Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 1/2017

12.11.2016 | Original Article

Efficacy and toxicity of rechallenge with combination immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic melanoma: a case series

verfasst von: Lavinia Spain, Gerard Walls, Christina Messiou, Samra Turajlic, Martin Gore, James Larkin

Erschienen in: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The efficacy and potential toxicity of rechallenge with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab has not been described. Retreatment of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the setting of prior significant toxicity lacks evidence-based guidance.

Methods

We present the first three, consecutive patients who received re-treatment with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab for metastatic melanoma managed at our institution.

Results

Rechallenge with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab in the setting of prior grade 3 toxicity with initial combination therapy is feasible, and responses are seen. We highlight the fact that grade 3 toxicity is likely to recur, but if so, can be manageable.

Conclusions

Retreatment with ipi + nivo may be considered an option in carefully selected, well-informed patients. More research is required to delineate the benefits and risks with this approach.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF et al (2010) Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 363:711–723CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF et al (2010) Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 363:711–723CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, Long GV, Brady B et al (2015) Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med 372:320–330CrossRefPubMed Robert C, Long GV, Brady B et al (2015) Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med 372:320–330CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV et al (2015) Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 372:2521–2532CrossRefPubMed Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV et al (2015) Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 372:2521–2532CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al (2015) Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 373:23–34CrossRefPubMed Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al (2015) Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 373:23–34CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H et al (2015) Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:444–451CrossRefPubMed Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H et al (2015) Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:444–451CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebbe C, Weber JS, Maio M et al (2014) Survival follow-up and ipilimumab retreatment of patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab in prior phase II studies. Ann Oncol 25:2277–2284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lebbe C, Weber JS, Maio M et al (2014) Survival follow-up and ipilimumab retreatment of patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab in prior phase II studies. Ann Oncol 25:2277–2284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Horvat TZ, Adel NG, Dang TO et al (2015) Immune-related adverse events, need for systemic immunosuppression, and effects on survival and time to treatment failure in patients with melanoma treated with ipilimumab at memorial sloan kettering cancer center. J Clin Oncol 33:3193–3198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Horvat TZ, Adel NG, Dang TO et al (2015) Immune-related adverse events, need for systemic immunosuppression, and effects on survival and time to treatment failure in patients with melanoma treated with ipilimumab at memorial sloan kettering cancer center. J Clin Oncol 33:3193–3198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al (2015) 3303 Efficacy and safety in key patient subgroups of nivolumab (NIVO) alone or combined with ipilimumab (IPI) versus IPI alone in treatment-naïve patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) (CheckMate 067). Eur Cancer Congr 51(Suppl S3):S664–S665. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(16)31822-6 CrossRef Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al (2015) 3303 Efficacy and safety in key patient subgroups of nivolumab (NIVO) alone or combined with ipilimumab (IPI) versus IPI alone in treatment-naïve patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) (CheckMate 067). Eur Cancer Congr 51(Suppl S3):S664–S665. doi:10.​1016/​S0959-8049(16)31822-6 CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK et al (2013) Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 369:122–133CrossRefPubMed Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK et al (2013) Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 369:122–133CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy and toxicity of rechallenge with combination immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic melanoma: a case series
verfasst von
Lavinia Spain
Gerard Walls
Christina Messiou
Samra Turajlic
Martin Gore
James Larkin
Publikationsdatum
12.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-7004
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0851
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-016-1926-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.