Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2007

01.06.2007

Sonographic subcutaneous and visceral fat indices represent the distribution of body fat volume

verfasst von: Masahiko Koda, Miho Senda, Masayuki Kamba, Koji Kimura, Yoshikazu Murawaki

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A reliable method for direct measurement of both subcutaneous and visceral fat volume is the measurement of fat tissue area from tomographic pictures by CT or by MR imaging. However, these are not widely usable because of high cost and/or exposure to radiation.

Methods

We compared sonographic subcutaneous and visceral fat indices with fat distribution by serial-slice MR imaging in 17 subjects. Sonographic subcutaneous or visceral fat index is standardized thickness of subcutaneous fat tissue or the intra-abdominal depth at the level of umbilicus by height.

Results

Sonographic visceral fat index and intra-abdominal depth were significantly correlated with visceral fat volume by serial-slice MR imaging (r = 0.746, r = 0.726, respectively). Similarly, sonographic subcutaneous fat index and subcutaneous fat thickness were significantly correlated with subcutaneous fat volume by serial-slice MR imaging (r = 0.825, r = 0.816, respectively). The ratio of sonographic visceral fat index and sonographic subcutaneous fat index was closely correlated with the ratio of the visceral fat volume and the subcutaneous fat volume by single-slice MR imaging, which proves to be related to cardiovascular disease risk (r = 0.722).

Conclusion

Sonographic subcutaneous or visceral fat index could be an easily measured and inexpensive indicator for the assessment of fat distribution instead of CT or MR imaging.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kissebah AH, Vydelingum N, Murray R, et al. (1982) Relation of body fat distribution to metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 54:254–260PubMedCrossRef Kissebah AH, Vydelingum N, Murray R, et al. (1982) Relation of body fat distribution to metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 54:254–260PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalkhoff RK, Hartz AH, Rupley D, et al. (1983) Relationship of body fat distribution to blood pressure, carbohydrate tolerance, and plasma lipids in healthy obese women. J Lab Clin Med 102:621–627PubMed Kalkhoff RK, Hartz AH, Rupley D, et al. (1983) Relationship of body fat distribution to blood pressure, carbohydrate tolerance, and plasma lipids in healthy obese women. J Lab Clin Med 102:621–627PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Larsson B, Svardsudd K, Welin L, et al. (1984) Abdominal adipose tissue distribution, obesity, and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: 13 year follow up of participants in the study of men born in 1913. Br Med J 288:1401–1404CrossRef Larsson B, Svardsudd K, Welin L, et al. (1984) Abdominal adipose tissue distribution, obesity, and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: 13 year follow up of participants in the study of men born in 1913. Br Med J 288:1401–1404CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujioka S, Matsuzawa Y, Tokunaga K, et al. (1987) Contribution of intra-abdominal fat accumulation to the impairment of glucose and lipid metabolism in human obesity. Metabolism 36:54–59PubMedCrossRef Fujioka S, Matsuzawa Y, Tokunaga K, et al. (1987) Contribution of intra-abdominal fat accumulation to the impairment of glucose and lipid metabolism in human obesity. Metabolism 36:54–59PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokunaga K, Matsuzawa Y, Ishikawa K, et al. (1983) A novel technique for the determination of body fat by computed tomography. Int J Obes 7:437–445PubMed Tokunaga K, Matsuzawa Y, Ishikawa K, et al. (1983) A novel technique for the determination of body fat by computed tomography. Int J Obes 7:437–445PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Seidell JC, Bakker CJ, van der Kooy K (1990) Imaging techniques for measuring adipose-tissue distribution—a comparison between computed tomography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance. Am J Clin Nutr 51:953–957PubMed Seidell JC, Bakker CJ, van der Kooy K (1990) Imaging techniques for measuring adipose-tissue distribution—a comparison between computed tomography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance. Am J Clin Nutr 51:953–957PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lancaster JL, Ghiatas AA, Alyassin A, et al. (1991) Measurement of abdominal fat with T1-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 1:363–369PubMedCrossRef Lancaster JL, Ghiatas AA, Alyassin A, et al. (1991) Measurement of abdominal fat with T1-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 1:363–369PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gronemeyer SA, Steen RG, Kauffman WM, et al. (2000) Fast adipose tissue (FAT) assessment by MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 18:815–818PubMedCrossRef Gronemeyer SA, Steen RG, Kauffman WM, et al. (2000) Fast adipose tissue (FAT) assessment by MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 18:815–818PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Kooy K, Leenen R, Seidell JC, et al. (1993) Waist–hip ratio is a poor predictor of changes in visceral fat. Am J Clin Nutr 57:327–333PubMed van der Kooy K, Leenen R, Seidell JC, et al. (1993) Waist–hip ratio is a poor predictor of changes in visceral fat. Am J Clin Nutr 57:327–333PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Abe T, Kawakami Y, Sugita M, et al. (1995) Use of B-mode ultrasound for visceral fat mass evaluation: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging. Appl Hum Sci 14:133–139 Abe T, Kawakami Y, Sugita M, et al. (1995) Use of B-mode ultrasound for visceral fat mass evaluation: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging. Appl Hum Sci 14:133–139
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki R, Watanabe S, Hirai Y, et al. (1993) Abdominal wall fat index, estimated by ultrasonography, for assessment of the ratio of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat in the abdomen. Am J Med 95:309–314PubMedCrossRef Suzuki R, Watanabe S, Hirai Y, et al. (1993) Abdominal wall fat index, estimated by ultrasonography, for assessment of the ratio of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat in the abdomen. Am J Med 95:309–314PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Armellini F, Zamboni M, Robbi R, et al. (1993) Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography. Int J Obes 17:209–214 Armellini F, Zamboni M, Robbi R, et al. (1993) Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography. Int J Obes 17:209–214
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kushner RF, Schoeller DA (1986) Estimation of total body water by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 44:417–424PubMed Kushner RF, Schoeller DA (1986) Estimation of total body water by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 44:417–424PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lukaski HC, Bolonchuk WW, Hall CB, et al. (1986) Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition. J Appl Physiol 60:1327–1332PubMed Lukaski HC, Bolonchuk WW, Hall CB, et al. (1986) Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition. J Appl Physiol 60:1327–1332PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutcliffe JF (1996) A review of in vivo experimental methods to determine the composition of the human body. Phys Med Biol 41:791–833PubMedCrossRef Sutcliffe JF (1996) A review of in vivo experimental methods to determine the composition of the human body. Phys Med Biol 41:791–833PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Stansell MJ, Mojica L Jr (1968) Determination of body water content using trace levels of deuterium oxide and infrared spectrophotometry. Clin Chem 14:1112–1124PubMed Stansell MJ, Mojica L Jr (1968) Determination of body water content using trace levels of deuterium oxide and infrared spectrophotometry. Clin Chem 14:1112–1124PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamba M, Meshitsuka S, Iriguchi N, et al. (2000) Measurement of relative fat content by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy using a clinical imager. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:330–335PubMedCrossRef Kamba M, Meshitsuka S, Iriguchi N, et al. (2000) Measurement of relative fat content by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy using a clinical imager. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:330–335PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Borkan GA, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH, et al. (1982) Assessment of abdominal fat content by computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr 36:172–177PubMed Borkan GA, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH, et al. (1982) Assessment of abdominal fat content by computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr 36:172–177PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Weits T, van der Beek EJ, Wedel M, et al. (1988) Computed tomography measurement of abdominal fat deposition in relation to anthropometry. Int J Obes 12:217–225PubMed Weits T, van der Beek EJ, Wedel M, et al. (1988) Computed tomography measurement of abdominal fat deposition in relation to anthropometry. Int J Obes 12:217–225PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fanelli MT, Kuczmarski RJ (1984) Ultrasound as an approach to assessing body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 39:703–709PubMed Fanelli MT, Kuczmarski RJ (1984) Ultrasound as an approach to assessing body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 39:703–709PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuczmarski RJ, Fanelli MT, Koch GG (1987) Ultrasonic assessment of body composition in obese adults: overcoming the limitations of the skinfold caliper. Am J Clin Nutr 45:717–724PubMed Kuczmarski RJ, Fanelli MT, Koch GG (1987) Ultrasonic assessment of body composition in obese adults: overcoming the limitations of the skinfold caliper. Am J Clin Nutr 45:717–724PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Leite CC, Wajchenberg BL, Radominski R, et al. (2002) Intra-abdominal thickness by ultrasonography to predict risk factors for cardiovascular disease and its correlation with anthropometric measurements. Metabolism 51:1034–1040PubMedCrossRef Leite CC, Wajchenberg BL, Radominski R, et al. (2002) Intra-abdominal thickness by ultrasonography to predict risk factors for cardiovascular disease and its correlation with anthropometric measurements. Metabolism 51:1034–1040PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Sonographic subcutaneous and visceral fat indices represent the distribution of body fat volume
verfasst von
Masahiko Koda
Miho Senda
Masayuki Kamba
Koji Kimura
Yoshikazu Murawaki
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2007
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9082-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2007

Abdominal Radiology 3/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.