Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 12/2017

24.06.2017

Detection of potentially relevant extracolonic and colorectal findings at CT colonography in a low-risk symptomatic patient population

verfasst von: F. R. S. Netz, P. J. Pickhardt, M. L. G. Janssen Heijnen, P. C. G. Simons

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

CT colonography (CTC) is a widely accepted examination tool for detection of colorectal lesions but evidence of the proportions of relevant extracolonic findings (ECF) in a large symptomatic but still relatively low-risk cohort is lacking, as well as their relationship to symptoms, age, and sex.

Methods

All patients (n = 3208) with colorectal symptoms, imaged between January 2007 and September 2016 with first-time CTC, were retrospectively selected. The majority (96.7%) was examined with low-dose unenhanced protocol. The most relevant ECF and colorectal lesions (≥6 mm) were prospectively assessed according to C-RADS classifications. Follow-up was elaborated based on the electronic record review. Chi-square test was utilized for evaluating the associations between relevant findings and symptoms, age, and sex.

Results

A total of 270 (8.4%) patients were classified as C-RADS E3, 63 (2.0%) patients as C-RADS E4, and 437 (13.6%) patients were assessed with colorectal lesions (C-RADS C2-4). At follow-up, two thirds of ECF turned out to be a malignancy or relevant disease that required further medical attention. The proportion of ECF was not related to specific colorectal symptoms. Patients aged ≥65 years and men had significantly higher proportions of ECF than younger patients (C-RADS E3 p = 0.005; C-RADS E4 p < 0.001) and women (C-RADS E3 p = 0.013; C-RADS E4 p = 0.009), respectively.

Conclusion

Proportions of relevant ECF and colorectal findings are relatively low in symptomatic low-risk patients. By use of CTC as a singular examination, especially in elderly patients, most colonoscopies can be avoided with the benefit of diagnosing relevant ECF without introducing substantial over-diagnosis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. (2011) Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection - systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 259(2):393–405CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. (2011) Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection - systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 259(2):393–405CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Simons PC, van Steenbergen LN, de Witte MT, et al. (2013) Miss rate of colorectal cancer at CT colonography in average-risk symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol 23(4):908–913CrossRefPubMed Simons PC, van Steenbergen LN, de Witte MT, et al. (2013) Miss rate of colorectal cancer at CT colonography in average-risk symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol 23(4):908–913CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat de Gonzales Berrington, et al. (2010) CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20(2):279–291CrossRef de Gonzales Berrington, et al. (2010) CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20(2):279–291CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar M, Cash BD (2017) Screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer using CT colonography. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 15(1):168–183CrossRefPubMed Kumar M, Cash BD (2017) Screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer using CT colonography. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 15(1):168–183CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Haan MC, Pickhardt PJ, Stoker J (2015) CT colonography: accuracy, acceptance, safety and position in organised population screening. Gut 64(2):342CrossRefPubMed de Haan MC, Pickhardt PJ, Stoker J (2015) CT colonography: accuracy, acceptance, safety and position in organised population screening. Gut 64(2):342CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moawad FJ, Maydonovitch CL, Cullen PA, et al. (2010) CT colonography may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance. Am J Roentgenol 195(5):1118–1123CrossRef Moawad FJ, Maydonovitch CL, Cullen PA, et al. (2010) CT colonography may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance. Am J Roentgenol 195(5):1118–1123CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Plumb AA, Boone D, Fitze H, et al. (2014) Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms. Radiology 273(1):144–152CrossRefPubMed Plumb AA, Boone D, Fitze H, et al. (2014) Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms. Radiology 273(1):144–152CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pooler BD, Baumel MJ, Cash BD, et al. (2012) Screening CT colonography: multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence. Am J Roentgenol 198(6):1361–1366CrossRef Pooler BD, Baumel MJ, Cash BD, et al. (2012) Screening CT colonography: multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence. Am J Roentgenol 198(6):1361–1366CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ (2015) CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time? Dig Dis Sci 60(3):647–659CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ (2015) CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time? Dig Dis Sci 60(3):647–659CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hummel JM, Steuten LG, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CJ, et al. (2013) Preferences for colorectal cancer screening techniques and intention to attend: a multi-criteria decision analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 11(5):499–507CrossRefPubMed Hummel JM, Steuten LG, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CJ, et al. (2013) Preferences for colorectal cancer screening techniques and intention to attend: a multi-criteria decision analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 11(5):499–507CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno CC, Weiss PS, Jarrett TL, et al. (2016) Patient preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: Test features and cost willing to pay out of pocket. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 45(3):189–192CrossRefPubMed Moreno CC, Weiss PS, Jarrett TL, et al. (2016) Patient preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: Test features and cost willing to pay out of pocket. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 45(3):189–192CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Gluck M, et al. (2012) Preference for colonoscopy versus computerized tomographic colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Gen Int Med 27(10):1349–1360CrossRef Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Gluck M, et al. (2012) Preference for colonoscopy versus computerized tomographic colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Gen Int Med 27(10):1349–1360CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, et al. (2013) Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 381:1194–1202CrossRefPubMed Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, et al. (2013) Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 381:1194–1202CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O, et al. (2015) Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: european society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) and european society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR) guideline. Eur Radiol 25:331–345CrossRefPubMed Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O, et al. (2015) Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: european society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) and european society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR) guideline. Eur Radiol 25:331–345CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Peulen JJS, de Witte MT, Friederich P et al. (2010) CT-colonography in symptomatic patients referred by the primary care physician in the Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154:1444–1451 Peulen JJS, de Witte MT, Friederich P et al. (2010) CT-colonography in symptomatic patients referred by the primary care physician in the Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154:1444–1451
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2016) Indeterminate but likely unimportant extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography (C-RADS Category E3): incidence and outcomes data from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 207(5):996–1001CrossRef Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2016) Indeterminate but likely unimportant extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography (C-RADS Category E3): incidence and outcomes data from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 207(5):996–1001CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2016) Potentially important extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: incidence and outcomes data from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 206:313–318CrossRef Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2016) Potentially important extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: incidence and outcomes data from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 206:313–318CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236(1):3–9CrossRefPubMed Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236(1):3–9CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, et al. (2015) Identification of extracolonic pathologies by computed tomographic colonography in colorectal cancer symptomatic patients. Gastroenterology 149:89–101CrossRefPubMed Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, et al. (2015) Identification of extracolonic pathologies by computed tomographic colonography in colorectal cancer symptomatic patients. Gastroenterology 149:89–101CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Badiani S, Tomas-Hernandez S, Karandikar S, et al. (2013) Extracolonic findings (ECF) on CT colonography (CTC) in patients presenting with colorectal symptoms. Acta Radiol 54:851–862CrossRefPubMed Badiani S, Tomas-Hernandez S, Karandikar S, et al. (2013) Extracolonic findings (ECF) on CT colonography (CTC) in patients presenting with colorectal symptoms. Acta Radiol 54:851–862CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Macari M, Nevsky G, Bonavita J, et al. (2011) CT colonography in senior versus nonsenior patients: extracolonic findings, recommendations for additional imaging, and polyp prevalence. Radiology 259(3):767–774CrossRefPubMed Macari M, Nevsky G, Bonavita J, et al. (2011) CT colonography in senior versus nonsenior patients: extracolonic findings, recommendations for additional imaging, and polyp prevalence. Radiology 259(3):767–774CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pooler BD, Kim DH, Lam VP, et al. (2014) CT colonography reporting and data system (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 202(6):1232–1237CrossRef Pooler BD, Kim DH, Lam VP, et al. (2014) CT colonography reporting and data system (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 202(6):1232–1237CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ginnerup Pederson B, Rosenkilde M, Christiansen TE, et al. (2003) Extracolonic findings at computed tomography are a challenge. Gut 52(12):1744–1747CrossRef Ginnerup Pederson B, Rosenkilde M, Christiansen TE, et al. (2003) Extracolonic findings at computed tomography are a challenge. Gut 52(12):1744–1747CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan KY, Xiong T, McCafferty I, et al. (2007) Frequency and impact of extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic colonography in a symptomatic population. Br J Surg 94(3):335–361CrossRef Khan KY, Xiong T, McCafferty I, et al. (2007) Frequency and impact of extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic colonography in a symptomatic population. Br J Surg 94(3):335–361CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Spreng A, Netzer P, Mattich J, et al. (2005) Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography. Eur Radiol 15(10):2088–2095CrossRefPubMed Spreng A, Netzer P, Mattich J, et al. (2005) Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography. Eur Radiol 15(10):2088–2095CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolan DJ, Armstrong EM, Chapman AH (2007) Replacing barium enema with CT colonography in patients older than 70 years: the importance of detecting extracolonic abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1104–1111CrossRef Tolan DJ, Armstrong EM, Chapman AH (2007) Replacing barium enema with CT colonography in patients older than 70 years: the importance of detecting extracolonic abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1104–1111CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellström M, Svensson MH, Lasson A (2004) Extracolonic and incidental findings on CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Am J Roentgenol 182(3):631–638CrossRef Hellström M, Svensson MH, Lasson A (2004) Extracolonic and incidental findings on CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Am J Roentgenol 182(3):631–638CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Veerappan GR, Ally MR, Choi JH, et al. (2010) Extracolonic findings on CT colonography increases yield of colorectal cancer screening. Am J Roentgenol 95:677–686CrossRef Veerappan GR, Ally MR, Choi JH, et al. (2010) Extracolonic findings on CT colonography increases yield of colorectal cancer screening. Am J Roentgenol 95:677–686CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Detection of potentially relevant extracolonic and colorectal findings at CT colonography in a low-risk symptomatic patient population
verfasst von
F. R. S. Netz
P. J. Pickhardt
M. L. G. Janssen Heijnen
P. C. G. Simons
Publikationsdatum
24.06.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1221-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Abdominal Radiology 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.