Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 8/2015

01.10.2015

Performance of tumor growth kinetics as an imaging biomarker for response assessment in colorectal liver metastases: correlation with FDG PET

verfasst von: Adeel R. Seyal, Keyur Parekh, Atilla Arslanoglu, Fernanda D. Gonzalez-Guindalini, Sandra M. Tochetto, Yuri S. Velichko, Vahid Yaghmai

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 8/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To correlate RECIST, volumetric criteria, and tumor growth kinetics at multidetector-computed tomography with tumor metabolic activity at FDG PET in colorectal liver metastases (CRCLM) treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy.

Methods

Thirty-two CRCLM in 20 patients treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy were evaluated. Pre- and post-treatment CT scans were used to calculate reciprocal of doubling time (RDT), percentage change in the lesion’s longest transaxial diameter (RECIST 1.1), and percentage change in the tumor volume. The accuracy of these parameters in predicting response based on standard uptake value analysis at FDG PET was assessed. Data were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation, student’s t, Mann–Whitney, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

According to FDG PET, 24/32 (75%) lesions were categorized as responders and 8/32 (25%) lesions as nonresponders. Based on RDT, 26/32 (81.25%) lesions were classified as responders and 6/32 (18.75%) lesions as nonresponders. Response classification according to RDT and FDG PET was concordant in 30/32 (93.75%) lesions, whereas RECIST 1.1 and volumetric criteria were concordant with FDG PET for 20/32 (62.5%) and 21/32 (65.63%) lesions, respectively. A strong association was found between RDT and response based on FDG PET (odds ratio = 127.4; 95% CI 5.54–2997; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Tumor growth kinetics may be an effective imaging biomarker for response evaluation in CRCLM.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HS, Kim HO, Hong YS, et al. (2014) Prognostic value of metabolic parameters in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis following curative-intent colorectal and hepatic surgery. J Nucl Med 55(4):582–589. doi:10.2967/jnumed.113.128629 CrossRefPubMed Lee HS, Kim HO, Hong YS, et al. (2014) Prognostic value of metabolic parameters in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis following curative-intent colorectal and hepatic surgery. J Nucl Med 55(4):582–589. doi:10.​2967/​jnumed.​113.​128629 CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tochetto SM, Rezai P, Rezvani M, et al. (2010) Does multidetector CT attenuation change in colon cancer liver metastases treated with 90Y help predict metabolic activity at FDG PET? Radiology 255(1):164–172. doi:10.1148/radiol.09091028 CrossRefPubMed Tochetto SM, Rezai P, Rezvani M, et al. (2010) Does multidetector CT attenuation change in colon cancer liver metastases treated with 90Y help predict metabolic activity at FDG PET? Radiology 255(1):164–172. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​09091028 CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung WS, Park MS, Shin SJ, et al. (2012) Response evaluation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: RECIST version 1.1 versus modified CT criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):809–815. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7910 CrossRefPubMed Chung WS, Park MS, Shin SJ, et al. (2012) Response evaluation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: RECIST version 1.1 versus modified CT criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):809–815. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​11.​7910 CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Organization WH (1979) WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva: World Health Organization Organization WH (1979) WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva: World Health Organization
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Goshen E, Davidson T, Zwas ST, Aderka D (2006) PET/CT in the evaluation of response to treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer with bevacizumab and irinotecan. Technol Cancer Res Treat 5(1):37–43CrossRefPubMed Goshen E, Davidson T, Zwas ST, Aderka D (2006) PET/CT in the evaluation of response to treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer with bevacizumab and irinotecan. Technol Cancer Res Treat 5(1):37–43CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lastoria S, Piccirillo MC, Caraco C, et al. (2013) Early PET/CT scan is more effective than RECIST in predicting outcome of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. J Nucl Med 54(12):2062–2069. doi:10.2967/jnumed.113.119909 CrossRefPubMed Lastoria S, Piccirillo MC, Caraco C, et al. (2013) Early PET/CT scan is more effective than RECIST in predicting outcome of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. J Nucl Med 54(12):2062–2069. doi:10.​2967/​jnumed.​113.​119909 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L, et al. (2006) Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(4):417–434. doi:10.1109/TMI.2006.871547 CrossRefPubMed Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L, et al. (2006) Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(4):417–434. doi:10.​1109/​TMI.​2006.​871547 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Moltz JH, Bornemann L, Kuhnigk J-M, et al. (2009) Advanced segmentation techniques for lung nodules, liver metastases, and enlarged lymph nodes in CT scans. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 3(1):122–134. doi:10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2011107 CrossRef Moltz JH, Bornemann L, Kuhnigk J-M, et al. (2009) Advanced segmentation techniques for lung nodules, liver metastases, and enlarged lymph nodes in CT scans. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 3(1):122–134. doi:10.​1109/​JSTSP.​2008.​2011107 CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Keil S, Behrendt FF, Stanzel S, et al. (2008) Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. Comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria. Eur Radiol 18(11):2456–2465. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1050-6 CrossRefPubMed Keil S, Behrendt FF, Stanzel S, et al. (2008) Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. Comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria. Eur Radiol 18(11):2456–2465. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-008-1050-6 CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Soyer P, Poccard M, Boudiaf M, et al. (2004) Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. Radiology 231(2):413–420. doi:10.1148/radiol.2312021639 CrossRefPubMed Soyer P, Poccard M, Boudiaf M, et al. (2004) Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. Radiology 231(2):413–420. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2312021639 CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, et al. (2006) Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med 47(6):1059–1066PubMed Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, et al. (2006) Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med 47(6):1059–1066PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, et al. (1999) Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer 35(13):1773–1782CrossRefPubMed Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, et al. (1999) Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer 35(13):1773–1782CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Eaton BR, Kim HS, Schreibmann E, et al. (2014) Quantitative dosimetry for yttrium-90 radionuclide therapy: tumor dose predicts fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response in hepatic metastatic melanoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25(2):288–295. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2013.08.021 CrossRefPubMed Eaton BR, Kim HS, Schreibmann E, et al. (2014) Quantitative dosimetry for yttrium-90 radionuclide therapy: tumor dose predicts fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response in hepatic metastatic melanoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25(2):288–295. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jvir.​2013.​08.​021 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Skougaard K, Nielsen D, Jensen BV, Hendel HW (2013) Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab. J Nucl Med 54(7):1026–1031. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.111757 CrossRefPubMed Skougaard K, Nielsen D, Jensen BV, Hendel HW (2013) Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab. J Nucl Med 54(7):1026–1031. doi:10.​2967/​jnumed.​112.​111757 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zerizer I, Al-Nahhas A, Towey D, et al. (2012) The role of early (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of progression-free survival after (9)(0)Y radioembolization: comparison with RECIST and tumour density criteria. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39(9):1391–1399. doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2149-1 CrossRefPubMed Zerizer I, Al-Nahhas A, Towey D, et al. (2012) The role of early (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of progression-free survival after (9)(0)Y radioembolization: comparison with RECIST and tumour density criteria. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39(9):1391–1399. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-012-2149-1 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad SR, Jhaveri KS, Saini S, et al. (2002) CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques initial observations. Radiology 225(2):416–419. doi:10.1148/radiol.2252011604 CrossRefPubMed Prasad SR, Jhaveri KS, Saini S, et al. (2002) CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques initial observations. Radiology 225(2):416–419. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2252011604 CrossRefPubMed
23.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research, 1st edn. London: Chapman & Hall Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research, 1st edn. London: Chapman & Hall
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong CY, Salem R, Raman S, Gates VL, Dworkin HJ (2002) Evaluating 90Y-glass microsphere treatment response of unresectable colorectal liver metastases by [18F]FDG PET: a comparison with CT or MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29(6):815–820. doi:10.1007/s00259-002-0787-4 CrossRefPubMed Wong CY, Salem R, Raman S, Gates VL, Dworkin HJ (2002) Evaluating 90Y-glass microsphere treatment response of unresectable colorectal liver metastases by [18F]FDG PET: a comparison with CT or MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29(6):815–820. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-002-0787-4 CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
Metadaten
Titel
Performance of tumor growth kinetics as an imaging biomarker for response assessment in colorectal liver metastases: correlation with FDG PET
verfasst von
Adeel R. Seyal
Keyur Parekh
Atilla Arslanoglu
Fernanda D. Gonzalez-Guindalini
Sandra M. Tochetto
Yuri S. Velichko
Vahid Yaghmai
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 8/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0546-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2015

Abdominal Radiology 8/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.