Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 1/2009

01.02.2009 | Original Paper

Assessing the clinical significance of change scores following carpal tunnel surgery

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This article presents a prospective longitudinal study to determine the cut-off values for change scores of DASH, Levine, and Kamath questionnaires to distinguish clinical improvement following carpal tunnel surgery. Fifty-four patients (40 female, 14 male), with positive nerve conduction studies, were prospectively followed up. Three questionnaires (DASH, Levine, and Kamath) were posted to patients at four and two weeks prior to their operation and then six weeks following surgery. A patient global impression of change (PGIC) score was completed for patients to rate the overall change in their symptoms. According to the PGIC, 93% of patients improved. The cut-off values for raw change scores that best define clinically significant improvement following carpal tunnel release were 20.9 for DASH, 0.47 for Levine, and 1.97 for the Kamath questionnaire. This study provides a methodological framework for identifying clinically significant changes following treatment. A questionnaire follow-up of patients is now possible using the data provided.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Amadio PC, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Jensen LM (1996) Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: the relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures. J Hand Surg [Am] 21:338–346CrossRef Amadio PC, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Jensen LM (1996) Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: the relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures. J Hand Surg [Am] 21:338–346CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C (2001) Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 14:128–146PubMed Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C (2001) Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 14:128–146PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, Kalairajah Y (2007) Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand—which one to choose? Int Orthop (in press). doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0368-z Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, Kalairajah Y (2007) Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand—which one to choose? Int Orthop (in press). doi:10.​1007/​s00264-007-0368-z
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL (2000) Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88:287–294PubMedCrossRef Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL (2000) Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88:287–294PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ (2004) Dash and Boston responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? J Hand Surg [Br] 29:159–164 Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ (2004) Dash and Boston responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? J Hand Surg [Br] 29:159–164
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2004) The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders. J Hand Surg [Am] 29:727–734CrossRef Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2004) The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders. J Hand Surg [Am] 29:727–734CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Juniper EF, Walter SD, Griffith LE, Goldstein RS (1998) Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials. BMJ 316:690–693PubMed Guyatt GH, Juniper EF, Walter SD, Griffith LE, Goldstein RS (1998) Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials. BMJ 316:690–693PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyette TM, Wilgis EF (2004) Timing of improvement after carpal tunnel release. J Surg Orthop Adv 13:206–209PubMed Guyette TM, Wilgis EF (2004) Timing of improvement after carpal tunnel release. J Surg Orthop Adv 13:206–209PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Heybeli N, Kutluhan S, Demirci S, Kerman M, Mumcu EF (2002) Assessment of outcome of carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison of electrophysiological findings and a self-administered questionnaire. J Hand Surg [Br] 27:259–264 Heybeli N, Kutluhan S, Demirci S, Kerman M, Mumcu EF (2002) Assessment of outcome of carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison of electrophysiological findings and a self-administered questionnaire. J Hand Surg [Br] 27:259–264
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608PubMedCrossRef Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurst H, Bolton J (2004) Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27:26–35PubMedCrossRef Hurst H, Bolton J (2004) Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27:26–35PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobson NS, Follette WG, Revenstorf D (1984) Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behav Ther 15:336–352CrossRef Jacobson NS, Follette WG, Revenstorf D (1984) Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behav Ther 15:336–352CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamath V, Stothard J (2003) A clinical questionnaire for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 28:455–459 Kamath V, Stothard J (2003) A clinical questionnaire for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 28:455–459
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27:S178–S189PubMedCrossRef Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27:S178–S189PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirshner B, Guyatt G (1985) A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 38:27–36PubMedCrossRef Kirshner B, Guyatt G (1985) A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 38:27–36PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, Katz JN (1993) A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone and Joint Surg [Am] 75:1585–1592 Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, Katz JN (1993) A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone and Joint Surg [Am] 75:1585–1592
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles A, Charlton BG, Bentley P, Polychronis A, Grey J, Price N (2000) New perspectives in the evidence-based healthcare debate. J Eval Clin Prac 6:77–84CrossRef Miles A, Charlton BG, Bentley P, Polychronis A, Grey J, Price N (2000) New perspectives in the evidence-based healthcare debate. J Eval Clin Prac 6:77–84CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC (1998) Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health 88:1447–1451PubMedCrossRef Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC (1998) Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health 88:1447–1451PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB (2000) Evidence-based medicine how to practice and teach EBM, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 105–153 Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB (2000) Evidence-based medicine how to practice and teach EBM, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 105–153
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sambandam SN, Priyanka P, Gul A, Ilango B (2007) Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int Orthop (in press). doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0344-7 Sambandam SN, Priyanka P, Gul A, Ilango B (2007) Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int Orthop (in press). doi:10.​1007/​s00264-007-0344-7
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens JC, Sun S, Beard CM, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT (1988) Carpal tunnel syndrome in Rochester, Minnesota, 1961 to 1980. Neurology 38:134–138PubMed Stevens JC, Sun S, Beard CM, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT (1988) Carpal tunnel syndrome in Rochester, Minnesota, 1961 to 1980. Neurology 38:134–138PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Testa M (1987) Interpreting quality of life clinical trial data for use in the clinical practice of antihypertensive therapy. J Hypertens 5(suppl):S9–S13 Testa M (1987) Interpreting quality of life clinical trial data for use in the clinical practice of antihypertensive therapy. J Hypertens 5(suppl):S9–S13
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Turk DC (2000) Statistical significance and clinical significance are not synonyms! Clin J Pain 16:185–187PubMedCrossRef Turk DC (2000) Statistical significance and clinical significance are not synonyms! Clin J Pain 16:185–187PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Turk DC, Okifuji A, Sinclair JD, Starz TW (1998) Interdisciplinary treatment for fibromyalgia syndrome: clinical and statistical significance. Arthritis Care Res 11:186–195PubMedCrossRef Turk DC, Okifuji A, Sinclair JD, Starz TW (1998) Interdisciplinary treatment for fibromyalgia syndrome: clinical and statistical significance. Arthritis Care Res 11:186–195PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wyrwich KW, Wolinsky FD (2000) Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures. J Eval Clin Prac 6:39–49CrossRef Wyrwich KW, Wolinsky FD (2000) Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures. J Eval Clin Prac 6:39–49CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessing the clinical significance of change scores following carpal tunnel surgery
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2009
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0471-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

International Orthopaedics 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Osteochondritis dissecans

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.