Skip to main content
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasenclever D, Kurch L, Mauz-Körholz, et al. qPET – a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1301–8.CrossRefPubMed Hasenclever D, Kurch L, Mauz-Körholz, et al. qPET – a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1301–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Annunziata S, Cuccaro A, Calcagni ML, Hohaus S, Giordano A, Rufini V. Interim FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin lymphoma: the prognostic role of the ratio between target lesion and liver SUVmax (rPET). Ann Nucl Med. 2016;30:588–92.CrossRefPubMed Annunziata S, Cuccaro A, Calcagni ML, Hohaus S, Giordano A, Rufini V. Interim FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin lymphoma: the prognostic role of the ratio between target lesion and liver SUVmax (rPET). Ann Nucl Med. 2016;30:588–92.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Laffon E, Marthan R. Interim FDG PET scans in lymphoma: SUV measurement error may impair qPET methodology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:2154.CrossRefPubMed Laffon E, Marthan R. Interim FDG PET scans in lymphoma: SUV measurement error may impair qPET methodology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:2154.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasenclever D, Kurch L, Kluge R. Sources of variability in FDG PET imaging and the qPET value: reply to Laffon and Marthan. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:2155–7.CrossRefPubMed Hasenclever D, Kurch L, Kluge R. Sources of variability in FDG PET imaging and the qPET value: reply to Laffon and Marthan. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:2155–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Laffon E, Milpied N, Marthan R. Measurement uncertainty of lesion and reference mediastinum SUV in lung cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2017. Accepted for publication. Laffon E, Milpied N, Marthan R. Measurement uncertainty of lesion and reference mediastinum SUV in lung cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2017. Accepted for publication.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Meignan M, Cottereau AS, Versari A, et al. Baseline metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in high–tumor-burden follicular lymphoma: a pooled analysis of three multicenter studies. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3618–26.CrossRef Meignan M, Cottereau AS, Versari A, et al. Baseline metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in high–tumor-burden follicular lymphoma: a pooled analysis of three multicenter studies. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3618–26.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat JCGM 2008. Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. www.bipm.org. 2008. JCGM 2008. Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. www.​bipm.​org. 2008.
Metadaten
Titel
FDG PET for therapy monitoring in Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: qPET versus rPET
verfasst von
Eric Laffon
Roger Marthan
Publikationsdatum
18.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3719-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe