Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2013

01.10.2013

Staging accuracy of MR for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and imaging findings according to the tumor grade

verfasst von: Jung Hoon Kim, Hyo Won Eun, Young Jae Kim, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate staging accuracy of MR for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNETs) and imaging findings according to the tumor grade.

Materials and methods

Our study consisted of 39 patients with PNET G1 (n = 24), PNET G2 (n = 12), and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) (n = 3). All underwent preoperative MRI. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed MR findings including tumor margin, SI on T2WI, enhancement patterns, degenerative change, duct dilation, and ADC value. They also assessed T-stage, N-stage, and tumor size. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi square tests, ROC analysis, and Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Specific findings for PNEC or PNET G2 were ill-defined borders (P = 0.001) and hypo-SI on venous- and delayed-phase (P = 0.016). ADC value showed significant difference between PNET G1 and G2 (P = 0.007). The Az of ADC value for differentiating PNET G1 from G2 was 0.743. Sensitivity and specificity were 70% and 86%. Accuracy for T-staging was 77% (n = 30) and 85% (n = 33), and for N-staging was 92% (n = 36) and 87% (n = 34) with moderate agreement. T-stage showed significant difference according to tumor grade (P < 0.001), although there was no significant difference in tumor size or N-stage.

Conclusion

Ill-defined borders and hypo-SI on venous- and delayed-phase imaging are common findings of higher grade PNET, and ADC value is helpful for differentiating PNET G1 from G2. MR is useful for preoperative evaluation of T-, N-stage. Tumor size of PNET and T-stage showed significant difference according to tumor grade.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehehalt F, Saeger HD, Schmidt CM, Grützmann R (2009) Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Oncologist 14(5):456–467PubMedCrossRef Ehehalt F, Saeger HD, Schmidt CM, Grützmann R (2009) Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Oncologist 14(5):456–467PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise N (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise N (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Liszka Ł, Pająk J, Mrowiec S, et al. (2011) Discrepancies between two alternative staging systems (European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2006 and American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control 2010) of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. A study of 50 cases. Pathology-Research and Practice 207(4):220–224CrossRef Liszka Ł, Pająk J, Mrowiec S, et al. (2011) Discrepancies between two alternative staging systems (European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2006 and American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control 2010) of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. A study of 50 cases. Pathology-Research and Practice 207(4):220–224CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, et al. (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449(4):395–401PubMedCrossRef Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, et al. (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449(4):395–401PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rindi G, Klöppel G, Couvelard A, et al. (2007) TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 451(4):757–762PubMedCrossRef Rindi G, Klöppel G, Couvelard A, et al. (2007) TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 451(4):757–762PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sellner F, Thalhammer S, Stättner S, Karner J, Klimpfinger M (2011) TNM stage and grade in predicting the prognosis of operated, non-functioning neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas—a single-institution experience. J Surg Oncol 104(1):17–21PubMedCrossRef Sellner F, Thalhammer S, Stättner S, Karner J, Klimpfinger M (2011) TNM stage and grade in predicting the prognosis of operated, non-functioning neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas—a single-institution experience. J Surg Oncol 104(1):17–21PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bushnell DL, Baum RP (2011) Standard imaging techniques for neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 40(1):153PubMedCrossRef Bushnell DL, Baum RP (2011) Standard imaging techniques for neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 40(1):153PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Caramella C, Dromain C, De Baere T, et al. (2010) Endocrine pancreatic tumours: which are the most useful MRI sequences? Eur Radiol 20(11):2618–2627PubMedCrossRef Caramella C, Dromain C, De Baere T, et al. (2010) Endocrine pancreatic tumours: which are the most useful MRI sequences? Eur Radiol 20(11):2618–2627PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Herwick S, Miller FH, Keppke AL (2006) MRI of islet cell tumors of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(5):W472–W480PubMedCrossRef Herwick S, Miller FH, Keppke AL (2006) MRI of islet cell tumors of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(5):W472–W480PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ku YM, Shin SS, Lee CH, Semelka RC (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of cystic and endocrine pancreatic neoplasms. Top Magn Reson Imaging 20(1):11–18PubMedCrossRef Ku YM, Shin SS, Lee CH, Semelka RC (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of cystic and endocrine pancreatic neoplasms. Top Magn Reson Imaging 20(1):11–18PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis RB, Lattin GE, Paal E (2010) Pancreatic endocrine tumors: radiologic-clinicopathologic correlation. Radiographics 30(6):1445–1464PubMedCrossRef Lewis RB, Lattin GE, Paal E (2010) Pancreatic endocrine tumors: radiologic-clinicopathologic correlation. Radiographics 30(6):1445–1464PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SS, Byun JH, Park BJ, et al. (2008) Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: usefulness in characterizing solid pancreatic masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 28(4):928–936PubMedCrossRef Lee SS, Byun JH, Park BJ, et al. (2008) Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: usefulness in characterizing solid pancreatic masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 28(4):928–936PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Chen ZE, Yaghmai V, et al. (2011) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in pancreatic endocrine tumors correlated with histopathologic characteristics. J Magn Reson Imaging 33(5):1071–1079PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, Chen ZE, Yaghmai V, et al. (2011) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in pancreatic endocrine tumors correlated with histopathologic characteristics. J Magn Reson Imaging 33(5):1071–1079PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. New York: Springer, pp 285–296 Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. New York: Springer, pp 285–296
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekeblad S, Skogseid B, Dunder K, Öberg K, Eriksson B (2008) Prognostic factors and survival in 324 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumor treated at a single institution. Clin Cancer Res 14(23):7798–7803PubMedCrossRef Ekeblad S, Skogseid B, Dunder K, Öberg K, Eriksson B (2008) Prognostic factors and survival in 324 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumor treated at a single institution. Clin Cancer Res 14(23):7798–7803PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Park HS, Lee JM, Choi HK, et al. (2009) Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(3):586–595PubMedCrossRef Park HS, Lee JM, Choi HK, et al. (2009) Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(3):586–595PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ichikawa T, Federle M, Ohba S, et al. (2000) Atypical exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tumors (anaplastic, small cell, and giant cell types): CT and pathologic features in 14 patients. Abdom Imaging 25(4):409–419PubMedCrossRef Ichikawa T, Federle M, Ohba S, et al. (2000) Atypical exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tumors (anaplastic, small cell, and giant cell types): CT and pathologic features in 14 patients. Abdom Imaging 25(4):409–419PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rha SE, Jung SE, Lee KH, et al. (2007) CT and MR imaging findings of endocrine tumor of the pancreas according to WHO classification. Eur J Radiol 62(3):371–377PubMedCrossRef Rha SE, Jung SE, Lee KH, et al. (2007) CT and MR imaging findings of endocrine tumor of the pancreas according to WHO classification. Eur J Radiol 62(3):371–377PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Balci NC, Perman WH, Saglam S, et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas. Top Magn Reson Imaging 20(1):43PubMedCrossRef Balci NC, Perman WH, Saglam S, et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas. Top Magn Reson Imaging 20(1):43PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottola JC, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, et al. (2012) Diffusion-weighted MRI of focal cystic pancreatic lesions at 3.0-Tesla: preliminary results. Abdom Imaging 37(1):110–117PubMedCrossRef Mottola JC, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, et al. (2012) Diffusion-weighted MRI of focal cystic pancreatic lesions at 3.0-Tesla: preliminary results. Abdom Imaging 37(1):110–117PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Staging accuracy of MR for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and imaging findings according to the tumor grade
verfasst von
Jung Hoon Kim
Hyo Won Eun
Young Jae Kim
Joon Koo Han
Byung Ihn Choi
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0011-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

Abdominal Radiology 5/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.