Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2017

11.10.2016

Standard vs. reduced-radiation-dose CT in the tracing of the ureter

verfasst von: Chang Kyu Sung, Min Hoan Moon, Hwancheol Son, Sohee Oh, Myoung Seok Lee, Hyunsik Woo

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effectiveness of reduced-radiation-dose computed tomography (CT) protocols in the tracing of the ureter in patients with suspected renal colic.

Methods

The study was approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from the participants. From July 2012 to April 2014, 310 consecutive patients with suspected urolithiasis were recruited to undergo unenhanced CT at 280 (n = 62), 200 (n = 62), 140 (n = 62), 100 (n = 62), and 70 (n = 62) reference mA seconds (mAs) while keeping other imaging parameters constant. Images were independently and randomly reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the study to determine the tracing rates of the ureter and the acceptable rates of image quality according to different tube charge settings.

Results

A significant linear association was noted between tube charge settings, the rates for tracing of the ureter, and the acceptability of image quality (linear-by-linear association; p = 0.000 in all rates for both readers). The 140 reference mAs is the point at which the tracing rates deteriorate rapidly, with the tracing rate of 41.5% (95% CI 32.6%–51.0%) in reader 1 and 51.9% (95% CI 42.5%–61.2%) in reader 2, and with the acceptable rate of 82.3% (95% CI 70.8%–90.0%) in reader 1 and 96.8% (95% CI 88.3%–99.8%) in reader 2.

Conclusion

Decreasing the tube charge settings from 280 to 70 reference mAs resulted in a significant reduction in the tracing rate of the ureter, with 140 reference mAs being the breaking point.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kambadakone AR, Eisner BH, Catalano OA, Sahani DV (2010) New and evolving concepts in the imaging and management of urolithiasis: urologists’ perspective. Radiographics 30(3):603–623. doi:10.1148/rg.303095146 CrossRefPubMed Kambadakone AR, Eisner BH, Catalano OA, Sahani DV (2010) New and evolving concepts in the imaging and management of urolithiasis: urologists’ perspective. Radiographics 30(3):603–623. doi:10.​1148/​rg.​303095146 CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RC, Coll DM (2000) Helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of ureteric colic. BJU Int 86(Suppl 1):33–41PubMed Smith RC, Coll DM (2000) Helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of ureteric colic. BJU Int 86(Suppl 1):33–41PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz SI, Saluja S, Brink JA, Forman HP (2006) Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):1120–1124. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.1838 CrossRefPubMed Katz SI, Saluja S, Brink JA, Forman HP (2006) Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):1120–1124. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​04.​1838 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinkley DV (1970) Inference about change-point in a sequence of random variables. Biometrika 57(1):1–17CrossRef Hinkley DV (1970) Inference about change-point in a sequence of random variables. Biometrika 57(1):1–17CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Killick R, Eckley IA (2014) changepoint: an R package for changepoint analysis. J Stat Softw 58(3):1–19CrossRef Killick R, Eckley IA (2014) changepoint: an R package for changepoint analysis. J Stat Softw 58(3):1–19CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekstrom MP (2012) Digital image processing techniques, vol. 2. Cambridge: Academic Press Ekstrom MP (2012) Digital image processing techniques, vol. 2. Cambridge: Academic Press
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wall BF, Hart D (1997) Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 70(833):437–439. doi:10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227222 CrossRefPubMed Wall BF, Hart D (1997) Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 70(833):437–439. doi:10.​1259/​bjr.​70.​833.​9227222 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Standard vs. reduced-radiation-dose CT in the tracing of the ureter
verfasst von
Chang Kyu Sung
Min Hoan Moon
Hwancheol Son
Sohee Oh
Myoung Seok Lee
Hyunsik Woo
Publikationsdatum
11.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0929-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Abdominal Radiology 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

A “doughnut” in the abdomen

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.