicated PET/CT system (Siemens Biograph TPTV 64; Siemens, Knoxville, TN) consisting of an LSO-based full-ring PET scanner and a 64-row multidetector CT scanner. In 30 patients (88 %) contrast medium was injected for the CT scan. On the day of the scan, patients fasted for at least 6 h; their mean glucose level was 103 ± 14.4 mg/dL (range 71 – 128 mg/dL). ¹⁸F-FDG was injected intravenously at 4.2 ± 0.9 MBq/kg body weight (range 3.3 – 5.5 MBq/kg). After an uptake period of 74 ± 13 min (range 47 – 92 min), transmission data were acquired from the base of the skull or the vertex to the proximal thighs. PET emission data were then acquired in 3D mode with a 168 × 168 matrix (pixel size 4.2 mm) with an emission time of 3 min per bed position. After decay and scatter correction, PET data were reconstructed iteratively, applying point-spread function (PSF) correction (TrueX algorithm) using four iterations and 21 subsets. The CT data were used for AC.

PET/MR imaging

After PET/CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR imaging was performed on a Biograph mMR system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) incorporating a 3-T MRI scanner. The PET/MRI acquisition was started 140 ± 21 min (range 100 – 189 min) after administration of ¹⁸F-FDG. PET/MR images were acquired in four or five bed positions with 5 min per bed position. The MR imaging component was performed with an integrated radiofrequency coil and a multistation protocol, with a slice thickness of 2 mm. AC was performed using the implemented standard four-compartment model attenuation map calculated from a Dixon-based VIBE (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination) sequence. A 3D ordinary Poisson ordered subsets expectation maximization (OP-OSEM) algorithm with PSF correction with three iterations and 21 subsets was used for reconstruction. The image matrix size was 172 × 172 (pixel size 4.2 mm). The images were smoothed with a 3-mm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) gaussian filter.

Image analysis

Automatic image orientation, 3D image fusion, and image analysis for both PET/MRI and PET/CT were performed with commercially available software (Hermes Hybrid 3D; Hermes Medical Solutions, Stockholm, Sweden). In a first step, two cardiovascular radiology specialists blinded to the patients’ clinical information visually evaluated the MR images (T1-weighted VIBE Dixon sequence) for the presence of plaques at the left and right carotid artery bifurcation. In a second step, two nuclear medicine physicians blinded to the clinical information determined colocalized focal uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG on both PET/CT and PET/MRI for the visualized carotid plaque lesions. To assess the reproducibility of the SUVs obtained, all lesions were reassessed by the same physicians after 3 weeks. In a third step, SUV_max values of carotid plaques were obtained for both PET/CT and PET/MRI using a region-of-interest (ROI) approach. To calculate TBRs, respective SUV_max values were corrected for background blood-pool activity, which was calculated as the mean SUV of four ROIs within the lumen of both (left and right) internal jugular veins and both (left and right) external jugular veins. Carotid plaques detectable on both sides were detected in 12 patients. In those patients, contralateral ROI analysis was performed for the less prominent atherosclerotic bifurcation region. Correction for radioactive decay was applied automatically by the system for both PET/CT and PET/MRI based on the injection time. The circulation time of ¹⁸F-FDG is a major factor that can influence the SUV and TBR values within plaques. We performed a regression analysis to evaluate the relationship between the plaque and blood pool uptake ratios.

Statistical methods

SPSS version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY) was used for statistical analysis. Continuous variables with a normal distribution were recorded as means ± standard deviation. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between PET/CT and PET/MRI SUVs and TBR values. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated to test interobserver and intraobserver agreement for TBR. Two-way random ICCs greater than 0.8 were accepted as indicating excellent reproducibility. Group comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Regression analyses for the SUV_max and TBR_max of carotid plaques on PET/CT and PET/MRI with circulation time were performed. Bland Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between the two measurements. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations with range.

Results

Detection of carotid plaques

Carotid plaques were detected in 52 patients from the MR images with T1-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences in the neck and head region. Of these patients, 34 with colocalized focal uptake (TBR ≥1.6) on both PET/CT and PET/MRI were included in this study. The carotid plaque lesion in each of these 34 patients with the highest focal uptake was assessed on PET/CT and PET/MRI. Calcified spots (≥200 HU) were detected on carotid plaques in five patients using CT. Representative images are shown in Fig. 1.

Quantitative analysis of PET data from PET/CT and PET/MRI

The mean ¹⁸F-FDG SUV_max of carotid plaques on PET/MRI was significantly lower than the value on PET/CT, but the values on PET/MRI and PET/CT were significantly correlated (Spearman’s r = 0.67, P < 0.01; Table 2). Blood-pool uptake was higher on PET/CT (1.4 ± 0.3, range 0.9 – 2.0) than on PET/MRI (1.1 ± 0.2, range 0.8 – 1.7; P = 0.1) due to clearance of ¹⁸F-FDG from the blood over time.

Table 2

Comparison of mean SUV_max values from PET/CT and PET/MRI for the 34 carotid plaque lesions

	SUV_max		Spearman’s r	P value^a
	Mean ± SD	Range
PET/CT	3.1 ± 0.6	2.2 – 4.7	0.67	0.01
PET/MRI	2.3 ± 0.6	1.7 – 4.5

^aOne-way ANOVA

In contrast, there was no significant difference between the mean TBR_max values of plaque lesions on PET/CT and PET/MRI, and the correlation of TBR_max values between PET/CT and PET/MRI was even better (Spearman’s r = 0.73, P < 0.01; Table 3). The linear regression correlation coefficients (R) for the uptake values obtained from the two systems were 0.75 for SUV_max and 0.73 for TBR_max (Fig. 2a, b). Bland Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between the two measurements, with a lower bias for TBR_mean (−0.07) than the bias for SUV_mean (0.8) between PET/CT and PET/MRI, corresponding to a zero difference (Fig. 2c, d). In the assessment of individual patients, the SUV_max values from the PET/CT images were higher than those from the PET/MR images in all patients (Fig. 3a). However, in 20 patients, the TBR_max value from the PET/MR images was higher than that from the PET/CT images (Fig. 3b).

Table 3

Comparison between TBR_max values from PET/CT and PET/MRI for the 34 carotid plaque lesions

	TBR_max		Spearman’s r	P value^a
	Mean ± SD	Range	Spearman’s r	P value^a
PET/CT	2.2 ± 0.3	1.7 – 2.7	0.73	0.3
PET/MRI	2.2 ± 0.3	1.6 – 2.8	0.73	0.3

^aOne-way ANOVA

A comprehensive group analysis comparing patients with TBR(PET/CT) < TBR(PET/MRI) (group 1, n = 20) and patients with TBR(PET/CT) ≥ TBR(PET/MRI) (group 2, n = 14) was performed (Table 4), which demonstrated a lower blood-pool activity in group 1 with a longer average circulation time on PET/MR scans, and patients in group 1 had slightly higher mean SUV_max and TBR_max on PET/MR scans. In 12 patients, a significantly higher uptake was detected on the plaque side than on the less prominent side on both PET/CT and PET/MRI; likewise, significantly higher TBR values were obtained for plaque lesions than for less prominent lesions on both PET/CT and PET/MRI (Table 5).

Table 4

Group analysis comparing patients with TBR(PET/CT) < TBR(PET/MRI) (group 1, n = 20) and patients with TBR(PET/CT) ≥ TBR(PET/MRI) (group 2, n = 14)

Parameter	Group 1		Group 2		P value^a
Parameter	Mean ± SD	Range	Mean ± SD	Range	P value^a
SUV_max
PET/CT	3.1 ± 0.7	2.2 – 4.7	3.0 ± 0.4	2.5 – 3.7	0.5
PET/MRI	2.4 ± 0.7	1.7 – 4.5	2.2 ± 0.3	1.7 – 2.9	0.2
Blood pool
PET/CT	1.4 ± 0.3	1.1 – 2.0	1.4 ± 0.2	0.9 – 1.7	0.3
PET/MRI	1.0 ± 0.2	0.9 – 1.7	1.1 ± 0.2	0.8 – 1.4	0.6
TBR_max
PET/CT	2.1 ± 0.3	1.8 – 2.6	2.2 ± 0.3	1.7 – 2.7	0.5
PET/MRI	2.3 ± 0.3	1.9 – 2.8	2.1 ± 0.3	1.6 – 2.5	0.08
Circulation time (min)
PET/CT	74.6 ± 11.8	47 – 92	73.2 ± 11.6	55 – 92	0.7
PET/MRI	141.5 ± 19.8	101 – 173	132.7 ± 23.5	100 – 189	0.4

^aOne-way ANOVA

Table 5

SUV_max and TBR_max values from contralateral lesions (n = 12) and carotid plaque lesions (n = 12) as obtained on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI

	PET/CT						PET/MRI
	Contralateral side			Plaque		P value^a	Contralateral side	Plaque	P value^a
	Mean ± SD	Range	Mean ± SD	Range	Mean ± SD	P value^a	Range	Mean ± SD	P value^a	Range
SUV	2.5 ± 0.4	1.8 – 3.2	2.4 – 4.5)	2.4 – 4.5	<0.01	1.7 ± 0.3	1.2 – 2.3	2.3 ± 0.5	1.7 – 3.7	<0.01
TBR	1.7 ± 0.2	1.2 – 2.1	2.2 ± 0.3	1.7 – 2.7	<0.01	1.6 ± 0.3	1.1 – 1.9	2.2 ± 0.3	1.6 – 2.8	<0.01

^aOne-way ANOVA

In the regression analyses between uptake value and circulation time on PET/CT and PET/MRI, both SUV_max and TBR_max in the plaque showed an up-trend from the early time to the later time on the PET/CT and PET/MRI, respectively, and continued clearance of blood was observed as well (Fig. 4).

Intraclass correlation coefficients

There were excellent interobserver (R = 0.87) and intraobserver (R = 0.96) correlations, along with 95 % confidence intervals for ¹⁸F-FDG SUVs.

Discussion

Among cardiovascular imaging modalities, MRI has emerged as a powerful tool for the assessment of the composition of plaques, while PET has been investigated widely in cardiovascular disease because it offers functional quantitative information at the molecular level [20, 21]. In the present study, we compared the quantification of glucose uptake in carotid plaque lesions on PET/MRI, with PET/CT as the standard of reference. The main result was that quantification of FDG uptake in the carotid arteries is feasible with integrated PET/MRI, and TBR can be measured with similar accuracy to that obtained with PET/CT. Qualitatively, this had already been shown by one case study of simultaneous PET/MR imaging and MR angiography of atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery, which revealed significant ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in carotid plaques [22]. Nevertheless, SUV_max values from PET/MR were significantly lower than those from PET/CT, which is in line with the results of previous studies comparing quantitative values from PET/MR with those from PET/CT in oncological imaging. Underestimation of SUV_max on PET/MR has been observed for different organs (liver, lung, spleen, bone and muscle) [23].

Furthermore, in an initial feasibility study on the quantification of vessel wall signals in carotid arteries of HIV patients at increased risk of atherosclerosis, Ripa et al. found significantly lower ¹⁸F-FDG SUV_mean and SUV_max values on PET/MRI than on PET/CT [24]. This difference in SUV may have been for physiological and/or technical reasons. SUV is a snapshot of the accumulated FDG in a certain region. As FDG uptake is a dynamic process, SUV can change with time after tracer injection [25]. Nevertheless, a previous study of ¹⁸F-FDG kinetics in atherosclerotic patients showed no significant differences in SUV_max and TBR_max values between 1 and 3 h after tracer injection [26]. Furthermore, in our study, there was no significant difference in TBR values during the same period. Therefore, a substantial physiological change in SUV between 74 ± 13 and 140 ± 21 min after injection would not be expected to cause the great differences in SUV found in the present study. Blomberg et al. also demonstrated significantly increased TBR on delayed ¹⁸FDG PET/CT (180 min) compared with early imaging (90 min) due to the declining blood pool and the extended uptake of tracer [27]. However, in our study, we did not find significantly increased TBR values on PET/MRI compared with PET/CT. To summarize, in our study, there was a lower mean SUV_max and no significant increase in mean TBR_max values on later PET/MRI scans compared with earlier PET/CT scans, which indicated systematic underestimations of both SUV and TBR in the evaluation of plaque uptake. As shown in Table 4, patients with higher TBR_max values on PET/MRI than on PET/CT showed lower blood-pool activities and longer circulation times, on average. This corresponds to previous findings [27].

Analysis of agreement between PET/CT and PET/MRI measurements showed similar regression ratios for SUV_max and TBR_max values between the two systems, whereas Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a lower bias of −0.07 for mean TBR compared with 0.8 for SUV, which indicates a higher agreement between PET/CT and PET/MRI measurement for TBR (Fig. 2).

Technical aspects affecting the SUV include differences in the reconstruction method, postfiltering, partial volume effects and differences in attenuation and scatter correction. The differences in reconstruction in this study were minimal. Both PET/CT and PET/MR images were reconstructed using an OSEM algorithm with PSF correction developed by the same vendor. The most prominent difference was the use of different numbers of iterations for the convergence, and therefore the recovery of activity was dependent on the number of iterations, and, as shown by Hudson and Larkin [28], on the product of iterations and subsets. A study by Knäusl et al. [29] showed that between iteration–subset products of 84 and 64 there are differences of 1 – 9 % in the SUVmax for spheres (11.5 – 0.3 ml in size) in a modified NEMA image quality phantom. We used the same reconstruction algorithm in our study for the PET/CT examinations. With regard to the differences in postfiltering, a study by Tong et al. [30] found a reduced contrast recovery of between 5 % and 8 % for spheres of 10 – 22 mm in diameter for a similar reconstruction, after applying a 4-mm FWHM gaussian filter.

Taking these findings into account, the underestimation of SUV can be partially (we estimate around 10 % of the mean of 25 %) explained by the differences in the reconstruction methods used. The partial volume effect was not an issue in the current study, as it is dependent on pixel size, and similar pixel sizes were used for PET/CT and PET/MRI reconstructions. The main cause of the underestimation is thought to have resulted from differences in AC. As bone is ignored on standard MR-AC [17], and the proportion of bone is rather high in the neck region, the omission of bone from AC could cause a substantial under-correction of the activity values, and thus of the SUV [31]. A solution to the issue of inaccurate AC in this case could be to use TBR rather than SUV. If the reference region used to normalize lesion uptake is located close to the lesion itself, similar underestimation can be expected for both values, and therefore the underestimations will cancel each other out, which is supported by the findings of the present study. Moreover, SUV quantification in vessels is affected by adjacent blood-pool activity. There is thus a widely accepted consensus that TBR, which is corrected for the interference of blood-pool activity, should be used instead of SUV. For the calculation of TBR, we used the mean blood activity from both internal jugular veins and external jugular veins as the blood pool activity. To avoid registration problems, we chose the carotid bifurcation region for the present study, because this region is particularly prone to plaque formation [32], and enables high registration accuracy when estimating the colocalized uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG on PET/CT and PET/MRI.

Considering the reduced radiation dose and superior lesion discernment, PET/MRI might be used as an alternative to PET/CT in the evaluation of carotid plaque lesions. However, AC in PET/MRI is still challenging, and underestimations of both SUV and TBR were observed in this study; thus, a reliable quantitative criterion based on cut-off uptake ratios for inflamed plaque is required. In addition, high cost, as well as longer examination times, also limit the application of PET/MRI.

There were several limitations to this study. First, the study included a limited number of oncological patients, and therefore the findings might not be applicable to the general population. Second, advanced morphological assessment of carotid plaques was not performed. Third, histological or autoradiographic validation of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake quantification in the carotid plaques could not be provided. Fourth, nonrandomization of imaging sequences and distinct imaging reconstruction methods may have caused confounded uptake ratios. However, such studies have previously been published for PET/CT evaluation [8], and this is why PET/CT was chosen as the reference standard in the present study.

Conclusion

SUV_max and TBR_max values are the widely accepted reference parameters for estimation of the radioactivity of atherosclerotic plaques on PET/CT. However, due to systematic underestimation of SUV_max and TBR_max on PET/MRI, the optimal cut-off values indicating the presence of inflamed plaque tissue need to be newly defined for PET/MRI.

Acknowledgments

Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by a research grant of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), KLIF 382.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical approval

All retrospective analyses involving human participants in the present study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt testen ¹

e.Med Radiologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Radiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Radiologie, den Premium-Inhalten der radiologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Radiologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ²

Davies MJ, Thomas AC. Plaque fissuring – the cause of acute myocardial infarction, sudden ischaemic death, and crescendo angina. Br Heart J. 1985;53:363–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Casscells W, Naghavi M, Willerson JT. Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque: a multifocal disease. Circulation. 2003;107:2072–5.CrossRefPubMed

Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1282–92.CrossRefPubMed

Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664–72.CrossRefPubMed

Hansson GK. Inflammation and immune response in atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 1999;1:150–5.CrossRefPubMed

Li X, Samnick S, Lapa C, Israel I, Buck AK, Kreissl MC, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for the detection of inflammation of large arteries: correlation with18F-FDG, calcium burden and risk factors. EJNMMI Res. 2012;2:52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Strobl FF, Rominger A, Wolpers S, Rist C, Bamberg F, Thierfelder KM, et al. Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on vessel wall inflammation and calcified plaque burden differs across vascular beds: a PET-CT study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29:1899–908.CrossRefPubMed

Rudd JH, Warburton EA, Fryer TD, Jones HA, Clark JC, Antoun N, et al. Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2002;105:2708–11.CrossRefPubMed

Saam T, Rominger A, Wolpers S, Nikolaou K, Rist C, Greif M, et al. Association of inflammation of the left anterior descending coronary artery with cardiovascular risk factors, plaque burden and pericardial fat volume: a PET/CT study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1203–12.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Hetterich H, Rominger A, Walter L, Habs M, Volpers S, Hacker M, et al. Natural history of atherosclerotic disease progression as assessed by (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;32:49–59. doi:10.1007/s10554-015-0660-8.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tawakol A, Migrino RQ, Bashian GG, Bedri S, Vermylen D, Cury RC, et al. In vivo 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging provides a noninvasive measure of carotid plaque inflammation in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1818–24.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Rudd JH, Narula J, Strauss HW, Virmani R, Machac J, Klimas M, et al. Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation by fluorodeoxyglucose with positron emission tomography: ready for prime time? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2527–35.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, Sashin D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys. 1998;25:2046–53.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation. 1995;92:2157–62.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Ripa RS, Kjaer A. Imaging atherosclerosis with hybrid positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:914516.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Bezrukov I, Mantlik F, Schmidt H, Scholkopf B, Pichler BJ. MR-based PET attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2013;43:45–59.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Wagenknecht G, Kaiser HJ, Mottaghy FM, Herzog H. MRI for attenuation correction in PET: methods and challenges. MAGMA. 2013;26:99–113.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hofmann M, Pichler B, Scholkopf B, Beyer T. Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:S93–104.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Partovi S, Kohan A, Vercher-Conejero JL, Rubbert C, Margevicius S, Schluchter MD, et al. Qualitative and quantitative performance of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI versus 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:1970–5.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik DE, French BA, Swirski FK, Bengel F, Sadeghi MM, et al. Multimodality cardiovascular molecular imaging, part II. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:56–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Sinusas AJ, Bengel F, Nahrendorf M, Epstein FH, Wu JC, Villanueva FS, et al. Multimodality cardiovascular molecular imaging, part I. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:244–56.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Rischpler C, Nekolla SG, Dregely I, Schwaiger M. Hybrid PET/MR imaging of the heart: potential, initial experiences, and future prospects. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:402–15.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M, Beer AJ, Furst S, Martinez-Moller A, et al. First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:845–55.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ripa RS, Knudsen A, Hag AM, Lebech AM, Loft A, Keller SH, et al. Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid artery: first clinical experience and comparison to PET/CT. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;3:361–71.PubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, Graham MM, Karp J, Lammertsma AA, et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute trials. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1059–66.PubMed

26.

Menezes LJ, Kotze CW, Hutton BF, Endozo R, Dickson JC, Cullum I, et al. Vascular inflammation imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT: when to image? J Nucl Med. 2009;50:854–7.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Blomberg BA, Thomassen A, Takx RA, Hildebrandt MG, Simonsen JA, Buch-Olsen KM, et al. Delayed 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging improves quantitation of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation: results from the CAMONA study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:588–97.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13:601–9.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Knäusl B, Rausch IF, Bergmann H, Dudczak R, Hirtl A, Georg D. Influence of PET reconstruction parameters on the TrueX algorithm. A combined phantom and patient study. Nuklearmedizin. 2013;52:28–35.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Tong S, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE. Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:1453–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Aznar MC, Sersar R, Saabye J, Ladefoged CN, Andersen FL, Rasmussen JH, et al. Whole-body PET/MRI: the effect of bone attenuation during MR-based attenuation correction in oncology imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:1177–83.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Schulz UG, Rothwell PM. Major variation in carotid bifurcation anatomy: a possible risk factor for plaque development? Stroke. 2001;32:2522–9.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaques on 18F-FDG PET/MRI: comparison with a PET/CT hybrid system
verfasst von: Xiang Li
Daniel Heber
Ivo Rausch
Dietrich Beitzke
Marius E. Mayerhoefer
Sazan Rasul
Michael Kreissl
Markus Mitthauser
Wolfgang Wadsak
Markus Hartenbach
Alexander Haug
Xiaoli Zhang
Christian Loewe
Thomas Beyer
Marcus Hacker
Publikationsdatum: 27.01.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3308-6

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and methods

Patients

PET/CT imaging

PET/MR imaging

Image analysis

Statistical methods

Results

Detection of carotid plaques

Quantitative analysis of PET data from PET/CT and PET/MRI

Intraclass correlation coefficients

Discussion

Conclusion

Acknowledgments

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

Conflicts of interest

Ethical approval

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

e.Med Radiologie

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Detection of recurrent prostate cancer lesions before salvage lymphadenectomy is more accurate with 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC than with 18F-Fluoroethylcholine PET/CT

Development of a nomogram combining clinical staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT image features in non-small-cell lung cancer stage I–III

Segmental quantitative myocardial perfusion with PET for the detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina

Erratum to: FDG-PET/ceCT is useful to predict recurrence of Pseudomyxoma peritonei

The 2015 Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma: the “evidence-based” refusal to endorse them by EANM due to the “not evidence-based” marginalization of the role of Nuclear Medicine

Recurrent prosthetic mitral valve infective endocarditis and perivalvular abscess: first description by PET/CT angiography