Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2007

01.09.2007

Perceptive errors in CT colonography

verfasst von: C. Y. Nio, A. H. de Vries, J. Stoker

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Published results to date have indicated a good per patient sensitivity of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) for colorectal cancer and for polyps measuring 10 mm or more together with a very good specificity. Sensitivity and specificity for polyps in the range of 6–10 mm are moderate. These results, however, can be achieved only with meticulous attention to technique including adequate colonic distention, and acquisition of supine and prone thin-section computed tomographic (CT) images. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve involved in the interpretation of CTC studies, with performance statistics improving with operator experience. Radiologists must be comfortable in reporting directly from workstation monitors and have access to and be familiar with software for multiplanar and endoluminal reconstructions. In addition to maximize polyp detection and minimize false positive results, reporting radiologists must have a working knowledge of normal colorectal anatomy and pathology on CTC and be familiar with potential pitfalls in interpretation. Besides the description of several possible causes for perceptive errors, also a literature search of perceptive errors in CTC is included in this paper.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, et al. (2003) CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(6):1593–1598PubMed Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, et al. (2003) CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(6):1593–1598PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. (2005) CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237(3):893–904PubMedCrossRef Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. (2005) CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237(3):893–904PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL (2005) Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Int Med 142(8):635–650PubMed Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL (2005) Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Int Med 142(8):635–650PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326(10):658–662PubMedCrossRef Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326(10):658–662PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. (1990) Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 98(2):371–379PubMed O’Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. (1990) Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 98(2):371–379PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Simons BD, Morrison AS, Lev R, et al. (1992) Relationship of polyps to cancer of the large intestine. J Natl Cancer Inst 84(12):962–966PubMedCrossRef Simons BD, Morrison AS, Lev R, et al. (1992) Relationship of polyps to cancer of the large intestine. J Natl Cancer Inst 84(12):962–966PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Waye JD, Lewis BS, Frankel A, et al. (1988) Small colon polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 83(2):120–122PubMed Waye JD, Lewis BS, Frankel A, et al. (1988) Small colon polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 83(2):120–122PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al. (2004) Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 183(1):127–134 Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al. (2004) Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 183(1):127–134
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnesen RB, Adamsen S, Svendsen LB, et al. (2005) Missed lesions and false-positive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis. Endoscopy 37(10):937–944PubMedCrossRef Arnesen RB, Adamsen S, Svendsen LB, et al. (2005) Missed lesions and false-positive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis. Endoscopy 37(10):937–944PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Aldridge AJ, Simson JN (2001) Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? Eur J Surg 167(10):777–781PubMedCrossRef Aldridge AJ, Simson JN (2001) Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? Eur J Surg 167(10):777–781PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nusko G, Mansmann U, tendorf-Hofmann A, et al. (1997) Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by size and site. Int J Colorectal Dis 12(5):267–271PubMedCrossRef Nusko G, Mansmann U, tendorf-Hofmann A, et al. (1997) Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by size and site. Int J Colorectal Dis 12(5):267–271PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang CS, O’Brien MJ, Yang S, et al. (2004) Hyperplastic polyps, serrated adenomas, and the serrated polyp neoplasia pathway. Am J Gastroenterol 99(11):2242–2255PubMedCrossRef Huang CS, O’Brien MJ, Yang S, et al. (2004) Hyperplastic polyps, serrated adenomas, and the serrated polyp neoplasia pathway. Am J Gastroenterol 99(11):2242–2255PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125(2):311–319PubMedCrossRef Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125(2):311–319PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23):2191–2200PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23):2191–2200PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456):305–311PubMed Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456):305–311PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291(14):1713–1719PubMedCrossRef Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291(14):1713–1719PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127(1):41–48PubMedCrossRef van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127(1):41–48PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. (2004) Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol 11(7):750–756PubMedCrossRef Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. (2004) Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol 11(7):750–756PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al. (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222(2):337–345PubMedCrossRef Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al. (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222(2):337–345PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J, et al. (2004) CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology 233(2):328–337PubMedCrossRef van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J, et al. (2004) CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology 233(2):328–337PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I, et al. (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218(1):274–277PubMed Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I, et al. (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218(1):274–277PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zalis ME, Hahn PF (2001) Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 176(3):646–648PubMed Zalis ME, Hahn PF (2001) Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 176(3):646–648PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P, Herman M, et al. (2005) CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Radiol 15(6):1192–1202PubMedCrossRef Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P, Herman M, et al. (2005) CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Radiol 15(6):1192–1202PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, et al. (2005) CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(6):1836–1842PubMed Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, et al. (2005) CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(6):1836–1842PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Serlie IWO, Truyen R, Florie J, et al. (2003) Computed cleansing for virtual colonoscopy using a three-material transition model. In: Peters TM, Ellis RE, (eds). Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2003. Proceedings of the 6th international conference in Montreal, Canada, November 15–18, part 2. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2879, pp 175–183. 3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Serlie IWO, Truyen R, Florie J, et al. (2003) Computed cleansing for virtual colonoscopy using a three-material transition model. In: Peters TM, Ellis RE, (eds). Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2003. Proceedings of the 6th international conference in Montreal, Canada, November 15–18, part 2. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2879, pp 175–183. 3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(3):799–805PubMed Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(3):799–805PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson CD, Dachman AH (2000) CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 216(2):331–341PubMed Johnson CD, Dachman AH (2000) CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 216(2):331–341PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, et al. (2003) Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229(1):99–108PubMedCrossRef Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, et al. (2003) Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229(1):99–108PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Ruckert JC, et al. (2005) Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 236(1):184–188PubMedCrossRef Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Ruckert JC, et al. (2005) Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 236(1):184–188PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, et al. (2002) CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol 12(3):525–530PubMed Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, et al. (2002) CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol 12(3):525–530PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, et al. (1999) The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(1):169–172PubMed Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, et al. (1999) The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(1):169–172PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Church J, Delaney C (2003) Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 46(3):322–326PubMedCrossRef Church J, Delaney C (2003) Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 46(3):322–326PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Grant DS, Bartram CI, Heron CW (1986) A preliminary study of the possible benefits of using carbon dioxide insufflation during double-contrast barium enema. Br J Radiol 59(698):190–191PubMedCrossRef Grant DS, Bartram CI, Heron CW (1986) A preliminary study of the possible benefits of using carbon dioxide insufflation during double-contrast barium enema. Br J Radiol 59(698):190–191PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216(3):704–711PubMed Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216(3):704–711PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227(2):378–384PubMedCrossRef Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227(2):378–384PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, et al. (2003) Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(4):913–921PubMed Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, et al. (2003) Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(4):913–921PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW, et al. (2003) Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 228(3):878–885PubMedCrossRef Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW, et al. (2003) Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 228(3):878–885PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S, et al. (2006) Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(1):96–103PubMedCrossRef Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S, et al. (2006) Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(1):96–103PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Maccarty RL, et al. (1999) CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(5):1271–1278PubMed Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Maccarty RL, et al. (1999) CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(5):1271–1278PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(1):137–143PubMed Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(1):137–143PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ, et al. (2004) Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(4):881–889PubMed Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ, et al. (2004) Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(4):881–889PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. (2005) False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology 235(2):495–502PubMedCrossRef Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. (2005) False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology 235(2):495–502PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2003) CT colonography: methods, pathology and pitfalls. Clin Radiol 58(3):179–190PubMedCrossRef Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2003) CT colonography: methods, pathology and pitfalls. Clin Radiol 58(3):179–190PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor SD, Summers RM, Choi JR, et al. (2006) Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(1):51–57PubMedCrossRef O’Connor SD, Summers RM, Choi JR, et al. (2006) Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(1):51–57PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Laks S, Macari M, Bini EJ (2004) Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography. Radiology 231(3):761–766PubMedCrossRef Laks S, Macari M, Bini EJ (2004) Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography. Radiology 231(3):761–766PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JC, Dachman AH (2006) Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):1086–1089PubMedCrossRef Chen JC, Dachman AH (2006) Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):1086–1089PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S, et al. (2006) CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 16(1):68–72PubMedCrossRef Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S, et al. (2006) CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 16(1):68–72PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, et al. (2004) Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(5):1151–1158PubMed Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, et al. (2004) Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(5):1151–1158PubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Oto A, Gelebek V, Oguz BS, et al. (2003) CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13(7):1657–1663PubMedCrossRef Oto A, Gelebek V, Oguz BS, et al. (2003) CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13(7):1657–1663PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat van Gelder RE, Florie J, Nio CY, et al. (2006) A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review computed tomographic colonography. Eur Radiol [in press] van Gelder RE, Florie J, Nio CY, et al. (2006) A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review computed tomographic colonography. Eur Radiol [in press]
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Fidler JL, Johnson CD, Maccarty RL, et al. (2002) Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27(3):292–300PubMed Fidler JL, Johnson CD, Maccarty RL, et al. (2002) Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27(3):292–300PubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, et al. (2004) Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1343–1347PubMed Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, et al. (2004) Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1343–1347PubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. (2003) A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterol 98(11):2543–2549PubMedCrossRef Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. (2003) A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterol 98(11):2543–2549PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, et al. (2000) Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355(9211):1211–1214PubMedCrossRef Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, et al. (2000) Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355(9211):1211–1214PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Maccarty RL, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. (2006) Occult colorectal polyps on CT colonography: implications for surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(5):1380–1383PubMedCrossRef Maccarty RL, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. (2006) Occult colorectal polyps on CT colonography: implications for surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(5):1380–1383PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudo S (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 25(7):455–461PubMed Kudo S (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 25(7):455–461PubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudo S, Tamure S, Nakajima T, et al. (1995) Depressed type of colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 27(1):54–57PubMedCrossRef Kudo S, Tamure S, Nakajima T, et al. (1995) Depressed type of colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 27(1):54–57PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubio C, Watanabe T, Masaki T, et al. (1997) Histologic differences between flat tubular colorectal neoplasias in Japan and Sweden. In Vivo 11(1):93–94PubMed Rubio C, Watanabe T, Masaki T, et al. (1997) Histologic differences between flat tubular colorectal neoplasias in Japan and Sweden. In Vivo 11(1):93–94PubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubio CA, Kumagai J, Kanamori T, et al. (1995) Flat adenomas and flat adenocarcinomas of the colorectal mucosa in Japanese and Swedish patients. Comparative histologic study. Dis Colon Rectum 38(10):1075–1079PubMedCrossRef Rubio CA, Kumagai J, Kanamori T, et al. (1995) Flat adenomas and flat adenocarcinomas of the colorectal mucosa in Japanese and Swedish patients. Comparative histologic study. Dis Colon Rectum 38(10):1075–1079PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Saitoh Y, Waxman I, West AB, et al. (2001) Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population. Gastroenterology 120(7):1657–1665PubMedCrossRef Saitoh Y, Waxman I, West AB, et al. (2001) Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population. Gastroenterology 120(7):1657–1665PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, et al. (2002) Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 51(4):550–555PubMedCrossRef Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, et al. (2002) Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 51(4):550–555PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SH, Ha HK, Kim AY, et al. (2006) Flat polyps of the colon: detection with 16-MDCT colonography–preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1611–1617PubMedCrossRef Park SH, Ha HK, Kim AY, et al. (2006) Flat polyps of the colon: detection with 16-MDCT colonography–preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1611–1617PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. (2002) Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 224(2):383–392PubMedCrossRef Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. (2002) Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 224(2):383–392PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 50(3):309–313PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 50(3):309–313PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al. (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219(3):685–692PubMed Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al. (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219(3):685–692PubMed
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. (2004) CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14(6):1025–1033PubMedCrossRef Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. (2004) CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14(6):1025–1033PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat [Blinded for review]. Performance of radiographers in the evaluation of CT colonography (in press) [Blinded for review]. Performance of radiographers in the evaluation of CT colonography (in press)
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Engelby T, et al. (2005) Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography. Acad Radiol 12(1):67–73PubMedCrossRef Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Engelby T, et al. (2005) Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography. Acad Radiol 12(1):67–73PubMedCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG, et al. (2006) CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 16(8):1745–1749PubMedCrossRef Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG, et al. (2006) CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 16(8):1745–1749PubMedCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat [Blinded for review]. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multi-center study (in press) [Blinded for review]. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multi-center study (in press)
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, et al. (2005) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 129(6):1832–1844PubMedCrossRef Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, et al. (2005) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 129(6):1832–1844PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Perceptive errors in CT colonography
verfasst von
C. Y. Nio
A. H. de Vries
J. Stoker
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2007
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9170-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2007

Abdominal Radiology 5/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.